Fauci and CDC recommend 2nd booster for 50+. Who got it?
- Thread starter Boston.Knight
- Start date
What a fantastic reminder of:
-Donkey BS and how wrong he is/was
-Donkey Boston and how crazy he is/was
-Donkey bchailmary/knighttime and how he deleted all his posts
-crazyhole and how he’s gone
-Donkey BS and how wrong he is/was
-Donkey Boston and how crazy he is/was
-Donkey bchailmary/knighttime and how he deleted all his posts
-crazyhole and how he’s gone
I've had more ringing in my ears, but that could just be old age. I've always had minor Tinnitus since when I was younger, which is why I don't so much have a fear of heights, I just cannot be guaranteed to stand up straight and balanced ... especially as I age.
But ... since mRNA is intramuscular, it should only be generating IgG antibodies in the blood, not the IgA antibodies upper-respiratory tract like the Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT). So ... it could be actual SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infections, and not any mRNA (or Ad-mRNA) vaccine. There are exceptions to this though.
For example ... I'm suspetible to pink eye, and the Ad26 vector totally caused me to lose sight for a day due to over-reaction, and reduced sight for a full week, causing a massive bacterial infection and complication. I still have infrequent 'over-reactions' in my eyes nearly 2 years later, and I'm not alone.
And that's the biggest issue with both mRNA and Ad-mRNA vectors ... no vaccine should cause a massive over-reaction, and the sheer number of immediate CNS and cardiovascular events are beyond the rates of the smallpox vaccine, which is not mandated for the very reason it causes the highest rates of CNS and cardiovacaular events.
BTW ... tihs the same problem when mRNA vectors, Ad or not, were used in trials with the flu piror. Why the US blocked a traditional SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccine for so long, when the rest of the world, even Canada, approved it ... is beyond me. Parents were taking kids to Canada to be vaccinated prior to the US approving a non-mRNA vaccine.
Long-term, we still don't know sh--. And we won't for much of this decade.
Stop lying and make up what you said long ago. Everyone sees right through it at this point. I mean ...
You mean vaccines reduced the spread with any significance?! Infections as well? And recovery from Alpha, let alone Delta, wasn't as good as vaccination, especially against Delta and Omicron? And even the updated boosters worked better than the boosters which worked better than initial vaccine?
And I was an idiot for going full P100 (>99.97% particulate + oil vapor filtration) cartridges instead of just N95 (95% particulate-only)?!
Excuse me I as I wade through the narrative bullsh-- you proliferated from the US Media that literally ended up being dead wrong, but ...
Most experts at various journals outside the US were warning against. Same with the whole aspect that the US blind bought 171M vials of the updated boosters based on artificial antibody counts, while Pharma purposely surpressed and withheld how little they actually worked!
Krause, Offit, all the top experts in this country that are pro-vax literally called out the stupidty on that one just recently! As I said, I tried to warn you! This are our country's top and most trusted vaccination experts!
FDA vaccine advisers 'disappointed' and 'angry' that early data about new Covid-19 booster shot wasn't presented for review last year | CNN
Some vaccine advisers to the federal government say they're "disappointed" and "angry" that government scientists and the pharmaceutical company Moderna didn't present a set of infection data on the company's new Covid-19 booster during meetings last year when the advisers discussed whether the...
Maybe it’s the fact that you’re 400+ pounds with a sodium level higher than a salt mine
Wtf? Not a good look
Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over
Last edited:
1) Anti-United States
2) Anti-Big Pharma
3) Anti-Government
Checks all the boxes once again
“I've had more ringing in my ears, but that could just be old age.”EVERYONE OF MY MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES SEES THROUGH IT!!!
I swear you need to calm down before that fat heart of yours explodes. Just admit you are/were wrong. It would save you from a lot of stress. That shit kills people. And makes them obese. That combined with copious amounts of food makes you one deadly motherhumper.
Quit eating. Quit posting. As if it weren't inherently clear, both are literally killing you. 4.8 years left.
^^^^^^
Nothing to see here
"My ears ring, my joints hurt, and chairs break beneath my ass. ALL BECAUSE I GOT THE COVID VAXXXXX!!!!!"
Maybe it’s the fact that you’re 400+ pounds with a sodium level higher than a salt mine
Wtf? Not a good look
Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over Over and over and over and over and over and over
EVERYONE OF MY MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES SEES THROUGH IT!!!
I swear you need to calm down before that fat heart of yours explodes. Just admit you are/were wrong. It would save you from a lot of stress. That shit kills people. And makes them obese. That combined with copious amounts of food makes you one deadly motherhumper.
Quit eating. Quit posting. As if it weren't inherently clear, both are literally killing you. 4.8 years left.
Welcome ... to the ****tardery.
