Geez. Like we are going to find out anything new and it's putting him in a weird position. Since it's public, he won't be able to comment on anything that was redacted. If he brings something important to light that wasn't in the report then he could be charged with a crime. If any details change on any level he can be accused of perjury.
I think Mueller is strongly tempted to go off and give his opinions. Also, this opens him up to questions about the FISA warrants. I would love to see someone lay a perjury trap for him just for the irony of it.
i hope the reps in those committees actually ask hard questions. i hope they grill him.
i know this is omg anecdotal evidence, but ive talked to many friends and family over the past few months. they all vary in political views. they all pretty much want to move on. only the tds people want to move forward with impeachment.
It wouldn't help the Dems, I know that. They are already going to have to answer questions on why nothing is getting done so if they spend months of their time trying to impeach in an obviously futile attempt it will be a bad look.
if there was something in it, the proceedings wouldve started by now.
you do realize the report is available to everyone right? its been months since the release. please point me to the page and line number.IF there was something in it?!?!?!?!!?!
They were summarized for you and your "See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" buddies back when the full report was finally released.
But that didn't mean posters like you or 85 would pay any attention to it's findings.
thats alot of stuff that isnt against the law. obstructing laws that werent broken. man thats hard hitting stuff. i mean these are all clear as day collusion with russian gov officials to rig our 2016 election. why hasnt congress moved to impeach him yet?But that didn't mean posters like you or 85 would pay any attention to it's findings.
The Mueller Report carefully outlined at least ten instances of potential obstruction of justice. Since you and 85 apparently don't remember the discussion of them (since, obviously, they were 'fake' news stories), here's a brief summary of the areas where Mueller laid out documentation of potential obstruction of justice:
Yeah, there was literally nothing there, right guys?
- Trump asking FBI Director Comey to let Michael Flynn go.
- Trump's reaction to the Russian investigation (McGahn told to stop AG Sessions recusing himself, reaction when he did, Trump telling Sessions to 'unrecuse' himself.)
- The firing of FBI Director James Comey. Trump telling Russians that he faced "great pressure" because of Russia and that he'd "taken it off" by firing Comey.
- The President's response to the naming of Mueller as Special Council. (Trump instructed McGahn to call Acting AG and have him removed. He did not.)
- Presidential efforts to curtail the Russian Investigation. (Among many things, Trump instructing an aide to push Sessions into limiting the investigation to future election interference. Sessions refused.)
- Attempts to prevent the public from seeing the evidence. (Worked to limit the media's access to Don Jr's emails and Trump's involvement in writing Don Jr.'s initial *False* statement regarding the reason behind his Russian meeting.)
- Trump's efforts to get AG Sessions to 'unrecuse' himself despite repeated efforts.
- Trump telling McGahn to deny he ever wanted the Special Council removed.
- Trump's team's interactions with Flynn and Manafort (e.g. Trump commending Manafort for "not flipping."
- The President's changing stance regarding Michael Cohen.
This is the continued and compounding reason that you and the rest of your left wing extremists buddies like @NinjaKnight won’t have your candidate win in 2020
Red hat
But that didn't mean posters like you or 85 would pay any attention to it's findings.
The Mueller Report carefully outlined at least ten instances of potential obstruction of justice. Since you and 85 apparently don't remember the discussion of them (since, obviously, they were 'fake' news stories), here's a brief summary of the areas where Mueller laid out documentation of potential obstruction of justice:
Yeah, there was literally nothing there, right guys?
- Trump asking FBI Director Comey to let Michael Flynn go.
- Trump's reaction to the Russian investigation (McGahn told to stop AG Sessions recusing himself, reaction when he did, Trump telling Sessions to 'unrecuse' himself.)
- The firing of FBI Director James Comey. Trump telling Russians that he faced "great pressure" because of Russia and that he'd "taken it off" by firing Comey.
- The President's response to the naming of Mueller as Special Council. (Trump instructed McGahn to call Acting AG and have him removed. He did not.)
- Presidential efforts to curtail the Russian Investigation. (Among many things, Trump instructing an aide to push Sessions into limiting the investigation to future election interference. Sessions refused.)
- Attempts to prevent the public from seeing the evidence. (Worked to limit the media's access to Don Jr's emails and Trump's involvement in writing Don Jr.'s initial *False* statement regarding the reason behind his Russian meeting.)
- Trump's efforts to get AG Sessions to 'unrecuse' himself despite repeated efforts.
- Trump telling McGahn to deny he ever wanted the Special Council removed.
- Trump's team's interactions with Flynn and Manafort (e.g. Trump commending Manafort for "not flipping."
- The President's changing stance regarding Michael Cohen.
No collusionI made the erroneous assumption that you people are actually interested in a real discussion of the evidence Mueller collected. I should have known better.
The mere notion that there's "nothing to see here" and that Trump "could fire whomever he wants" is ridiculous when:
1) he tells Comey to back off Flynn and then,
2) when he doesn't, fires him, and then,
3) tells the Russians he took care of his Russian problem.
Yessiree, that doesn't look suspicious at all.
I made the erroneous assumption that you people are actually interested in a real discussion of the evidence Mueller collected. I should have known better.
The mere notion that there's "nothing to see here" and that Trump "could fire whomever he wants" is ridiculous when:
1) he tells Comey to back off Flynn and then,
2) when he doesn't, fires him, and then,
3) tells the Russians he took care of his Russian problem.
Yessiree, that doesn't look suspicious at all.
The truth is no collusion professor. That’s all we care about
It’s not a hard concept. We don’t imprison people in this country for thoughts. He can tell someone he wants to obstruct all day long but if he never actually does it then there is no crime.
Telling someone he wants to obstruct that never actually did it. All for a crime that never existed
Like Trump, beelit47 apparently can't read.
But that didn't mean posters like you or 85 would pay any attention to it's findings.
The Mueller Report carefully outlined at least ten instances of potential obstruction of justice. Since you and 85 apparently don't remember the discussion of them (since, obviously, they were 'fake' news stories), here's a brief summary of the areas where Mueller laid out documentation of potential obstruction of justice:
Yeah, there was literally nothing there, right guys?
- Trump asking FBI Director Comey to let Michael Flynn go.
- Trump's reaction to the Russian investigation (McGahn told to stop AG Sessions recusing himself, reaction when he did, Trump telling Sessions to 'unrecuse' himself.)
- The firing of FBI Director James Comey. Trump telling Russians that he faced "great pressure" because of Russia and that he'd "taken it off" by firing Comey.
- The President's response to the naming of Mueller as Special Council. (Trump instructed McGahn to call Acting AG and have him removed. He did not.)
- Presidential efforts to curtail the Russian Investigation. (Among many things, Trump instructing an aide to push Sessions into limiting the investigation to future election interference. Sessions refused.)
- Attempts to prevent the public from seeing the evidence. (Worked to limit the media's access to Don Jr's emails and Trump's involvement in writing Don Jr.'s initial *False* statement regarding the reason behind his Russian meeting.)
- Trump's efforts to get AG Sessions to 'unrecuse' himself despite repeated efforts.
- Trump telling McGahn to deny he ever wanted the Special Council removed.
- Trump's team's interactions with Flynn and Manafort (e.g. Trump commending Manafort for "not flipping."
- The President's changing stance regarding Michael Cohen.
