Should UCF accept a classic 2:1 that Scott Stricklin claims to now support (2 in the Swamp and 1 in the Bounce House)?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish they’d just split the difference and play the 3rd game at camping world stadium. Don’t need to be a genius here...
In that context, what if 2 G5!schools go undefeated? Only we get the NY6 Bowl because of our brand? I don’t think that’s fair either.I don't think we should base our decisions on the playoff picture. There are 125 teams every year that do not make it to the playoffs. Many of them are considered highly successful programs even though they do not make the playoffs. Their success is about consistently being in the upper echelon of their conference, playing and defeating tough out of conference foes and the exposure that comes with such accomplishments and quality bowl games.
I believe that the next steps for us as a program should be to focus on consistently making it to and winning 1.) the conference championship, (This may hurt to say but, news flash, we did not make it to the CCG last year) and 2.) New Year's six games as the best G-5. Once we have CONSISTENTLY locked down these achievements, just like Clemson, Alabama and Ohio State have locked down being in the top four annually, only them should we begin to talk about the CFP as the next step for the program.
I know that the nation continues to talk about us in relationship to the CFP. This is a red herring. We should not let success of our program be defined in relationship to something that we cannot control. With only four CFP openings, our invitation to that will always depend on chaos and other things which we cannot control. We can however more reasonably control getting to our CCG and the New Year's six. In a logical progression of priorities, these accomplishments should be the next and immediate priorities guiding our program decisions.
I have been a Fan since the day I got on campus in 1996. I honestly just care about winning the conference and making a major bowl, all things not possible when I was a Freshman. I have been on many road games but the conference championships, the Epic USF games are what I remember. We don’t need 2-1s to be relevant or to have fun as fans.Generally you want to strike while the iron is hot.
Every program will face down years, and when you have less money the turnaround can take longer. Every major program that has accomplished more, has more money, better facilities, bigger fan base, more intangible advantages has fallen at some point. The idea that UCF won't face similar circumstances is being purposely ignorant.
If UCF played FSU the next three years in a 2-1 and swept them. That would have lasting impact in the state of Florida and recruiting.
Even a few 10-3 seasons basically puts them in mid major status, no big bowls. And as mentioned previously bowl games will become more exhibition with players sitting out, outside of the playoffs.
Lastly as a fan, 20 years from now. Are you going to care about playing Boise State in 1 for 1, or the time you played on the road against a major program. Calculated risks makes sense when you can control your destiny and already have yearly big games, which is what P5 teams do.
Then both will get excellent bowl positions based on how they ranked in their undefeated seasons.In that context, what if 2 G5!schools go undefeated? Only we get the NY6 Bowl because of our brand? I don’t think that’s fair either.
exactly. playing our schedule and winning the conference has proven to be a way more valuable formula. Who cares what they say when our ooc game is GT or UNC. We get championships and bowl games. Even when we scheduled Stanford when they were on top, we beat them and the excuse was "Stanford is down this year".I have been a Fan since the day I got on campus in 1996. I honestly just care about winning the conference and making a major bowl, all things not possible when I was a Freshman. I have been on many road games but the conference championships, the Epic USF games are what I remember. We don’t need 2-1s to be relevant or to have fun as fans.
Not necessarily. Only 1 G5 is guaranteed a NY6 bowl. If we don’t get it, our next highest Bowl is terrible.Then both will get excellent bowl positions based on how they ranked in their undefeated seasons.
Win our conference, play NY6, enjoy ourselves, wait for realignment.
No! Just effing No! We have been a top 25 team for three years. We should maintain our value and demand 1 for 1.Should UCF accept a classic 2:1 that Scott Stricklin claims to now support (2 in the Swamp and 1 in the Bounce House)?
See "Based on how they ranked...". If we want to assure the NY6 then we should play well enough to be the highest ranked G5. Nothing unfair about that.Not necessarily. Only 1 G5 is guaranteed a NY6 bowl. If we don’t get it, our next highest Bowl is terrible.
It’s not fair. If I’m undefeated I want the highest possible bowl. Which is CFP. Rankings are unfair to begin with. GT, Pitt are good wins for Clemson but shitty wins for us.See "Based on how they ranked...". If we want to assure the NY6 then we should play well enough to be the highest ranked G5. Nothing unfair about that.
I agree, it’s helping us right now, but it’s not really fair.It’s not fair. If I’m undefeated I want the highest possible bowl. Which is CFP. Rankings are unfair to begin with. GT, Pitt are good wins for Clemson but shitty wins for us.
Really??? USC and Michigan are better than the Gators?? Texas?No, not a blue chip program.....now if a Michigan, Alabama, ND, Ohio State, Texas, USC my vote would change
Clemson is not a G5 team. You asked what if two G5 teams are undefeated then what happens. To shift and now talk about Clemson you seem to be confusing yourself.It’s not fair. If I’m undefeated I want the highest possible bowl. Which is CFP. Rankings are unfair to begin with. GT, Pitt are good wins for Clemson but shitty wins for us.
I’m showing you that just because our brand is better we would get the nod over any other G5 school now. No matter what. The same for the P5 schools over us. We may be better but we won’t know because their brand is better and they get the invite.Clemson is not a G5 team. You asked what if two G5 teams are undefeated then what happens. To shift and now talk about Clemson you seem to be confusing yourself.
Really??? USC and Michigan are better than the Gators?? Texas?
Florida is like #3 in the nation. Texas was 8-5 last year and lost last Saturday.damn straight homie......Fla has been crap most of the time since forever with the exception of a few seasons with Meyer.
Florida is like #3 in the nation. Texas was 8-5 last year and lost last Saturday.
Michigan hasn’t been great in years and lost at least 3 games last year and was destroyed by Florida in the Peach Bowl 2 years ago.
I get it if you don’t like the Gators, but Clemson and Alabama are better programs, not those 2