We are just following the lead you’ve been putting on these boards for decades, Fatty Chair Breaker. If you don’t like it, leave. It would be best if you did since these forums are like killing you, and stuff.
Yes, when you're in the presence of one of the very greats ... you tend to be very humble, even self-deprecating. Is there a context or point to this post? Is this another one of Mikes' burner accounts?
(BTW, you know who that is ... correct? I didn't even want to take the pic, but my wife wanted something ... as well as one of the largest international standards organizations in the industry I represented as one of the board of directors at the time.)
Last edited:
Yes, because you've contributed soooooo much here other than veiled threats.
Just another day of your ****tardery, Bertha.
Since the ****tards -- those who will never admit they were wrong, and berrated all of us objective individuals who read experts at the BMJ and elsewhere, even the FDA and the recent FOIA releases that prove data was withheld, and then poor when finally released (we made data-free, scientifically-wrong, decisions) -- continue to want to fill up the scrollbar, I'll do so equally ... with solid information.
Echos of Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) ... Still Ignored Today Too
Looks like adjuvants, like squalene, are the continued 'battleground.' This was a big focus with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS), but it ended up going nowhere. A big reason is that the UK, US and other governments repeatedly stated said they did not use squalene in their Gulf War-specific cocktails.
The truth is more of a mix (more on that in a bit).
But one thing that was proven in the studies is that some people just have issues with squalene and select, other adjuvants. It's why people who weren't even deployed to the Gulf had issues, while others who were did not. That's why the stigma of anyone with GWS, which is easily proven, medical, is still that there's no 'direct answer,' so they are not believed.
Sound familiar? Anyone claiming harm, loss of bodily functions or even death of a family member over SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and Ad-mRNA vaccines, are not believed, just like with GWS. And without a 'smoking gun,' this is likely to be the case for years.
There is even the TILT theory now, that it's other toxic chemicals. And that could definitely factor into things. But still, the CD4 and adjuvant studies remain, and are not disputed.
Adjuvants Are Good ... Until They Are Not (and Medically Proven To Be a Problem for Some)
Now adjuvants have real benefits, like stimulating antibody production, and that's why they are used in some vaccines. But any time you stimulate the immune system, there is a risk. The key?
People repeadly vaccinated, such as the result of not 'keeping up their schedule' prior, were more suseptible to white blood cell CD4 stimulation and eventually developed autoimmune issues. This happened, commonly, in the military, and the Gulf War and other deployments forced them into getting multiple shots ... often mandated, unlike the civilian sector.
Again, it was proven that pretty much 95%+ of those who were long-term ill with GWS definitely had antibody reactions and autoimmune issues surrounding CD4 and adjuvants. Which brings us back to repeat, let alone combo, vaccinations.
The FDA Has No Power to Limit Vaccines and Outlaw Combinational Vaccines
The biggest regulatory problem is that the FDA only regulates individual shots. They do not control schedule, which is the CDC. Also and most importantly, the FDA cannot prevent 'combo' shots and 'shot busses' with unqualified technicians who make people sign waivers and other legal 'hold harmless.'
The FDA review teams have repeatedly brought up the fact that multiple vaccines should not be given at the same time.
E.g., they previously recommended influenza vaccines not be given with shinges vaccines for the elderly at the same time, but two (2) weeks apart, and -- for further mitigation of more local reactions -- in different arms.
They even and specifically warned if you did within the same 72 hours, and it would inhibit creation if antibodies for both as well, causing split-focus and other aspects -- defeating the purpose of getting either vaccine, let alone both at the same time, in the first place -- as well as overwhelm the immune system even more.
And now we have the triple-shots ... VZL/VZV Shingles, Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) at the same time! Great job!
This continues to not only completely gone ignored, despite FDA warnings -- much like all the various 'warning signs' of complications with young people (under 40, and especially minors) after their first mRNA shot (part of the reason the FDA review panels unianimously shot down any vaccines for kids) -- but ... the CDC even promotes it as 'better' as in 'one shot for all.' And shot busses love the revenue margins.
So ... they are popular, for fiscal reasons, not medical ones ... actually, at odds with the FDA's testing and recommendations.
Boosting Over and Over Is Not Viable ... It's Universally Agreed Among Experts
The transcripts of the FDA review panels all this past year have been chirping with this, especially how short any efficiency, most of them being statistically insignificant, the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines have been. They take weeks to build up antibodies, then seemingly lose effectiveness within a couple months. The level of punishment on the immune system is unsustainable, and you'd be hard pressed to find any expert at the FDA -- even today, after all the resignations over prior ignorance by leadership and the administraion -- that disagrees.
mRNA vaccines have used squalene in their lipid bubble and to increase white blood CD4 interaction. It's not just a short-term issue. If someone has an allergy, it's going to show up... and not just short-term. And to get it over and over, instead of once a year, or once every 5 years, it's going to continue to cause problems. Squalene is used in Influenza Virus Vaccines as well, and most researchers recommend not getting the same Flu straings in a vaccine every year, but mixing it up.
This is because of Imprinting, which is now looking like reality with not just Flu vaccines, but COVID too. That's why shooting up with the updated booster is no better than getting the prior. Even new studies on Dtap and related tetanus is showing no benefit. E.g., the EU EMA found that if you get your 3-combo MMR, Dtap, et al. as a kid ... you don't even need any tetanus shots as an adult. There is no benefit.
Continuing to Throw Caution to the Wind ... Believing More Is Better (Maybe Profit?)
It amazes me how much we now assume things work and aren't an issue, including being shot up as much as possible, and people want to see proof to the contrary that it's not ... and even when it's provided, they refues to believe it. Allegedly no one has had any long-term complications, and definitely no one has died, from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination ... at least not definitively proven.
Well, that's immediately horsesh-- because many of us know at least one co-worker or family member who has had a poor reaction that caused great, although hopefully temporary, harm ... and possibly permanent damage, typically from a CNS or muscular event, that was confirmed by a doctor. Anyone saying otherwise really needs to stop making it up.
But that's a risk some of us are willing to take ... within reason. And that's the problem ... right there! That more is better and has no risk. It's not difficult to find study after study showing, just like with GWS, that CD4 overreaction and resulting autoimmunity is not only easy to find, but to compare to prior bloodwork. It's not caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) either, it's caused by adjuvants.
Which is why, more and more ... the more shots you get in a short period, with those with adjuvants, the more you increase your risk. And we should really, really start looking at if we really need adjuvants in vaccines ... especially the ones that can kick the living sh-- out of your immune system, let alone if you get multiple. That's why a lot of people, and I knew most people, who got the 2-3 shot combos last fall ... ended up getting diseased from SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).
And the people who had the worst reactions from SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and Ad-mRNA vaccines alike ... were people who had already recovered from Alpha or Delta, and never need a shot, let alone the mandates increased risk. In fact, they were already better protected than with the shot, let alone the shot alone. The shot introduced an adjuvant when their immunity system and defenses were already weakened. Maybe, just maybe, we should look at using adjuvant-free vaccines ... when someone has already recovered.
But nope ... no changes, "Safe and effective, get it every 3-6 months so you can 'keep your defenses up.'" If you say otherwise, you will be censored and even censured if you're a professional. Doesn't matter if you're one of the top experts at the FDA, and a well known pro-vaccine advocate. You're ****ed.
time.com
www.cnn.com
Echos of Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) ... Still Ignored Today Too
Looks like adjuvants, like squalene, are the continued 'battleground.' This was a big focus with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS), but it ended up going nowhere. A big reason is that the UK, US and other governments repeatedly stated said they did not use squalene in their Gulf War-specific cocktails.
The truth is more of a mix (more on that in a bit).
But one thing that was proven in the studies is that some people just have issues with squalene and select, other adjuvants. It's why people who weren't even deployed to the Gulf had issues, while others who were did not. That's why the stigma of anyone with GWS, which is easily proven, medical, is still that there's no 'direct answer,' so they are not believed.
Sound familiar? Anyone claiming harm, loss of bodily functions or even death of a family member over SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and Ad-mRNA vaccines, are not believed, just like with GWS. And without a 'smoking gun,' this is likely to be the case for years.
There is even the TILT theory now, that it's other toxic chemicals. And that could definitely factor into things. But still, the CD4 and adjuvant studies remain, and are not disputed.
Adjuvants Are Good ... Until They Are Not (and Medically Proven To Be a Problem for Some)
Now adjuvants have real benefits, like stimulating antibody production, and that's why they are used in some vaccines. But any time you stimulate the immune system, there is a risk. The key?
People repeadly vaccinated, such as the result of not 'keeping up their schedule' prior, were more suseptible to white blood cell CD4 stimulation and eventually developed autoimmune issues. This happened, commonly, in the military, and the Gulf War and other deployments forced them into getting multiple shots ... often mandated, unlike the civilian sector.
Again, it was proven that pretty much 95%+ of those who were long-term ill with GWS definitely had antibody reactions and autoimmune issues surrounding CD4 and adjuvants. Which brings us back to repeat, let alone combo, vaccinations.
The FDA Has No Power to Limit Vaccines and Outlaw Combinational Vaccines
The biggest regulatory problem is that the FDA only regulates individual shots. They do not control schedule, which is the CDC. Also and most importantly, the FDA cannot prevent 'combo' shots and 'shot busses' with unqualified technicians who make people sign waivers and other legal 'hold harmless.'
The FDA review teams have repeatedly brought up the fact that multiple vaccines should not be given at the same time.
E.g., they previously recommended influenza vaccines not be given with shinges vaccines for the elderly at the same time, but two (2) weeks apart, and -- for further mitigation of more local reactions -- in different arms.
They even and specifically warned if you did within the same 72 hours, and it would inhibit creation if antibodies for both as well, causing split-focus and other aspects -- defeating the purpose of getting either vaccine, let alone both at the same time, in the first place -- as well as overwhelm the immune system even more.
And now we have the triple-shots ... VZL/VZV Shingles, Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) at the same time! Great job!
This continues to not only completely gone ignored, despite FDA warnings -- much like all the various 'warning signs' of complications with young people (under 40, and especially minors) after their first mRNA shot (part of the reason the FDA review panels unianimously shot down any vaccines for kids) -- but ... the CDC even promotes it as 'better' as in 'one shot for all.' And shot busses love the revenue margins.
So ... they are popular, for fiscal reasons, not medical ones ... actually, at odds with the FDA's testing and recommendations.
Boosting Over and Over Is Not Viable ... It's Universally Agreed Among Experts
The transcripts of the FDA review panels all this past year have been chirping with this, especially how short any efficiency, most of them being statistically insignificant, the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines have been. They take weeks to build up antibodies, then seemingly lose effectiveness within a couple months. The level of punishment on the immune system is unsustainable, and you'd be hard pressed to find any expert at the FDA -- even today, after all the resignations over prior ignorance by leadership and the administraion -- that disagrees.
mRNA vaccines have used squalene in their lipid bubble and to increase white blood CD4 interaction. It's not just a short-term issue. If someone has an allergy, it's going to show up... and not just short-term. And to get it over and over, instead of once a year, or once every 5 years, it's going to continue to cause problems. Squalene is used in Influenza Virus Vaccines as well, and most researchers recommend not getting the same Flu straings in a vaccine every year, but mixing it up.
This is because of Imprinting, which is now looking like reality with not just Flu vaccines, but COVID too. That's why shooting up with the updated booster is no better than getting the prior. Even new studies on Dtap and related tetanus is showing no benefit. E.g., the EU EMA found that if you get your 3-combo MMR, Dtap, et al. as a kid ... you don't even need any tetanus shots as an adult. There is no benefit.
Continuing to Throw Caution to the Wind ... Believing More Is Better (Maybe Profit?)
It amazes me how much we now assume things work and aren't an issue, including being shot up as much as possible, and people want to see proof to the contrary that it's not ... and even when it's provided, they refues to believe it. Allegedly no one has had any long-term complications, and definitely no one has died, from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination ... at least not definitively proven.
Well, that's immediately horsesh-- because many of us know at least one co-worker or family member who has had a poor reaction that caused great, although hopefully temporary, harm ... and possibly permanent damage, typically from a CNS or muscular event, that was confirmed by a doctor. Anyone saying otherwise really needs to stop making it up.
But that's a risk some of us are willing to take ... within reason. And that's the problem ... right there! That more is better and has no risk. It's not difficult to find study after study showing, just like with GWS, that CD4 overreaction and resulting autoimmunity is not only easy to find, but to compare to prior bloodwork. It's not caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) either, it's caused by adjuvants.
Which is why, more and more ... the more shots you get in a short period, with those with adjuvants, the more you increase your risk. And we should really, really start looking at if we really need adjuvants in vaccines ... especially the ones that can kick the living sh-- out of your immune system, let alone if you get multiple. That's why a lot of people, and I knew most people, who got the 2-3 shot combos last fall ... ended up getting diseased from SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).
And the people who had the worst reactions from SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and Ad-mRNA vaccines alike ... were people who had already recovered from Alpha or Delta, and never need a shot, let alone the mandates increased risk. In fact, they were already better protected than with the shot, let alone the shot alone. The shot introduced an adjuvant when their immunity system and defenses were already weakened. Maybe, just maybe, we should look at using adjuvant-free vaccines ... when someone has already recovered.
But nope ... no changes, "Safe and effective, get it every 3-6 months so you can 'keep your defenses up.'" If you say otherwise, you will be censored and even censured if you're a professional. Doesn't matter if you're one of the top experts at the FDA, and a well known pro-vaccine advocate. You're ****ed.
