"Not so fast" on the booster shots according to the FDA

[Crazyhole]

CDC and FDA warn White House to slow down push for booster shots, add confusion to vaccine push | Blaze Media

The Biden administration declared last month that it was planning to begin offering third-shot boosters for fully vaccinated Americans on Sept. 20. The announcement came a week after the FDA authorized third shots for folks who are immunocompromised.But — as has become habit for federal...

www.theblaze.com

 

[Crazyhole]

The Pfizer vaccine animal trials are performing as expected.

 

[UCFBS]

As the US NIH and even WHO have been warning, the US FDA and even the CDC are now accepting the fact that we have 0 data on the benefits. This is more assumption-hope in the absence of data.

Now the immunocompromised or those with certain conditions should still get them. But injecting everyone with the original SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-1 spike proteins when it is relatively eradicated might not help, and could even hurt. We need more data!

In fact, I'm sure we're watching the Israelis and their push to boost even more, especially versus the Brits who have NOT been so quick. A lot in the US NIH have been pushing for an update, like to at least Alpha or Gamma, if not Delta, spikes BEFORE Boosters hit the general populace.

Health Officials Advise White House to Scale Back Booster Plan for Now (Published 2021)

Federal regulators warned on Thursday they may not have enough data to recommend boosters for anyone except certain recipients of the Pfizer vaccine by late September.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Crazyhole]

There must be something to this side effect if they are doing a study on it. It's possible that the concern about spike proteins collecting in the ovaries may be true. That would really suck for young women that want to become mothers.

 

[UCFBS]

View embedded media

There must be something to this side effect if they are doing a study on it. It's possible that the concern about spike proteins collecting in the ovaries may be true. That would really suck for young women that want to become mothers.

We actually have not done jack for women ...

Other than track miscarriage rates, and largely among medical staff themselves. They are no more than double in the worst case plots, and not any worse than other vaccines. But no other studies were done. Absolutely no, specific trials were conducted in this area at all. It's just been statistical analysis.

This will be one of the first, long-term studies. That's why I said, we only have most immediate and now short-term complications understood, many mitigated, although we're still lacking tests for most. We have virtually no long-term complication understanding, which is now more of the focus. Again, this is one of the first ones.

This is typical of anything. It's not different than anything else. i don't understand why the pro-vaxxers said this wasn't necessary or I was making things up, and that we already knew everything.

 

[Ucfmikes]

This will be one of the first, long-term studies. That's why I said, we only have most immediate and now short-term complications understood, many mitigated, although we're still lacking tests for most. We have virtually no long-term complication understanding, which is now more of the focus. Again, this is one of the first ones.

There isn’t any. Maybe in the one you took, since you’re so clueless about vaccines. You’re anti-Pfizer obsession owns you

Go take your horse paste and stand in an empty stadium with 2 masks! 😂😂😂😂

 

[Crazyhole]

There isn’t any. Maybe in the one you took, since you’re so clueless about vaccines. You’re anti-Pfizer obsession owns you

Go take your horse paste and stand in an empty stadium with 2 masks! 😂😂😂😂

Why is the j&j vaccine more dangerous than the pfizer or Moderna vaxxes?

 

[fried-chicken]

So now we trust the FDA? Struggling to keep up.

 

[fried-chicken]

View embedded media

There must be something to this side effect if they are doing a study on it. It's possible that the concern about spike proteins collecting in the ovaries may be true. That would really suck for young women that want to become mothers.

If they study something there must be something to it.

-local moron

 

[fried-chicken]

View embedded media

There must be something to this side effect if they are doing a study on it. It's possible that the concern about spike proteins collecting in the ovaries may be true. That would really suck for young women that want to become mothers.

Effect of ivermectin on male fertility and its interaction with P-glycoprotein inhibitor (verapamil) in rats | Request PDF

Request PDF | Effect of ivermectin on male fertility and its interaction with P-glycoprotein inhibitor (verapamil) in rats | Administration of permeability-glycoprotein (Pgp) inhibitors can modify the pharmacological properties or induce toxic effects of Pgp substrates.... | Find, read and cite...

www.researchgate.net

 

[Ucfmikes]

Effect of ivermectin on male fertility and its interaction with P-glycoprotein inhibitor (verapamil) in rats | Request PDF

Request PDF | Effect of ivermectin on male fertility and its interaction with P-glycoprotein inhibitor (verapamil) in rats | Administration of permeability-glycoprotein (Pgp) inhibitors can modify the pharmacological properties or induce toxic effects of Pgp substrates.... | Find, read and cite...

www.researchgate.net

This is a very good thing. I don’t want some of these morons reproducing.

 

[Ucfmikes]

Why is the j&j vaccine more dangerous than the pfizer or Moderna vaxxes?

It’s starting at something like 74% effective. I’m not up on the latest against the variants.

 

[Crazyhole]

If they study something there must be something to it.

-local moron

So there is nothing to spurred them to study it? The thought just appeared out of thin air.

 

[Crazyhole]

Data posted on the Israeli Health Ministry’s website indicate that the vaccines administered to people over age 65 in January now offer just 55 percent protection against severe illness.


This in addition to waning efficacy.

That says to get a booster after 5 months. When did they go from 6 to 5?

 

[Ucfmikes]

Data posted on the Israeli Health Ministry’s website indicate that the vaccines administered to people over age 65 in January now offer just 55 percent protection against severe illness.


This in addition to waning efficacy.

Awesome. Hate to have 0% with nothing
Where do I sign up? Are you sterile yet?

 

[knightraveler]

There isn’t any. Maybe in the one you took, since you’re so clueless about vaccines. You’re anti-Pfizer obsession owns you

Go take your horse paste and stand in an empty stadium with 2 masks! 😂😂😂😂

It's simply unbelievable that the same people who distrust vaccines are running to the hardware store to take ivermectin.

 

[Crazyhole]

Israeli experts analyze mRNA COVID vaccines long-term effects

Experts believe there will be no long-term side effects to the mRNA vaccines.

www.jpost.com

Pretty good read.

 

[Ucfmikes]

running to the hardware store to take ivermectin

I think they ran out. It’s mange season for horses and there is a big demand at the local feed store

 

[Ucfmikes]

Israeli experts analyze mRNA COVID vaccines long-term effects

Experts believe there will be no long-term side effects to the mRNA vaccines.

www.jpost.com

Pretty good read.

Wow.. In other groundbreaking news, water is wet and NGEbraska football isn’t going to win the National championship

 

[fried-chicken]

So there is nothing to spurred them to study it? The thought just appeared out of thin air.

Studies show nothing more often than they show something. Science is all about testing everything. The existence of a study means nothing until the results are in. You would know that just because someone is studying something doesn't mean there is a solid connection if you weren't a local Nebraskan hick pretending to be a scientist on the internet.

 

[Crazyhole]

Studies show nothing more often than they show something. Science is all about testing everything. The existence of a study means nothing until the results are in. You would know that just because someone is studying something doesn't mean there is a solid connection if you weren't a local Nebraskan hick pretending to be a scientist on the internet.

What is the first step in the scientific method copernicus?

 

[fried-chicken]

What is the first step in the scientific method copernicus?

According to you it's drawing a conclusion before you have results.

 

[DaShuckster]

Science is all about testing everything.

<excitedly scribbles in notepad>

I learn so much from this board.

 

[Crazyhole]

According to you it's drawing a conclusion before you have results.

I've drawn no conclusion. All I did was acknowledge that an observation was made and there is a hypothesis that the vaccine may be causing this.

You dismissed the entire scientific method out of hand because of confirmation bias.

 

[Crazyhole]

<excitedly scribbles in notepad>

I learn so much from this board.

According to FC, a study is being done on whether the covid vaccine can cause people to grow extra fingers.

 

[fried-chicken]

According to FC, a study is being done on whether the covid vaccine can cause people to grow extra fingers.

How do you not see the glaring confirmation bias in your posts? You dismiss the effectiveness of everything you are told not to like politically even as it's been studied and reviewed and tested with easily accessible and reliable results that prove efficacy. Then you post some initial study with no results as "there must be something to this" because it undermines the things you're told not to like. How can you not see that you are a programmed useful idiot to people who want to engage in a culture war for votes over the topics of masks and toughness and vaccines even as they themselves are vaccinated and they are just trying to appeal to dumb shit hillbilly voters.

Why is the FDA trash when it approves vaccines but you cite it when it says we aren't ready for 3rd shot boosters? You're programmed and your inconsistent views give you away as a little bitch boy for people looking to secure the loony vote at the cost of the health of America.

 

[Crazyhole]

How do you not see the glaring confirmation bias in your posts? You dismiss the effectiveness of everything you are told not to like politically even as it's been studied and reviewed and tested with easily accessible and reliable results that prove efficacy. Then you post some initial study with no results as "there must be something to this" because it undermines the things you're told not to like. How can you not see that you are a programmed useful idiot to people who want to engage in a culture war for votes over the topics of masks and toughness and vaccines even as they themselves are vaccinated and they are just trying to appeal to dumb shit hillbilly voters.

Why is the FDA trash when it approves vaccines but you cite it when it says we aren't ready for 3rd shot boosters? You're programmed and your inconsistent views give you away as a little bitch boy for people looking to secure the loony vote at the cost of the health of America.

Meh. You paint everything in black and white, which makes it impossible for you to have a rational conversation. To make matters worse, you assign politics to things that have no connection whatsoever. The NIH doing a study somehow has something to do with my political ideology I guess. So be it if that's your take, but its stupid.

 

[Crazyhole]

MSN

www.msn.com

The WHO doesn't think healthy people like @Ucfmikes should get a booster until Pablo in El Salvador gets his first shot.

 

[Ucfmikes]

The WHO doesn't think healthy people like @Ucfmikes should get a booster until Pablo in El Salvador gets his first shot.

“DON’T GET FOOLED AGAIN”

 

[fabknight]

And Biden will use our tax money to get them vaccinated. Lol

Maybe they can finish the wall in return.

 

[Crazyhole]

“DON’T GET FOOLED AGAIN”

^^^^ wants to hoard all of the shots for himself. Selfish.