ADVERTISEMENT

Republicans in Michigan have Blocked Certification in a County Biden needs to Win.

Huh? Hillary conceded the day after the election and the transition process began almost immediately.
Except for that whole spying thing. Plus, last time I checked the Trump administration doesn't seem to have a problem with Bidens team contacting foreign countries. Maybe they do and we just don't know about it yet, but even if they do its what they had to deal with.
 
Except for that whole spying thing. Plus, last time I checked the Trump administration doesn't seem to have a problem with Bidens team contacting foreign countries. Maybe they do and we just don't know about it yet, but even if they do its what they had to deal with.

Aside from moving the goal post because you have no actual of evidence of voter fraud, you very well know that what you are talking about was a lot more complicated than "spying" on Trump. It also has nothing to do with that fact that Trump is refusing a peaceful transfer of power, and Republicans seem to be ok with it, because they don't believe in the basic foundation of America.
 
Aside from moving the goal post because you have no actual of evidence of voter fraud, you very well know that what you are talking about was a lot more complicated than "spying" on Trump. It also has nothing to do with that fact that Trump is refusing a peaceful transfer of power, and Republicans seem to be ok with it, because they don't believe in the basic foundation of America.
That isn't moving the goalposts. Simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left demanding a peaceful transfer of power when less than 4 years ago they were guilty of undermining the new administration.
 
That isn't moving the goalposts. Simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left demanding a peaceful transfer of power when less than 4 years ago they were guilty of undermining the new administration.

It is absolutely moving the goal posts. You start with voter fraud and move to Obama spying on Trump. ANd again, you are doing it because you know the voter fraud thing is BS. Obama met with Trump immediately and the transition started, that is a fact. It is also a fact that Trump is not doing that with Biden.
 
It is absolutely moving the goal posts. You start with voter fraud and move to Obama spying on Trump. ANd again, you are doing it because you know the voter fraud thing is BS.
You changed the subject to transfer of power. Self-awareness is a helpful tool to use when accusing someone of something.
 
You changed the subject to transfer of power. Self-awareness is a helpful tool to use when accusing someone of something.

Because it is directly related to Trump's accusation of voter fraud, this isn't hard to keep up with. Trump isn't allowing the transition, because of voter fraud conspiracies. See the connection?

And BTW, the inspector general report found no indication that Obama spied on Trump. I know that isn't as fun as your conspiracy theories, but that is what the report found. But that is all I am going to say about that, because you are trying to derail the thread from your nut job voter fraud conspiracies.
 
Last edited:
Because it is directly related to Trump's accusation of voter fraud, this isn't hard to keep up with. Trump isn't allowing the transition, because of voter fraud conspiracies. See the connection?

And BTW, the inspector general report found no indication that Obama spied on Trump. I don't that isn't as fun as your conspiracy theories, but that is what the report found. But that is all I am going to say about that, because you are trying to derail the thread from your nut job voter fraud conspiracies.
Bye
 
Not sure I agree with security briefings, but yes Biden should be privy to everything covid related.

Why not? He's actually getting less info now than he was when he was the Dem nominee, and his VP has access to information he doesn't.

Interesting note in the third tweet in this thread. Technically, it would be illegal for Harris to share classified intel with Biden.

 
Who knows...democrats were running around saying not my president and resist all the time. Resist what? Who knows...democrats usually resist work. ;)
So keep crying then and maybe in 4 years your opinion can matter again but for now you're on Mr Biden's wild ride and he coming to sniff your children and there's nothing you can do to stop him.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: renzmeister
I understand defending nut job conspiracies can be exhausting, so have a good one.
I appreciate your frustration, Cubs79.

Our board's Usual Suspects point to 2016 and say things like, "Well, YOU LIBS didn't acknowledge Trump's win either." Naturally, you correctly point that Hillary conceded the day after the election and the following day President Obama invited Trump to the White House and began the formal transition process. (FYI, Trump lost by more in 2020 than he beat Hillary by in 2016.)

But Chud News can always feed our gang enough red meat bullshit that they somehow feel justified turning their back on the democracy that our country is built upon because....(drumroll)...."the other side does un-democratic stuff too!!!"
 
Would it be ok if Trump doesn't concede but shares Intel with Biden? If so, why not the libertarian and green party candidates? Where do you draw the line with who should be briefed?
I will say this We own you... Accept what we say..no more being nice..You don't like it ...Tough wait 4 years you spineless jellyfish..😂😂🤣🤣
 
Is concession an official act?

Decent TED Talk I listened to recently that argued our entire history of maintaining peaceful transitions of power comes down to tradition. And the key tradition is the loser conceding. Pretty compelling argument, particular when you're talking about a losing incumbent.

Lots of "official acts" are functionally conditioned on POTUS admitting he lost and signaling his acceptance of said loss.
 
Georgia--CONFIRMED. Tick tock, chuds. The loser just lost again.

Pretty sure Georgia had a legal requirement to confirm it’s results today. This should’ve been expected.
 
Pretty sure Georgia had a legal requirement to confirm it’s results today. This should’ve been expected.

Ah, yeah, we were told all about massive fraud in this state and dead people voting and all kinds of other nefarious shit. So, we should have expected that the count was simply to be done or that the people who made these baseless allegations (cough Donald, cough cough) were full of caca y mas caca?
 
Ah, yeah, we were told all about massive fraud in this state and dead people voting and all kinds of other nefarious shit. So, we should have expected that the count was simply to be done or that the people who made these baseless allegations (cough Donald, cough cough) were full of caca y mas caca?
I’m just saying that it’s not a surprise that Georgia certified it’s results today nor is it symbolic of any major evolution to be trumpeted from the walls. The big deadline is the EC deadline. The courts can still take action until then.
 
I’m just saying that it’s not a surprise that Georgia certified it’s results today nor is it symbolic of any major evolution to be trumpeted from the walls. The big deadline is the EC deadline. The courts can still take action until then.

Take action for what? There is absolutely nothing that is going to change the results.
 
Take action for what? There is absolutely nothing that is going to change the results.
So let’s say there is evidence of illegal ballot harvesting on a wide scale, or ballot counterfeiting (as a hypothetical, not saying this election). If the state certifies the results before the investigation is complete, then nothing can change the election results? I don’t think that’s true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crazyhole
So let’s say there is evidence of illegal ballot harvesting on a wide scale, or ballot counterfeiting (as a hypothetical, not saying this election). If the state certifies the results before the investigation is complete, then nothing can change the election results? I don’t think that’s true.
State legislatures can do whatever they want to right up to the day of appointing electors. They can even refuse to appoint electors.
 
So let’s say there is evidence of illegal ballot harvesting on a wide scale, or ballot counterfeiting (as a hypothetical, not saying this election). If the state certifies the results before the investigation is complete, then nothing can change the election results? I don’t think that’s true.

I am not speaking in hypothetical terms and am, instead, referring to this election. We can play the what if game all day but it has nothing to do with the price of rice for Biden's win over Donald on election day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hemightbejeremy
State legislatures can do whatever they want to right up to the day of appointing electors. They can even refuse to appoint electors.
The burden of proof to convince them to do something as drastic as that will go above and beyond Giuliani and Powell huffing and puffing at a press conference. They will need to actually produce tangible evidence that these things exist in numbers to influence tens of thousands of votes. Or I guess in the case of Michigan, 155k. If they had evidence of this, in essence the greatest heist in world history, it would exist somewhere outside of Sidney Powell’s skull.
 
Last night Senator Mitt Romney tweeted:
“Having failed to make even a plausible case of widespread fraud or conspiracy before any court of law, the President has now resorted to overt pressure on state and local officials to subvert the will of the people and overturn the election. It is difficult to imagine a worse, more undemocratic action by a sitting American President.”

Can we FINALLY end this charade, guys?
 
Ah, yeah, we were told all about massive fraud in this state and dead people voting and all kinds of other nefarious shit. So, we should have expected that the count was simply to be done or that the people who made these baseless allegations (cough Donald, cough cough) were full of caca y mas caca?
What about the dominion vote switching orchestrated by the ghost of Hugo Chavez in coordination with Antifa and George Soros? Did the hand count uncover any of that?
 
The burden of proof to convince them to do something as drastic as that will go above and beyond Giuliani and Powell huffing and puffing at a press conference. They will need to actually produce tangible evidence that these things exist in numbers to influence tens of thousands of votes. Or I guess in the case of Michigan, 155k. If they had evidence of this, in essence the greatest heist in world history, it would exist somewhere outside of Sidney Powell’s skull.
We don't know what she has, if anything. From a legal standpoint and knowing their strategy, it makes sense that she isn't going to share it until the last minute. They want chaos and to force state legislatures and congress to have to deal with it.
 
We don't know what she has, if anything. From a legal standpoint and knowing their strategy, it makes sense that she isn't going to share it until the last minute. They want chaos and to force state legislatures and congress to have to deal with it.
Actually there is a legal process called discovery where...get this...they are required to share the evidence they have with the defense (in this case the jurisdiction they are suing). So no she cannot just keep evidence in her head and then “spring it” in court as a “strategy”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaShuckster
Actually there is a legal process called discovery where...get this...they are required to share the evidence they have with the defense (in this case the jurisdiction they are suing). So no she cannot just keep evidence in her head and then “spring it” in court as a “strategy”.
Have they filed for discovery yet?
 
I’m not sure what you mean. When a suit is filed the discovery process begins. Most of these 30 some odd suits have been thrown out before the evidentiary phase though.
You have to make discovery requests. If you don't ask for it, the other side doesn't have to provide it. The strategy is to wait until the last minute, dump their findings all at once in court, and try to convince the justices to put a stay on certifying the electors pending the outcome of the case.
 
You have to make discovery requests. If you don't ask for it, the other side doesn't have to provide it. The strategy is to wait until the last minute, dump their findings all at once in court, and try to convince the justices to put a stay on certifying the electors pending the outcome of the case.
If that the “strategy” then I think you can judge for yourself how credible the “evidence” is.
 
I'm pretty sure Sydney Powell is a better lawyer than either of us, so I wouldn't begin to speculate on what she has.
Insomuch that she is in fact a lawyer your assertion can only be true. However she lives on the QAnon fringes and is no longer a respected attorney. She doesn’t actively practice law. She is doing this to set up her next book and media tours.
 
Insomuch that she is in fact a lawyer your assertion can only be true. However she lives on the QAnon fringes and is no longer a respected attorney. She doesn’t actively practice law. She is doing this to set up her next book and media tours.
None of that affects the credibility of her evidence. Every lawyer, regardless of how wacky they are, is held to the standard of truth and justice when it comes to facing a judge.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT