A half million people in the US are diagnosed with myocarditis each year. Before the existence of the Covid vaccine. Much like autism, the presence of a condition alone in a vaccinated individual is not evidence that the vaccine caused the condition. This non-link is clear when someone has injuries from a car accident for instance. It’s less clear to some folks when it is a relatively rare heart condition instead.
Glad you are coming around. The vaccine doesn’t prevent blood clots. Which kill someone in the US every 6 minutes. Thousands of young people die of sudden cardiac arrest every year. Again the vaccine isn’t going to prevent this.
I don’t understand what you are posting. They requested more info from someone who submitted a report? And you think 50k are dying caused by the vaccine? I think the horse paste is messing with your brain dude. Are you snorting it?
No concerns whatsoever about experimental technology coming from one company that has never brought a safe product to market and one company that has been subject to dozens of wrongful death lawsuits?
No. It’s not an experimental technology. It’s been around for a decade and been through human clinical trials for safety prior to Covid.
Approved? None. But that’s only because the virus strains they were developed for (pandemic potential influenza strains) didn’t become full fledged pandemics and thus they weren’t necessary. But they still underwent human clinical trials.
Well I suppose we will just have to agree to disagree. I think it's pretty sketchy to use a technology that has never been used and have 200 million people receive the product of it. To me, it seems like a road that might not be worth the risk but I'll probably end up being wrong.
It has been used. In clinical trials dating back to at least 2015. And for this particular vaccine in massive clinical trials with hundreds of thousands of people taking place since early last year.
mRNA vaccines have been used in clinical trials dating back to 2015 for H10N8 and H7N9 influenza strains. This was in preparation for a potential pandemic. mRNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 began trials in mid March 2020.
I think you’re wasting your time. @Boston.Knight is a good dude, but he’s trolling big time. I need to see some concrete evidence about his theories and not what’s basically hearsay
Without writing a 10 paragraph @UCFBS dissertation, you have to remember that this is a vaccine and not a medication. It’s not like it’s effecting the DNA at the cellular level and is not carcinogenic.
If not 'experimental,' then why hasn't a single mRNA type vaccine received US FDA approval to date? Why didn't the influenza mRNA make it to market? Why not any others either?!
We really are ignorant of not just these SARS variants, but coronaviruses. 5 years from now there will be a reckoning, and likely a new age of skeptics.
Did you actually read the results?!?!?!
No, its a combination of generics with vascular fitness. That's what HCoV-OC43 was 100+ years ago.
I don't know if the spikes are bio active. I hope one jab isn't going to matter much. 
It is more likely that this virus is a result of gain of function testing than any other origin.Another "no evidence" conclusion.
I think spike shedding is nonsense - at least intuitively it does not pass the sniff test. Somebody breathing on you is causing menstrual issues? Sorry, I need a bit more to believe that.
On the other hand, if you want to hear a different opinion on cov2 bioweapon, follow this Walter guy. He is some sort of scientist that provides a lot of believable scientific data on bioweapon angle.
I’m not a Berenson fan but, since you linked the Atlantic, I decided to read it and then dig into the links. The author of this article has misrepresented some of Berenson’s posts badly to try to smear him. I think Berenson provides enough material to address honestly without going to misrepresentation.I know snowflake Boston has me on ignore but whatevs:
The Pandemic’s Wrongest Man
In a crowded field of wrongness, one person stands out: Alex Berenson.www.theatlantic.com
The point is that he's no different than the other talking heads out there (wrong more than they are right) and that in today's world of folks picking the narrative that they want and running with it, he runs parallel to the best of them.
Maybe no different. He does seem to look for sources to support his theories which I think makes him somewhat different. But as for how accurate he is as he is twitter-streaming his consciousness, I'm sure he hits and misses.
Previous influenza variants for which mRNA vaccines were developed did not turn into pandemics. So there was no need to market a vaccine to prevent an illness that isn’t circulating in the population. Why have’t the Covid mRNAs been approved via the normal process rather than EUA? Simply because of time since conclusion of the human clinical trial. Pfizer is currently submitting application for full FDA approval and that will likely come very soon.
If this were true he would be the first person to tweet about it. Especially after he left office. Oh wait...
