Send Chinander to Lincoln he’s awful:
- Thread starter SADUCFKNIGHT17
- Start date
We are not going to go undefeated if our D keeps playing like this.
the only good news is that the offense is good enough to win shootouts but Chins stock not as high as it was all last season
I haven't been impressed by D since week 4. I never wanted him as our head coach like clowns mentioned if Frost left. We need an offensive coach.
Defense sucked because they are bored with crappy teams
Uconn basically scored 17
SMU basically scored 17
What's wrong with that?
Uconn basically scored 17
SMU basically scored 17
What's wrong with that?
Don’t forget that because UCF is the top team in the conference that we get everyone best shot. We see a different level of intensity than other AAC teams.
Statistically, our defense gives up a lot of yards. But given the amount of points our opponents score, it's been more of a bend but don't break kind of defense. We give up a ton of yards, but we're making stops and turnovers when it matters and it shows on the scoreboard.
So they weren't trying hard when they played P5 Missouri? Lost to them 52-12.
It's funny to watch our fanbase turn on the EC/DC when we let them get 400 yards and 17 + a last second 7.
Maybe it's all just part of the plan by Frost to keep a P5 from snatching Chinander?
He was never as good as people were making him out to be and he’s not as bad as everyone is making out to be now.
Are you guys High? We are 9-0 and won by 10+ every game....gesh
overall, our defense is playing well and is coached well. I think what is hurting us is the non-existent pass rush. This is forcing our LB's to play closer to the line which in turn puts a lot of pressure on the corners and safeties. Thank God for Jasinki because he has been the saving grace on defense. IMO, Pittman and Hill are way over-rated. They do decent in run defense but suck at pass rush!
Go check the SMU winning margin and burn an ottoman for your lack of insight.
Chinander is fine. The defense is probably a little tired and bored. Tackling could be better
Problem is when you score so many points and are playing poor competition, the intensity isn't the same
Let's see how they do against Temple and USF
Problem is when you score so many points and are playing poor competition, the intensity isn't the same
Let's see how they do against Temple and USF
Last edited:
And thats what these guys are supposed to do....they aren't pass rushers. That failure is on the OLBs, and the secondary guys rushing on full blitz packages.
Our big pass rush failure is we don't use middle blitz packages.
In addition to better tackling we need to do a better job getting off the field on third down. That said after looking at the stats from the last few games, we need to allow less conversions period. UConn actually had more first downs than we did, other recent teams very close to us.
Last edited:
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
*The defenders are getting to the right places (which comes from proper coaching), Coach can't make the tackles for them.
I think one opponent got their scoring average against UCF, Cincinnati. UCF plays uptempo which means the defense is exposed to more drives and allows more yards. Advanced metrics like defensive drive success rate has UCF at top 10 in the country. How do you think UCF has such a large average margin of victory (tops in the nation)?
Because we are scoring 48 a game. If we were doing this last year it would have been the same.
Yeah, SMU's offense will put up 24 on any team barring the Alabamas and Ohio States of the world.
Agree with this....I don't believe this is a coaching letdown as much as a player intensity letdown knowing the offense can now consistently pick them up. This was the model at Oregon.....if you like shootouts that's fine....I'd rather have a hardcore "D". I would give Hill a break he's being doubled on nearly every snap. He's clearly our best "D" lineman. We need to get a pass rush ASAP or else there will be trouble on the horizon. I hope we add plenty of "D" line and linebacker depth in the next 2 recruiting classes.
Pace of play also contributes to being the top scoring team in the country. Defensive drive success rate shows that UCF is a top 10 defense. Anyway I'm going to enjoy the 9-0 start and wins by 4 touchdowns instead of complaining that we didn't win by 5.
Not at the time i didnt, but youre right. Still 17 points vs an offense who will have a first round WR, the white kid who will 100% go in the draft soon and a QB who is currently #2 in conference for passing yards, ill take that 99% of the time.
Some of our board posters are legit retards. Complaining about 9-0 is ridiculous
You are missing the point. This thread is not to complain and has nothing to do with going 9-0. It has everything to do with our ability to go 13-0. If our D coordinator addresses some weaknesses that if corrected will help us go undefeated, it will result in our highest ranking and our best season ever.
It is all about this:
I think some are missing the point ...
The EC/DC shut down Memphis ... we won 40-7 (before that last second TD). Memphis' high powered offense.
Seriously, everyone is on the EC/DC because he's not always blowing away the spread. Ummm ... we're winning guys, and with a D that shuts down people when required.
Also keep in mind ... the "spreads" weren't as big earlier in the year, as they are now.
Last edited:
He’ll probably be Frosts DC next year in Lincoln, so you’re likely to get your wish. Not completely sold on him either, but if Frost trusts him, I can live with it.
Similar threads