| Autoimmune phenomena | Vaccine type |
|---|---|
| Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia | Adenovirus vector vaccine and mRNA vaccine |
| Immune thrombocytopenic purpura | mRNA vaccine |
| Autoimmune liver diseases | mRNA vaccine and Adenovirus vector vaccine |
| Guillain–Barré syndrome | mRNA vaccine and Adenovirus vector vaccine |
| IgA nephropathy | mRNA vaccine |
| Autoimmune polyarthritis | mRNA vaccine |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | mRNA vaccine and Adenovirus vector vaccine |
| Graves' disease | mRNA vaccine |
| Type 1 diabetes mellitus | mRNA vaccine |
| Systemic lupus erythematosus | Adenovirus vector vaccine |
Data Doesn’t Support New COVID-19 Booster Shots for Most, Says Expert
It’s time to rethink the blanket recommendation for giving the new Omicron booster to everyone
FDA vaccine advisers 'disappointed' and 'angry' that early data about new Covid-19 booster shot wasn't presented for review last year | CNN
Some vaccine advisers to the federal government say they're "disappointed" and "angry" that government scientists and the pharmaceutical company Moderna didn't present a set of infection data on the company's new Covid-19 booster during meetings last year when the advisers discussed whether the...
Last edited:
Geez. That dude on the right is fat and ugly. Where did you dig up that gem?
Since the ****tards -- those who will never admit they were wrong, and berrated all of us objective individuals who read experts at the BMJ and elsewhere, even the FDA and the recent FOIA releases that prove data was withheld, and then poor when finally released (we made data-free, scientifically-wrong, decisions) -- continue to want to fill up the scrollbar, I'll do so equally ... with solid information.
Echos of Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) ... Still Ignored Today Too
Looks like adjuvants, like squalene, are the continued 'battleground.' This was a big focus with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS), but it ended up going nowhere. A big reason is that the UK, US and other governments repeatedly stated said they did not use squalene in their Gulf War-specific cocktails.
The truth is more of a mix (more on that in a bit).
But one thing that was proven in the studies is that some people just have issues with squalene and select, other adjuvants. It's why people who weren't even deployed to the Gulf had issues, while others who were did not. That's why the stigma of anyone with GWS, which is easily proven, medical, is still that there's no 'direct answer,' so they are not believed.
Sound familiar? Anyone claiming harm, loss of bodily functions or even death of a family member over SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and Ad-mRNA vaccines, are not believed, just like with GWS. And without a 'smoking gun,' this is likely to be the case for years.
There is even the TILT theory now, that it's other toxic chemicals. And that could definitely factor into things. But still, the CD4 and adjuvant studies remain, and are not disputed.
Adjuvants Are Good ... Until They Are Not (and Medically Proven To Be a Problem for Some)
Now adjuvants have real benefits, like stimulating antibody production, and that's why they are used in some vaccines. But any time you stimulate the immune system, there is a risk. The key?
People repeadly vaccinated, such as the result of not 'keeping up their schedule' prior, were more suseptible to white blood cell CD4 stimulation and eventually developed autoimmune issues. This happened, commonly, in the military, and the Gulf War and other deployments forced them into getting multiple shots ... often mandated, unlike the civilian sector.
Again, it was proven that pretty much 95%+ of those who were long-term ill with GWS definitely had antibody reactions and autoimmune issues surrounding CD4 and adjuvants. Which brings us back to repeat, let alone combo, vaccinations.
The FDA Has No Power to Limit Vaccines and Outlaw Combinational Vaccines
The biggest regulatory problem is that the FDA only regulates individual shots. They do not control schedule, which is the CDC. Also and most importantly, the FDA cannot prevent 'combo' shots and 'shot busses' with unqualified technicians who make people sign waivers and other legal 'hold harmless.'
The FDA review teams have repeatedly brought up the fact that multiple vaccines should not be given at the same time.
E.g., they previously recommended influenza vaccines not be given with shinges vaccines for the elderly at the same time, but two (2) weeks apart, and -- for further mitigation of more local reactions -- in different arms.
They even and specifically warned if you did within the same 72 hours, and it would inhibit creation if antibodies for both as well, causing split-focus and other aspects -- defeating the purpose of getting either vaccine, let alone both at the same time, in the first place -- as well as overwhelm the immune system even more.
And now we have the triple-shots ... VZL/VZV Shingles, Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) at the same time! Great job!
This continues to not only completely gone ignored, despite FDA warnings -- much like all the various 'warning signs' of complications with young people (under 40, and especially minors) after their first mRNA shot (part of the reason the FDA review panels unianimously shot down any vaccines for kids) -- but ... the CDC even promotes it as 'better' as in 'one shot for all.' And shot busses love the revenue margins.
So ... they are popular, for fiscal reasons, not medical ones ... actually, at odds with the FDA's testing and recommendations.
Boosting Over and Over Is Not Viable ... It's Universally Agreed Among Experts
The transcripts of the FDA review panels all this past year have been chirping with this, especially how short any efficiency, most of them being statistically insignificant, the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines have been. They take weeks to build up antibodies, then seemingly lose effectiveness within a couple months. The level of punishment on the immune system is unsustainable, and you'd be hard pressed to find any expert at the FDA -- even today, after all the resignations over prior ignorance by leadership and the administraion -- that disagrees.
mRNA vaccines have used squalene in their lipid bubble and to increase white blood CD4 interaction. It's not just a short-term issue. If someone has an allergy, it's going to show up... and not just short-term. And to get it over and over, instead of once a year, or once every 5 years, it's going to continue to cause problems. Squalene is used in Influenza Virus Vaccines as well, and most researchers recommend not getting the same Flu straings in a vaccine every year, but mixing it up.
This is because of Imprinting, which is now looking like reality with not just Flu vaccines, but COVID too. That's why shooting up with the updated booster is no better than getting the prior. Even new studies on Dtap and related tetanus is showing no benefit. E.g., the EU EMA found that if you get your 3-combo MMR, Dtap, et al. as a kid ... you don't even need any tetanus shots as an adult. There is no benefit.
Continuing to Throw Caution to the Wind ... Believing More Is Better (Maybe Profit?)
It amazes me how much we now assume things work and aren't an issue, including being shot up as much as possible, and people want to see proof to the contrary that it's not ... and even when it's provided, they refues to believe it. Allegedly no one has had any long-term complications, and definitely no one has died, from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination ... at least not definitively proven.
Well, that's immediately horsesh-- because many of us know at least one co-worker or family member who has had a poor reaction that caused great, although hopefully temporary, harm ... and possibly permanent damage, typically from a CNS or muscular event, that was confirmed by a doctor. Anyone saying otherwise really needs to stop making it up.
But that's a risk some of us are willing to take ... within reason. And that's the problem ... right there! That more is better and has no risk. It's not difficult to find study after study showing, just like with GWS, that CD4 overreaction and resulting autoimmunity is not only easy to find, but to compare to prior bloodwork. It's not caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) either, it's caused by adjuvants.
Which is why, more and more ... the more shots you get in a short period, with those with adjuvants, the more you increase your risk. And we should really, really start looking at if we really need adjuvants in vaccines ... especially the ones that can kick the living sh-- out of your immune system, let alone if you get multiple. That's why a lot of people, and I knew most people, who got the 2-3 shot combos last fall ... ended up getting diseased from SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).
And the people who had the worst reactions from SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and Ad-mRNA vaccines alike ... were people who had already recovered from Alpha or Delta, and never need a shot, let alone the mandates increased risk. In fact, they were already better protected than with the shot, let alone the shot alone. The shot introduced an adjuvant when their immunity system and defenses were already weakened. Maybe, just maybe, we should look at using adjuvant-free vaccines ... when someone has already recovered.
But nope ... no changes, "Safe and effective, get it every 3-6 months so you can 'keep your defenses up.'" If you say otherwise, you will be censored and even censured if you're a professional. Doesn't matter if you're one of the top experts at the FDA, and a well known pro-vaccine advocate. You're ****ed.
Data Doesn’t Support New COVID-19 Booster Shots for Most, Says Expert
It’s time to rethink the blanket recommendation for giving the new Omicron booster to everyone
FDA vaccine advisers 'disappointed' and 'angry' that early data about new Covid-19 booster shot wasn't presented for review last year | CNN
Some vaccine advisers to the federal government say they're "disappointed" and "angry" that government scientists and the pharmaceutical company Moderna didn't present a set of infection data on the company's new Covid-19 booster during meetings last year when the advisers discussed whether the...
1,358 words 8,066 characters
Your text might contain writing issues - Check now
Since the ****tards -- those who will never admit they were wrong, and berrated all of us objective individuals who read experts at the BMJ and elsewhere, even the FDA and the recent FOIA releases that prove data was withheld, and then poor when finally released (we made data-free, scientifically-wrong, decisions) -- continue to want to fill up the scrollbar, I'll do so equally ... with solid information.
Echos of Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) ... Still Ignored Today Too
Looks like adjuvants, like squalene, are the continued 'battleground.' This was a big focus with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS), but it ended up going nowhere. A big reason is that the UK, US and other governments repeatedly stated said they did not use squalene in their Gulf War-specific cocktails.
The truth is more of a mix (more on that in a bit).
But one thing that was proven in the studies is that some people just have issues with squalene and select, other adjuvants. It's why people who weren't even deployed to the Gulf had issues, while others who were did not. That's why the stigma of anyone with GWS, which is easily proven, medical, is still that there's no 'direct answer,' so they are not believed.
Sound familiar? Anyone claiming harm, loss of bodily functions or even death of a family member over SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and Ad-mRNA vaccines, are not believed, just like with GWS. And without a 'smoking gun,' this is likely to be the case for years.
There is even the TILT theory now, that it's other toxic chemicals. And that could definitely factor into things. But still, the CD4 and adjuvant studies remain, and are not disputed.
Adjuvants Are Good ... Until They Are Not (and Medically Proven To Be a Problem for Some)
Now adjuvants have real benefits, like stimulating antibody production, and that's why they are used in some vaccines. But any time you stimulate the immune system, there is a risk. The key?
People repeadly vaccinated, such as the result of not 'keeping up their schedule' prior, were more suseptible to white blood cell CD4 stimulation and eventually developed autoimmune issues. This happened, commonly, in the military, and the Gulf War and other deployments forced them into getting multiple shots ... often mandated, unlike the civilian sector.
Again, it was proven that pretty much 95%+ of those who were long-term ill with GWS definitely had antibody reactions and autoimmune issues surrounding CD4 and adjuvants. Which brings us back to repeat, let alone combo, vaccinations.
The FDA Has No Power to Limit Vaccines and Outlaw Combinational Vaccines
The biggest regulatory problem is that the FDA only regulates individual shots. They do not control schedule, which is the CDC. Also and most importantly, the FDA cannot prevent 'combo' shots and 'shot busses' with unqualified technicians who make people sign waivers and other legal 'hold harmless.'
The FDA review teams have repeatedly brought up the fact that multiple vaccines should not be given at the same time.
E.g., they previously recommended influenza vaccines not be given with shinges vaccines for the elderly at the same time, but two (2) weeks apart, and -- for further mitigation of more local reactions -- in different arms.
They even and specifically warned if you did within the same 72 hours, and it would inhibit creation if antibodies for both as well, causing split-focus and other aspects -- defeating the purpose of getting either vaccine, let alone both at the same time, in the first place -- as well as overwhelm the immune system even more.
And now we have the triple-shots ... VZL/VZV Shingles, Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) at the same time! Great job!
This continues to not only completely gone ignored, despite FDA warnings -- much like all the various 'warning signs' of complications with young people (under 40, and especially minors) after their first mRNA shot (part of the reason the FDA review panels unianimously shot down any vaccines for kids) -- but ... the CDC even promotes it as 'better' as in 'one shot for all.' And shot busses love the revenue margins.
So ... they are popular, for fiscal reasons, not medical ones ... actually, at odds with the FDA's testing and recommendations.
Boosting Over and Over Is Not Viable ... It's Universally Agreed Among Experts
The transcripts of the FDA review panels all this past year have been chirping with this, especially how short any efficiency, most of them being statistically insignificant, the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccines have been. They take weeks to build up antibodies, then seemingly lose effectiveness within a couple months. The level of punishment on the immune system is unsustainable, and you'd be hard pressed to find any expert at the FDA -- even today, after all the resignations over prior ignorance by leadership and the administraion -- that disagrees.
mRNA vaccines have used squalene in their lipid bubble and to increase white blood CD4 interaction. It's not just a short-term issue. If someone has an allergy, it's going to show up... and not just short-term. And to get it over and over, instead of once a year, or once every 5 years, it's going to continue to cause problems. Squalene is used in Influenza Virus Vaccines as well, and most researchers recommend not getting the same Flu straings in a vaccine every year, but mixing it up.
This is because of Imprinting, which is now looking like reality with not just Flu vaccines, but COVID too. That's why shooting up with the updated booster is no better than getting the prior. Even new studies on Dtap and related tetanus is showing no benefit. E.g., the EU EMA found that if you get your 3-combo MMR, Dtap, et al. as a kid ... you don't even need any tetanus shots as an adult. There is no benefit.
Continuing to Throw Caution to the Wind ... Believing More Is Better (Maybe Profit?)
It amazes me how much we now assume things work and aren't an issue, including being shot up as much as possible, and people want to see proof to the contrary that it's not ... and even when it's provided, they refues to believe it. Allegedly no one has had any long-term complications, and definitely no one has died, from SARS-CoV-2 vaccination ... at least not definitively proven.
Well, that's immediately horsesh-- because many of us know at least one co-worker or family member who has had a poor reaction that caused great, although hopefully temporary, harm ... and possibly permanent damage, typically from a CNS or muscular event, that was confirmed by a doctor. Anyone saying otherwise really needs to stop making it up.
But that's a risk some of us are willing to take ... within reason. And that's the problem ... right there! That more is better and has no risk. It's not difficult to find study after study showing, just like with GWS, that CD4 overreaction and resulting autoimmunity is not only easy to find, but to compare to prior bloodwork. It's not caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) either, it's caused by adjuvants.
Which is why, more and more ... the more shots you get in a short period, with those with adjuvants, the more you increase your risk. And we should really, really start looking at if we really need adjuvants in vaccines ... especially the ones that can kick the living sh-- out of your immune system, let alone if you get multiple. That's why a lot of people, and I knew most people, who got the 2-3 shot combos last fall ... ended up getting diseased from SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).
