ADVERTISEMENT

Nm

Below are the statements that the actual paper made about vaccinations. As you'll see, they didn't actually make a comparative statement between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Furthermore, if you drill down into the tables, the numerical differences weren't that striking. Maybe I'm reading it wrong but the reporting on the report makes it seem like the differences are far more significant than the paper and data actually suggest.

1. "Our analyses censoring participants at time of vaccination and controlling for vaccination as a time-varying covariate show that the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis reported in this study is significant in people who were not vaccinated and is evident regardless of vaccination status."

2. "Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis without COVID-19 vaccination
Because some COVID-19 vaccines might be associated with a very rare risk of myocarditis or pericarditis, and to eliminate any putative contribution of potential vaccine exposure to the outcomes of myocarditis and pericarditis in this study, we conducted two analyses. First, we censored cohort participants at the time of receiving the first dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. Second, we adjusted for vaccination as a time-varying covariate. Both analyses were conducted versus both the contemporary and historical control groups. The results suggested that COVID-19 was associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in both analyses (Supplementary Tables 2124)."
Right. And guess what else this study DIDN'T say:
Remember all of the warnings about how the spike protein damages the heart?


That was like, my point, and stuff, Kemosahbee.
 
Yeah I bitch about loss of freedoms. You're a sheep that will do whatever Joe Brandon says to do.
Are you a female with a vagina?


af67714f4771cff62807a775e230f34c.jpeg
 
^^^Same people that said masks worked for 2 years. Or started by some random bat eating contest.
Oh it was over for you in March 2020?? Could've fooled me...

Then stop talking about it 24/7. Stop posting every fake and stupid tweet you see about it. Stop shitting all over the vaccine. Stop acting like you know what you're talking about. Stop hinting that you may or may not have taken the vaccine.

Nope. You're not going to do any of that. So, as we approach March 2022, COVID is very much alive and kicking for you and you still worry about it, as evidenced by your woke and bitchy behavior.
 
Yeah I bitch about loss of freedoms. You're a sheep that will do whatever Joe Brandon says to do.
Oh it was over for you in March 2020?? Could've fooled me...

Then stop talking about it 24/7. Stop posting every fake and stupid tweet you see about it. Stop shitting all over the vaccine. Stop acting like you know what you're talking about. Stop hinting that you may or may not have taken the vaccine.

Nope. You're not going to do any of that. So, as we approach March 2022, COVID is very much alive and kicking for you and you still worry about it, as evidenced by your woke and bitchy behavior.
 
He's still woke and as concerned as ever with COVID, folks.

Oh it was over for you in March 2020?? Could've fooled me...

Then stop talking about it 24/7. Stop posting every fake and stupid tweet you see about it. Stop shitting all over the vaccine. Stop acting like you know what you're talking about. Stop hinting that you may or may not have taken the vaccine.

Nope. You're not going to do any of that. So, as we approach March 2022, COVID is very much alive and kicking for you and you still worry about it, as evidenced by your woke and bitchy behavior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ucfmikes
The women around here not scared of covid are less beta than you. Admit you're a sheep and you fell for the scam.
STILL GOING!!!!

Oh it was over for you in March 2020?? Could've fooled me...

Then stop talking about it 24/7. Stop posting every fake and stupid tweet you see about it. Stop shitting all over the vaccine. Stop acting like you know what you're talking about. Stop hinting that you may or may not have taken the vaccine.

Nope. You're not going to do any of that. So, as we approach March 2022, COVID is very much alive and kicking for you and you still worry about it, as evidenced by your woke and bitchy behavior.
 


It's funny that they thought changing the definition would actually make things better. Like calling Vietnam a police action instead of a war, lol.
 
Yeah I've been really scared of covid that has almost a zero percent chance of killing me. I was one that went to the beach and stayed in hotels...oh the horror! This while chuds were suing to close the beaches. I made fun of those wearing masks and gloves from the beginning.
@knighttime who’s scared of COVID


mom-please-pick-me-up-im-scared-memes-17979a7c7b37dee9-847d0444eefbb56d.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: KnighttimeJoe
Below are the statements that the actual paper made about vaccinations. As you'll see, they didn't actually make a comparative statement between vaccinated and unvaccinated. Furthermore, if you drill down into the tables, the numerical differences weren't that striking. Maybe I'm reading it wrong but the reporting on the report makes it seem like the differences are far more significant than the paper and data actually suggest.

1. "Our analyses censoring participants at time of vaccination and controlling for vaccination as a time-varying covariate show that the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis reported in this study is significant in people who were not vaccinated and is evident regardless of vaccination status."

2. "Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis without COVID-19 vaccination
Because some COVID-19 vaccines might be associated with a very rare risk of myocarditis or pericarditis, and to eliminate any putative contribution of potential vaccine exposure to the outcomes of myocarditis and pericarditis in this study, we conducted two analyses. First, we censored cohort participants at the time of receiving the first dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. Second, we adjusted for vaccination as a time-varying covariate. Both analyses were conducted versus both the contemporary and historical control groups. The results suggested that COVID-19 was associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in both analyses (Supplementary Tables 2124)."

So let’s get back to who didn’t read the paper. 🙄

@Crazyhole read it. sk8 read it. I read it.


Joe was not only adimant only HE read the paper, but that it showed a beneficiary effect of vaccines. 😂

It’s pretty clear he never read it and made the entire thing up about any perceived benefit. Neither claimed by the author nor in the underlying study itself. But that is how the MSM narrative was spun around this study. A sucker born every minute 💰🤦‍♀️
 
So let’s get back to who didn’t read the paper. 🙄

@Crazyhole read it. sk8 read it. I read it.


Joe was not only adimant only HE read the paper, but that it showed a beneficiary effect of vaccines. 😂

It’s pretty clear he never read it and made the entire thing up about any perceived benefit. Neither claimed by the author nor in the underlying study itself. But that is how the MSM narrative was spun around this study. A sucker born every minute 💰🤦‍♀️
Did you read the paper about how Princess Dianna was actually killed by the Pfizer vaccine? Some mouse avatar named Kjii Jikkicum posted it on Twitter. Open your eyes you sheep.
 
So let’s get back to who didn’t read the paper. 🙄

@Crazyhole read it. sk8 read it. I read it.


Joe was not only adimant only HE read the paper, but that it showed a beneficiary effect of vaccines. 😂

It’s pretty clear he never read it and made the entire thing up about any perceived benefit. Neither claimed by the author nor in the underlying study itself. But that is how the MSM narrative was spun around this study. A sucker born every minute 💰🤦‍♀️


 
So let’s get back to who didn’t read the paper. 🙄

@Crazyhole read it. sk8 read it. I read it.


Joe was not only adimant only HE read the paper, but that it showed a beneficiary effect of vaccines. 😂

It’s pretty clear he never read it and made the entire thing up about any perceived benefit. Neither claimed by the author nor in the underlying study itself. But that is how the MSM narrative was spun around this study. A sucker born every minute 💰🤦‍♀️
smh
 
Last edited:
Yeah I've been really scared of covid that has almost a zero percent chance of killing me. I was one that went to the beach and stayed in hotels...oh the horror! This while chuds were suing to close the beaches. I made fun of those wearing masks and gloves from the beginning.

New virus that escaped a Chinese lab which has killed 5.2M people: "i aInT sKaRd!!!"

Vaccine that has been safely given to more people than any vaccine in human history: "omg I'm scared, get that away from me!"
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ucfmikes
New virus that escaped a Chinese lab which has killed 5.2M people: "i aInT sKaRd!!!"

Vaccine that has been safely given to more people than any vaccine in human history: "omg I'm scared, get that away from me!"
Lemme guess, Knighttime's response:

all 5.2M were:

obese, old people, would have died anyhow, WOKE AF, and cloth mask wearing.

Anything else I am missing?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ucfmikes
Glad you're admitting the lab leak. That was a tin foil hat conspiracy until recently. Why would you be scared if you're under 50 in great physical shape even prior to the vaccine?

Never said those in high risk groups to not to get vaccinated for the record. I'm only against the mandates. Everything else is a personal decision. Unfortunately we have government overreaching.

I suspected the virus escaped a lab in Wuhan for probably over a year at this point. Maybe longer. You are the king at arguing against things that doesn't exist.

And I was asking why you're scared of the vaccine. Every set of available data that looks at the risk profile of getting COVID vs getting the vaccine points to getting the vaccine as the far, far less risky option. So unless you are incapable of doing basic risk assessments, I assume you're just scared of a needle.
 
What if I told you the average covid death age is in the ballpark of the life expectancy? 🤔

And I never said for an old person especially with pre-existing conditions not to get vaccinated. Just FYI my grandmother at 98 beat covid prior to the vaccine being available.
Yeah. We believe you.
 
cartoon-cavemen-vector-id486222812



Well at least they are admitting that there was an increase in deaths.
What if I told you the average covid death age is in the ballpark of the life expectancy? 🤔

And I never said for an old person especially with pre-existing conditions not to get vaccinated. Just FYI my grandmother at 98 beat covid prior to the vaccine being available.
cartoon-cavemen-vector-id486222812
 
Imagine having a public health policy that actually caused more deaths than it spared, and still have people defend it. No matter how you spin it, we had more deaths than expected in 2021. That is a failure of policy by any definition.
 
Imagine having a public health policy that actually caused more deaths than it spared, and still have people defend it. No matter how you spin it, we had more deaths than expected in 2021. That is a failure of policy by any definition.
Imagine being dumb enough to think this, type it out, and then hit the post button.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ucfmikes
Nah, suicidal boy. I was referring to yours. But you already knew that.

Stop the charade. Time for you to grow up.
Boo hoo. Just admit that you think our public health response was a success in your opinion and then we can discuss whether it should have led to more deaths than expected.
 
images
Imagine having a public health policy that actually caused more deaths than it spared, and still have people defend it. No matter how you spin it, we had more deaths than expected in 2021. That is a failure of policy by any definition.

images
 
Boo hoo. Just admit that you think our public health response was a success in your opinion and then we can discuss whether it should have led to more deaths than expected.
Boo hoo?

Our public health response was fine. To antivax conspiracy theory nutjobs like you, it was a disaster. But you’re not well, right n the head, or very intelligent. So here we are…
 
Boo hoo?

Our public health response was fine. To antivax conspiracy theory nutjobs like you, it was a disaster. But you’re not well, right n the head, or very intelligent. So here we are…
Lol. A successful public health policy should lead to fewer deaths and a generally more healthy population, no?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT