Let me explain my point in excruciating detail because I guess you can't understand third grade logic or apply third grade logic in context of the on going discussion.
Flat earth conspiracies are hilariously fun. But they immediately require you to take a leap of faith that all stitched satellite imagery and full-earth photos taken from further out are doctored and fake. Their theory has no basis to explain why their proposed earth model doesn't appear that way in photos. Thus a huge leap of faith is required just to get past the most basic evidence - a photo. A reasonable person takes the full earth photos at face value. They may listen to your arguments of conspiracy theories and such, but it's going to take a lot of evidence to overcome Occam's Razor.
In other words, the scientifically uninformed but reasonable lay person will place a high level of confidence in NASA supplied imagery of a "round" earth. That's simple and easy to digest evidence contrary to a flat earth. It requires exactly zero knowledge of 18th century classical physics to arrive at this conclusion.
If a mom on FB is nervous about vaccinating her baby thanks to some anti-vax FB group, there's no "round earth photo" equivalent to counter those arguments.
So yes - my point was simple enough a third grader could understand it - though it doesn't appear you did.
So do you believe that the earth is round solely because of the pictures you've seen? The thought never crossed my mind whether to believe them, but the main reason I dismiss the flat earthers is because I was on a cruise ship and could literally see the curvature of the earth. Personal experience should trump what we are told or shown. we arent that far from people using technology to create photos that are completely fabricated so I could see someone creating a picture that would bring all kinds of things into question, the shape of the earth included.