Show me some evidence, phone calls, witnesses
Biden hasn't been investigated. Clinton has not been investigated either. We need an actual investigation. But Democrats like yourself are asking for evidence prior to it.
But Hillary had so many 'conflicts-of-interest,' even the Obama administration repeatedly took issue with her, and several of those memos became public! But
no investigations ... yet.
Congressional hearings are not investigations. That's why I got tired of the Republicans having a 'show.' And one of the reason why Republicans had a 'show' is because by opening those 'floodgates,' they too would get reamed. But now that it's happened to Trump, we're starting to see more and more Republicans ready to 'go after' at least Biden, if not Clinton, with an 'independent counsel,' once this whole non-sense is over.
SIDE NOTE: Remember, this would not be the first time for Hillary. Or did you not read various reports during the Clinton administration? Both Starr and before Starr? E.g., you do understand things from the get-go like 'Travelgate,' correct? Hillary thought DC was Little Rock, and she could fire permanent staffers and give her friends contracts and jobs.
Trump did say that he was going to "look into Hillary's situation" and "lock her up". What happened to that?
The DoJ gave Hillary a
'Get Out of Jail Free Card' by severely limiting the FBI's ability to seize equipment and otherwise contain the evaluate the damaged caused by her classified spillage and other disclosures. Trump and his DoJ's
'hands are tied' on that.
However ...
over 30 people (up from 11 earlier this year)
have now been identified for discipline and possible
prosecution in their role in handling Clinton's e-mail services -- including, but not limited to --
disabling the Trend Micro Security software and
proliferating malware and other, unauthorized use and access via Clinton's servers. Yes, people are being prosecuted for it now. Yes,
her servers were compromised. Yes, there is
public information on that. And yes, the US State Department was compromised via her servers!
They admitted that last year in Congressional hearings on the matter. Trend Micro also confirmed it independently, upon subpoena. This is what the
public InfoSec community already knew, but the FBI could not investigate, per DoJ agreement with Clinton.
Again, the problem is that
none of that evidence was allowed as part of the Clinton agreement with the DoJ. But it's
not only public record of the US State Department now, but explains what the
public InfoSec community (blackhole lists, security watchdogs of SMTP servers, etc...)
already knew and disclosed, but could not be used against Clinton, per the agreement. Trend Micro's services disclosure further confirmed this.
In other words, when her mail servers were 'attacking' State servers, they were blocking her access and e-mails. She forced them to disable the entire security infrastructure, for 6 months. And that was just 1 incident. It's a total joke at this point. That's why when FireEye hired her to speak at a conference, there were mass protests among not just the public InfoSec community, but even the government IA/CyberSecurity community.