LEFTIST PEDO & GENERAL IDIOCY MEGATHREAD
- Thread starter _glaciers
- Start date
The one thing that's bothering me is ... did these people actually create the pornography? They keep calling it 'sexual abuse,' but were they even involved with the creation of the materials?
The law is predicated on the fact that a minor is abused by the pictures being taken, and that's why it's illegal. But those who didn't even take the pictures and weren't with the kids should get far lower sentences than those who did.
That's what has been regularly missing from these discussions, and I'd like some clarity. Did she just give lower sentences to those who were merely in posession of or even distributing existing child pornography? Or were they actually creating it, and taking advantage of the kids?
We Libertarians want very strong sentences for the latter, but we're tired of associating the former with the same. Especially in the case of countries where women can model nude at age 16, like the UK until the US forced them to change to 18 in the age of the Internet.
8) Joe
Stuck on 37 words 🤣🤣🤣🤣
🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜
🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜
🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜
🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜🦜
And as a libertarian, you are encouraging the slippery slope. Don't make excuses for anything that involves sexual assault on a child due to "muh freedoms".
One more thing about KBJ, as a libertarian, how do you feel about this question?
Sen Ted Cruz: “Do you hold a position on whether individuals possess Natural Rights, yes or no?”
Justice Jackson: “I do not hold a position on whether individuals possess Natural Rights.”
But the viewers didn't assult the child in the same way the people who actually took the photographs. This is my #1 problem with Conservatives, "Everything is an equal sin." Well, that comes back to bite you too.
All the rest of her answers are what they are and I don’t think any of them are inherently disqualifying. This one, however, is the one that I don’t think I could get past. I don’t think that you can have no position on natural rights and sit on the SCOTUS.
Its probably a good indicator of causation. I'd be interested to see the gap between religious people and atheists as well, because I'm willing to bet the spread is even wider.
This has failed and been repealed in nearly every country that it’s been tried. This is either supremely stupid or intentionally destructive.
It's calculated. Push more money offshore so it's easier to reset the currency at different valuations based on what and who you are.
Look at the 2 lovers getting off^^^
Apparently narco-tourism wasn’t filling the state coffers well enough so they are adding another form of tourism to their portfolio.
Looks like the pedo group is at it again.
So.. how many children have @KNIGHTTIME^ and @Crazyhole molested today?
So.. how many children have @KNIGHTTIME^ and @Crazyhole molested today?
If someone has a conservative voting record in the teens and twenties, I don't think I would call them "moderate".
The Republican party in general isnt conversative, that doesnt make them liberals. I also didnt say anything about "conservative" I said centrist Republican, which he is.
Except all 3 are liberal Republicans, not moderates. Cornyn is more of a moderate.
They most certainly are not liberal. You cant just decide that everything you dont like is liberal, that isnt how reality works.
You do it all the time, just like you did a few minutes ago trying to make China out to be supported by liberals but not by conservatives. I dont think I have ever seen you call out a Republican in this thread, because that would destroy the Qanon narrative that only liberals do bad things to kids, which is of course not remotely true. And now, apparently these Republicans are liberals too.
Just curious, who do you define as an actual conservative?
Well it isn't exactly a shocker that communism is a left-wing ideology, so there is a rational thought process in why I think Disney looking the other way is a left leaning position.
Who is a conservative? Mike Lee.
China is propped up by Western capitalism. China isnt really communist. Authoritarian yes, but communist? Not really. But you cant have a real discussion on China without bringing up the fact that it is US and Euro companies who have enabled China, and that was done out of capitalist ideals. You cant separate capitalism from the rise of China as a world power and people who have voted for both parties have certainly benefit from, and looked the other way with things with regards to China.
Lee is a social conservative and a hypocrite just like most of them. He was one who didnt think Garland should get a hearing because it was an election year, but was perfectly ok voting or Barrett a month before an election. He might not be as bad as some others, but he is certainly a partisan hack too. . Someone like Justin Amash I wouldve considered conservative, but actual conservatives in todays Republican party are few and far between.
Last edited:
I never tried to deny that we have propped them up to the position of power they now have. Maybe we should follow their model and gain our dominance over the world once again.
But my point, is that you cant say China is a "left" thing while at the same time acknowledging it was the west in general who helped China become what they are.
Maybe the only point that matters is that we respect natural law and human rights, and not exploit it for our own benefit unless we are willing to be in that same position later.