And the people who had the worst reactions from SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and Ad-mRNA vaccines alike ... were people who had already recovered from Alpha or Delta, and never need a shot, let alone the mandates increased risk. In fact, they were already better protected than with the shot, let alone the shot alone. The shot introduced an adjuvant when their immunity system and defenses were already weakened. Maybe, just maybe, we should look at using adjuvant-free vaccines ... when someone has already recovered.
But nope ... no changes, "Safe and effective, get it every 3-6 months so you can 'keep your defenses up.'" If you say otherwise, you will be censored and even censured if you're a professional. Doesn't matter if you're one of the top experts at the FDA, and a well known pro-vaccine advocate. You're ****ed.
Autoimmune phenomena Vaccine type Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia Adenovirus vector vaccine and mRNA vaccine Immune thrombocytopenic purpura mRNA vaccine Autoimmune liver diseases mRNA vaccine and Adenovirus vector vaccine Guillain–Barré syndrome mRNA vaccine and Adenovirus vector vaccine IgA nephropathy mRNA vaccine Autoimmune polyarthritis mRNA vaccine Rheumatoid arthritis mRNA vaccine and Adenovirus vector vaccine Graves' disease mRNA vaccine Type 1 diabetes mellitus mRNA vaccine Systemic lupus erythematosus Adenovirus vector vaccine
Data Doesn’t Support New COVID-19 Booster Shots for Most, Says Expert
It’s time to rethink the blanket recommendation for giving the new Omicron booster to everyone
FDA vaccine advisers 'disappointed' and 'angry' that early data about new Covid-19 booster shot wasn't presented for review last year | CNN
Some vaccine advisers to the federal government say they're "disappointed" and "angry" that government scientists and the pharmaceutical company Moderna didn't present a set of infection data on the company's new Covid-19 booster during meetings last year when the advisers discussed whether the...
Show me a study that vaccinated, healthcare workers spread COVID the most. That’s your bogus claim amongst many others
Still waiting
You don’t have a study. Shocking
Notice that the salad dodger has, um, dodged this thread: https://ucf.forums.rivals.com/threa...n-deaths-separating-fact-from-fiction.108222/
I don’t know who the dude on the right is but he doesn’t look healthy at all. BMI of at least 50.
Dude ... I posted dozens of statisticians prior! But worse than that ...
You're still claiming the vaccinated spread less than the unvaccinated?! Really?!
Don't you remember all the things the vaccinate were allowed to do in May-June 2021, that unvaccinated were not?! All the congregations and eating out and other things? Close proximity?!
What the **** do you think the studies that only showed a 6% reduction in spread due to lockdowns used in their models?! The fact is the vaccinated comingled 5x more than the unvaccinated in May-June 2021 ...
Many of these were via the contact and vacines tracing by Big Tech that proved the vaccinated were exposing themselves 5x as much as the unvaccinated! It's not even disputed! It's been used in study after study on why lockdowns didn't work! Especially when we let the vaccinated go back to normal ... right as Delta spread!
Resulting in the massive Delta outbreak by July 2021!
You literally are stupidly arguing the vaccinated spread less than the unvaccinated?! Even worse, the CDC refused to even track breakthrough infections, even disease, of the vaccinated after April 2021! Even both Harvard and Yale openly criticized the CDC for that!
And you're still doing this in 2023?!
You, Firm, Shuck, Joe ... all your chronic ****tards are still asserting the vaccinated spread less ... and all of you also, orginally stated even said those who recovered still spread more than the vaccinated ... until it became abundantly clearly the CDC was lying by late 2021, and publishing fraudulent statistics (and had to admit it by 2022).
The vaccinated acted stupid in May-June 2021 ... just like the US gov't said they could. And that's what happened.
Stay focused. I know it’s hard for you since you’re basically a mentally unstable indigent living in a manufactured home in Alabama
Show me a study that vaccinated, healthcare workers spread COVID the most. That’s your bogus claim amongst many others
Still waiting
You don’t have a study. Shocking
UCFBS said:
You know I'm a GNU/Linux guy, right? I'm kinda an idiot when it comes to Windows. I don't run it, I don't support it ... other than Ansible and via MONAD (now known as PowerShell), remotely.
Working in I.T. with NO BACKGROUND IN MEDICINE, IMMUNOLOGY, MICROBIOLOGY, VACCINE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND IN THIS CASE RESPIRATORY SCIENCE
That’s why, I will continue to discredit you for what you are.
Anti-government, anti-Vaxxer, anti-BIG PHARMA who is vaccinated
I have heard that people with BMIs in the fifties have a hard time reading.
Higher ivermectin dose, longer duration still futile for COVID, trial finds
@Boston.Knight ?
@KNIGHTTIME^ ?
Parade Float @UCFBS ?
