Yeah. After all they are still trying to get the evidence for who shot JFK (Ted Cruz’s dad), alien coverups, 9/11 inside job, Bigfoot, and the Loch Ness monster. Some of this stuff can take years to gather.
Your confirmation bias is showing. Can you not wait for a couple of weeks before claiming its just a hoax?
No because I watched the press conference. Venezuela, Cuba, China, Hugo Chavez, Antifa, BLM, George Soros, dominion software, Smartmatic, aren’t all conspiring to take an action to “switch votes” in a computer system. Mainly because the elections have been recanvased and some manually recounted without a shred of evidence that anything like this occurred. The people who believe this stuff don’t understand how elections work and how each county is it’s own distinct entity for election purposes. If there were evidence out there we would have some glimpse of it based on post election activities that have occurred nationwide. It wouldn’t exist solely on QAnon forums and in the mind of a single QAnon sympathizer who happens to be a member of the bar.
Put a stay on the election? Well that would be unconstitutional wouldn't it. Not that you actually give a shit about the constitution.
You cannot put a stay on Election..Electors nust be chosen by a certain day.. The supreme court didn't allow a recount in Florida during Bush Election because the recount would have taken them past date Electors met...These court hangups cannot exceed that...Also some states like Michigan just awards electoral votes to who has highest popular...
This post belongs in the 'How stupid are Trump's lawyers?' thread.
All that being the case, Gore didn't concede until December 13th and pursued legal action pretty much until then. Since it's only November 20th now, we have a bit of time before we even get to that bar.
Facepalm. Yes, the court can put a stay on an election. It kicks the issue back to the legislature to deal with how to apportion their EC votes or not send them at all. They are not required to send electors at all.
The results of the 2000 election were not evident before that time. One state decided the election and that state had a 300 vote margin. Easily within the range of reasonably being reversed after a recount (see 2008 Minnesota senate election). We are talking about the need to flip 3-4 states that all have margins in excess of 10k votes. If you think the situations are comparable you aren’t having an honest discussion.
I have never in my Life have seen so many lies in a Press conference. It's like it was written by many on this board.
So you don't have an issue with the possibility of voter fraud because other issues are more important?
I'm not wanting people to have an issue with anything. I just don't want them to dismiss what actually might be a problem out of hand because it meets their confirmation bias. There is nothing wrong with considering the "what if" until there is proof that the "what if" doesn't exist. If nothing comes from this, great. I'm cool with that. If something does come from this, will you guys be able to overcome what you had already decided to be true in spite of evidence to the contrary?
You can’t prove the non existence of something. You can make claims founded in credible evidence. What has happened here is claims were made (prior to the election even and going back years and years) not founded in credible evidence. Now after the fact people are told to let it play out to see if evidence turns up that supports the claims. That’s not how things really work. Until there is credible evidence shown to support a claim, it is correct to dismiss the claim.
Ok just give me 5 minutes. Shall I do it in-store bathroom or my home? Whatever floats your boat.
What transition efforts does Biden need to have? He already knows where the White House basement is, i would think.
No one is talking about qualifications in this thread. This is the coup thread.
