ADVERTISEMENT

How are you preparing for the upcoming Civil War?

firm_bizzle

Todd's Tiki Bar
Gold Member
Jul 24, 2008
42,403
43,140
113
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">....If the Democrats are successful in removing the President from office (which they will never be), it will cause a Civil War like fracture in this Nation from which our Country will never heal.” Pastor Robert Jeffress, <a href="https://twitter.com/FoxNews?ref_src=twsrc^tfw">@FoxNews</a></p>&mdash; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="">September 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
That's a Civil Conflict.

I'm talking about the Civil War between the Trump States and non-Trump states.

Do you not know what a "Civil War like fracture" implies or are you just looking for a trolljob here?
 
no one really wants a civil war. that would be absolutely terrible. especially for the liberal states.
 
non-Trump states would lose bigly.
the amount of guns in this country by civilians would field one of the largest armies in the world. there are several dems that love their guns too, but most of those guns are in the hands of conservatives. either way it wouldnt be pretty.
 
x28s3jncppp31.jpg


At least we can get a few chuckles before this deranged child in the white house destroys our country.
 
Love the cartoon, ninja.

Unfortunately, I doubt HesJustAFriendISwear will get it. :)
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">....If the Democrats are successful in removing the President from office (which they will never be), it will cause a Civil War like fracture in this Nation from which our Country will never heal.” Pastor Robert Jeffress, <a href="https://twitter.com/FoxNews?ref_src=twsrc^tfw">@FoxNews</a></p>&mdash; Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href=" ">September 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Can we get some legislation to ban the President from having his own Twitter account? I'm thinking that would pass both houses unanimously.
 
It should terrify every American no matter what party you are that somehow the whistleblower blower skirted the rules of first hand knowledge and coincidentally can claim whistleblower status. This is the second coup attempt by our non elected and faceless intelligence apparatus. First the FBI, now the CIA.
 
Last edited:
It should terrify every American no matter what party you are that somehow the whistleblower blower rules were changed recently and coincidentally a CIA agent who did not even have first hand experience can claim whistleblower status and try to take down a sitting president. This is the second coup attempt by our non elected and faceless intelligence apparatus. First the FBI, now the CIA.
The whistleblower is practically irrelevant at this point, as a result of Trumps own admissions. Got anything else?
 
It should terrify every American no matter what party you are that somehow the whistleblower blower skirted the rules of first hand knowledge and coincidentally can claim whistleblower status. This is the second coup attempt by our non elected and faceless intelligence apparatus. First the FBI, now the CIA.

You mean the person who submitted a complaint through the CIA initially that Barr and the DOJ quashed? You and your QAnon conspiracy theories should head back to 4chan where you belong.
 
It should terrify every American no matter what party you are that somehow the whistleblower blower skirted the rules of first hand knowledge and coincidentally can claim whistleblower status. This is the second coup attempt by our non elected and faceless intelligence apparatus. First the FBI, now the CIA.

Can you imagine being this goddamn stupid? That out of this whole huge mess, you are most concerned about the whistle blower?

Holy fuking shit I can honestly say I can't wait until you people die off from old age. You are personally destroying this great country.
 
It should terrify every American no matter what party you are that somehow the whistleblower blower skirted the rules of first hand knowledge and coincidentally can claim whistleblower status. This is the second coup attempt by our non elected and faceless intelligence apparatus. First the FBI, now the CIA.
The Whistleblower does have first hand knowledge.

When we find them, should we hang them or shoot them?
 
It should terrify every American no matter what party you are that somehow the whistleblower blower skirted the rules of first hand knowledge and coincidentally can claim whistleblower status. This is the second coup attempt by our non elected and faceless intelligence apparatus.
According to the Congressional testimony of the Intelligence Director, the whistleblower followed all the proper procedures...was deemed to have 'credible' information...was patient -- and apparently cool & calm -- with the delay in having it forwarded to Congress because the Intelligence Director submitted it first to the very White House that was being accused of the crime...and lastly, the whistleblower's major allegation has been confirmed by the White House's own partial transcript.

So please explain exactly how this "Hey, I think this is against the law" red flag whistleblower report is actually a 'coup attempt' for crying out loud?!?!?!?!

Jesus, you're as crazy as Trump. Earth to Sir Galahad: The U.S. is not a dictatorship.
 
According to the Congressional testimony of the Intelligence Director, the whistleblower followed all the proper procedures...was deemed to have 'credible' information...was patient -- and apparently cool & calm -- with the delay in having it forwarded to Congress because the Intelligence Director submitted it first to the very White House that was being accused of the crime...and lastly, the whistleblower's major allegation has been confirmed by the White House's own partial transcript.

So please explain exactly how this "Hey, I think this is against the law" red flag whistleblower report is actually a 'coup attempt' for crying out loud?!?!?!?!

Jesus, you're as crazy as Trump. Earth to Sir Galahad: The U.S. is not a dictatorship.

Truly disturbing that people like Gal are allowed to vote. He should be in a mental institution so he can't harm anyone if he actually believes half of the literally insane conspiracy theories he spews on here.
 
The Whistleblower does have first hand knowledge.

When we find them, should we hang them or shoot them?
That depends what you read, his filing of the complaint said he did have first hand knowledge, his written complaint said he did not.
 
According to the Congressional testimony of the Intelligence Director, the whistleblower followed all the proper procedures...was deemed to have 'credible' information...was patient -- and apparently cool & calm -- with the delay in having it forwarded to Congress because the Intelligence Director submitted it first to the very White House that was being accused of the crime...and lastly, the whistleblower's major allegation has been confirmed by the White House's own partial transcript.

So please explain exactly how this "Hey, I think this is against the law" red flag whistleblower report is actually a 'coup attempt' for crying out loud?!?!?!?!

Jesus, you're as crazy as Trump. Earth to Sir Galahad: The U.S. is not a dictatorship.
All of it except for the quid pro quo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
If you don’t know at this point, you shouldn’t be posting in this thread.
Fact:

The ICIG said the whistleblower claimed he had first hand knowledge.

Fact:
The actual complaint did not have first hand knowledge?

Basically the whistleblower has already been caught in a lie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
This lame 'the whistleblower didn't have first hand knowledge' defense of Trump is such bullsh*t.

Think about it: Let's say ten close colleagues of mine witnessed Johnny commit murder. But, as you might expect, they were all too scared to say anything for fear of retaliation. I decide to anonymously let the proper authorities know. According to Sir Galahad, my efforts to see that justice is done should have been ignored because I had chosen to speak up for the people who had witnessed the crime but were too chickensh*t to say anything?

The most laughable thing about the "he didn't have first-hand knowledge" complaint is that the whistleblower described what the partial White House transcript confirmed. If not for this whistleblower, would the American people have ever seen this partial transcript?

BTW, seeing the word-for-word transcript of that phone conversation that is currently filed away in a top secret electronic file (along with similar Presidential conversations with Putin and the Saudi Prince) will probably require a Supreme Court ruling. Given the incriminating nature of the partial transcript that the WH released, one can only imagine what the actual transcript will reveal.)
 
If you don’t know at this point, you shouldn’t be posting in this thread.
Fact:

The ICIG said the whistleblower claimed he had first hand knowledge.

Fact:
The actual complaint did not have first hand knowledge?

Basically the whistleblower has already been caught in a lie.
Trump has already corroborated the whistleblowers story. What part of this aren’t you getting?
 
Fact:

The ICIG said the whistleblower claimed he had first hand knowledge.

Fact:
The actual complaint did not have first hand knowledge?

Basically the whistleblower has already been caught in a lie.

Go read the DNI's letter. It's very clear, unlike how you're trying to portray it.

https://www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Docu...on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints.pdf

"The Complainant on the form he or she submitted on August 12, 2019 in fact checked two relevant boxes: The first box stated that, “I have personal and/or direct knowledge of events or records involved”; and the second box stated that, “Other employees have told me about events or records involved.” As part of his determination that the urgent concern appeared credible, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that the Complainant had official and authorized access to the information and sources referenced in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix, including direct knowledge of certain alleged conduct, and that the Complainant has subject matter expertise related to much of the material information provided in the Complainant’s Letter and Classified Appendix. In short, the ICIG did not find that the Complainant could “provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions,” which would have made it much harder, and significantly less likely, for the Inspector General to determine in a 14-calendar day review period that the complaint “appeared credible,” as required by statute. Therefore, although the Complainant’s Letter acknowledged that the Complainant was not a direct witness to the President’s July 25, 2019, telephone call with the Ukrainian President, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community determined that other information obtained during the ICIG’s preliminary review supported the Complainant’s allegations."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT