And the Jews want them to die.They don't even want the Jews to leave and give them the land. They want the Jews to die.
And the Jews want them to die.They don't even want the Jews to leave and give them the land. They want the Jews to die.
This is ridiculous. Israel has active troops all over the region. They aren't taking a defensive stand against attackers, they are actively waging war all over the middle east. The Israel as a pacifist defending itself picture you're trying to paint is just false.Yup.
Israel just wants to be left alone. The terrorist organizations (and in turn, some countries), want Israel to DIE. You think their hatred for the USA is bad? That's nothing compared for their hatred of Israel.
This is ridiculous. Israel has active troops all over the region. They aren't taking a defensive stand against attackers, they are actively waging war all over the middle east. The Israel as a pacifist defending itself picture you're trying to paint is just false.
This is ridiculous. Israel has active troops all over the region. They aren't taking a defensive stand against attackers, they are actively waging war all over the middle east. The Israel as a pacifist defending itself picture you're trying to paint is just false.
This is ridiculous. Israel has active troops all over the region. They aren't taking a defensive stand against attackers, they are actively waging war all over the middle east. The Israel as a pacifist defending itself picture you're trying to paint is just false.
You do know that over 20% of Israel's population is Muslim, right? And a lot of them are refugees from Palestine.And the Jews want them to die.
Not every country in the region but where ever and whenever there is conflict they find a way to get involved and attack the countries that they don't like. They just smoked a bunch of Iranians while hiding behind the USA in Syria.LMAO
Israel has soldiers in Egypt? Jordan? Saudi? Kuwait? Iraq? Iran? UAE? Places that don’t even admit Jews into the country?
Hilarious. Care to qualify this? It’s the most absurd claim I’ve ever heard. If you can’t wuakify this doozy of a lie then it’s probably time you vacate the board already
how often do you, me, 85, btbones, fab, crazyhole, and bqknight all agree on something?When liberals and conservatives are in agreement you know you are on the wrong side of the argument.
Not every country in the region but where ever and whenever there is conflict they find a way to get involved and attack the countries that they don't like. They just smoked a bunch of Iranians while hiding behind the USA in Syria.
Not every country in the region but where ever and whenever there is conflict they find a way to get involved and attack the countries that they don't like. They just smoked a bunch of Iranians while hiding behind the USA in Syria.
i doubt fried chicken actually believes any of the garbage he types. hes just a terrible troll
i doubt fried chicken actually believes any of the garbage he types. hes just a terrible troll
hes claimed to be an economist. hes claimed to be a republican. hes claimed a lot of stupid crap.He isn't even a troll. Just a typical leftist provocateur who repeats anything his political leaders tell him to.
Now that I have him on ignore, it is interesting to see the discussion change for no reason... and then realize fc must have made some dumbass post again. Ignore truly can be a wonderful feature.i doubt fried chicken actually believes any of the garbage he types. hes just a terrible troll
i doubt fried chicken actually believes any of the garbage he types. hes just a terrible troll
That's typical of every political board anymore. People have lost the ability to discuss, disagree, and more than anything change their minds as new information is presented. FC is an antagonist so it exacerbates the situation, but it makes for better discussions when people don't ignore or immediately dismiss one another.lmao @ all these red hat snowflakes putting people on ignore. Just go join stormfront or something if you want to have a discussion purely with others who share your exact same ignorant snowflake views, but don't shit on UCF's reputation by creating a massive ignorant circle jerk on this forum that used to be entertaining before you drove all the good posters away.
That's typical of every political board anymore. People have lost the ability to discuss, disagree, and more than anything change their minds as new information is presented. FC is an antagonist so it exacerbates the situation, but it makes for better discussions when people don't ignore or immediately dismiss one another.
It's interesting to me that most of us were told at one point or another not to discuss sex, religion, and politics, but those are probably the 3 biggest issues we have communicating with each other today. It would be better if people were taught how to have those discussions instead of avoiding them.
Sure, FC goes over the top especially in his titles, but sadly studies have shown that people specifically double down on their (wrongly held) beliefs when presented with evidence to the contrary, and this board proves that every day.
The NRA thread was a perfect example, FC a dick but had legit evidence showing some very worrisome information about our country and what was the response? Multiple immature name calling and flat out avoidance of the topic by the red hatters. Ignorance really is the only way to describe it, and it's terrifying these people have the same voting ability as you and I.
That's typical of every political board anymore. People have lost the ability to discuss, disagree, and more than anything change their minds as new information is presented. FC is an antagonist so it exacerbates the situation, but it makes for better discussions when people don't ignore or immediately dismiss one another.
It's interesting to me that most of us were told at one point or another not to discuss sex, religion, and politics, but those are probably the 3 biggest issues we have communicating with each other today. It would be better if people were taught how to have those discussions instead of avoiding them.
Pretty much everyone here can discuss and disagree civilly. There are just two people that can't have a debate without getting into a tizzy and throwing temper tantrums. There is no reason to waste time with people like that.
Pretty much everyone here can discuss and disagree civilly. There are just two people that can't have a debate without getting into a tizzy and throwing temper tantrums. There is no reason to waste time with people like that.
You think my titles are over the top? I put a lot of thought and time into them.Sure, FC goes over the top especially in his titles, but sadly studies have shown that people specifically double down on their (wrongly held) beliefs when presented with evidence to the contrary, and this board proves that every day.
The NRA thread was a perfect example, FC a dick but had legit evidence showing some very worrisome information about our country and what was the response? Multiple immature name calling and flat out avoidance of the topic by the red hatters. Ignorance really is the only way to describe it, and it's terrifying these people have the same voting ability as you and I.
You think my titles are over the top? I put a lot of thought and time into them.
The problem is that no one is planning on changing their mind on any of this. I put out legit evidence of Donald Trump being supported to the tune of as much as 10% of his total campaign donations coming from Russia in a way that lets the red hats know they are supporting a lying crook.
Instead of changing who they support they call fake news or whatever but they're in a pickle on this one since it's a finding from a GOP led Senate Intel Committee. They still can't admit how messed up this all is so they just call names and blame me.
The truth is that they will never give up on Trump because they are dug in too much. If I can get them to ignore me because my facts make them uncomfortable then I'll be happy because it means that deep down they know they've hurt America and they can't stand to be reminded of that regularly.
You think my titles are over the top? I put a lot of thought and time into them.
The problem is that no one is planning on changing their mind on any of this. I put out legit evidence of Donald Trump being supported to the tune of as much as 10% of his total campaign donations coming from Russia in a way that lets the red hats know they are supporting a lying crook.
Instead of changing who they support they call fake news or whatever but they're in a pickle on this one since it's a finding from a GOP led Senate Intel Committee. They still can't admit how messed up this all is so they just call names and blame me.
The truth is that they will never give up on Trump because they are dug in too much. If I can get them to ignore me because my facts make them uncomfortable then I'll be happy because it means that deep down they know they've hurt America and they can't stand to be reminded of that regularly.
The first paragraph of the article you posted on the NRA and the campaign donations said this ...
"Documents suggest the Kremlin used the NRA to offer the campaign a back channel to Moscow—including a potential meeting between Trump and Vladimir Putin—and might have secretly funded Trump’s campaign,"
Is this the "legit evidence" you were talking about? (notice the words i bold and underlined for you). You have to learn the difference between fact and opinion. A simple logic class at UCF would help with that. Also, when you quote The Daily Beast on an article you must also recognize that it is a far left leaning publication .... and thus ... people may read that article with some skepticism.
Evidence doesn't have to be DNA rock solid to be evidence. A lot of evidence is of varying strength which is why they use phrases like that because the alternative is that they type "Trump is guilty of X" which no one is ready to do yet.The first paragraph of the article you posted on the NRA and the campaign donations said this ...
"Documents suggest the Kremlin used the NRA to offer the campaign a back channel to Moscow—including a potential meeting between Trump and Vladimir Putin—and might have secretly funded Trump’s campaign,"
Is this the "legit evidence" you were talking about? (notice the words i bold and underlined for you). You have to learn the difference between fact and opinion. A simple logic class at UCF would help with that. Also, when you quote The Daily Beast on an article you must also recognize that it is a far left leaning publication .... and thus ... people may read that article with some skepticism.
OkEvidence doesn't have to be DNA rock solid to be evidence. A lot of evidence is of varying strength which is why they use phrases like that because the alternative is that they type "Trump is guilty of X" which no one is ready to do yet.
It doesn't mean that nothing happened it just means they need to dig more for proof, which I have full faith they are doing.
Evidence doesn't have to be DNA rock solid to be evidence. A lot of evidence is of varying strength which is why they use phrases like that because the alternative is that they type "Trump is guilty of X" which no one is ready to do yet.
It doesn't mean that nothing happened it just means they need to dig more for proof, which I have full faith they are doing.
Nothing will ever be enough for you people but if Hillary tied her shoes wrong you'd talk about it for months.I agree that it doesn't mean that nothing happened ... it also don't mean that something happened .... but you did say FC had "legit evidence" about the campaign donations ... when in fact FC had a liberal publication making assumptions based on a senate report that was, at best, inconclusive in many topics.