I've already explained to you once, political viewpoints are not a recognized protected class.
Are you intentionally missing this simple point or incapable of understanding?
The Great Lesson of California in America’s New Civil War
- Thread starter UCFWayne
- Start date
I've already explained to you once, political viewpoints are not a recognized protected class.
Are you intentionally missing this simple point or incapable of understanding?
Why do you believe minority women shouldn't be a protected class? Seems pretty racist and sexist.
I really hate when you do your "pretend to be stupid" argument that you use all the time, it's really annoying to have to type out everything piece by piece.
So you agree that it is OK to discriminate against black women? I'm glad the racist veil is finally starting to drop on the Democrats. Usually those screaming the loudest are compensating for something.
https://ucf.forums.rivals.com/threa...ught-having-sex-with-man-in-his-office.55923/
I can't believe homophobe Wayne started that thread.
I can't believe homophobe Wayne started that thread.
Remember when you lied and tried to claim that you’re a Republican who wanted a Republican candidate in 2016?
LOL!!!!!
I 100% voted in the Republican primary and wanted a Republican president. So no, I don't remember that.
He’s a republican, he’s a liberal, he’s an economist with an MBA. This dude’s really trying way too hard.
Youtube is effectively a natural monopoly, kind of like the power companies, which the government regulates so they don't abuse their monopoly.
Perhaps a free speech law should be imposed on any platform that has become a major venue for political discussion.
You could make a legal argument that when Twitter and Youtube were starting off, they promised free speech for all political perspectives. Now that they've become monopolies, they want to start censoring and going back on their original promise.
It would take years for rival venues to rise up, and I'm sure the Manhattan elites and the left knows this.
Perhaps a free speech law should be imposed on any platform that has become a major venue for political discussion.
You could make a legal argument that when Twitter and Youtube were starting off, they promised free speech for all political perspectives. Now that they've become monopolies, they want to start censoring and going back on their original promise.
It would take years for rival venues to rise up, and I'm sure the Manhattan elites and the left knows this.
Molyneux mentions that Mike Cernovich got a strike for showing Antifa chanting: "Do you want a red pill... How about a lead pill."
So if you show Antifa thugs threatening right-wing people, that's a strike! I guess that tells you where the sympathies of the censors are.
He’s whatever he needs to claim to be to prove he’s right in whatever argument he’s in that he created
Pssh yeah right, 85 obviously knows more about your voting record than you do.
I wanted a Republican president, I'm not a republican. I am an independent because I want fiscal soundness but and I also don't care what people do with their dicks. I thought the Republican party would be good for America in 2016 but we didn't get traditional republican fiscal soundness and we got an awful lot of caring about what people did with their dicks.
It's cute that you think something like having my MBA is so outlandish. Everyone I work with has their MBA it's not that rare in the professional world buddy.
Nope, 85 said you are a liberal, clearly everything you just posted is a lie. And I trust him on this, if you don't support Trump 100% you are a communist.
It’s not that MBA’s are rare, they’re a dime a dozen. It’s that you have spouted some garbage on the threads that leads one to believe that you don’t understand economic theory and have no business acumen.
You claimed to be a liberal earlier but now you’re an independent who wanted to vote for people who would bring conservative principles to lawmaking because it would be good for the country. I think you’re not quite sure where you stand.
I whole-heartedly agree that we, as a culture, are far more worried about the wrong things and not demanding well-crafted and reasoned policies from our lawmakers. And the lawmakers care more about re-election and reaching the top of the power chain than doing the job for which they were sent to DC. Bill Nelson’s recent response about the term limits question where he name-dropped Zuckerberg and said it took him a long time to reach the highest rank is a perfect example of what’s wrong with Congress.
I am liberal but I also want sound financial decisions. I have to make a choice what's more important to me every election except this one was easy because one candidate was awful on both things I stand for.
dont forget an independent. hes literally listed himself as everything up until this point. he should really consider taking one of those political ideology tests to figure it out once and for all. hes very confused
ORRR....people don't always have to fall into one party/idea set.
I'm a liberal but I don't agree with everything liberals believe/think.
It's good to be able to think for yourself....
That's not true. I voted for Trump so I 100% agree with and support every action he takes and everything he says.
Don't be ridiculous, politics are a team sport, you cheer for one team only and if anything is shown that has your team in a bad light, you try to discredit it. Fuk the truth.
i get that bq, but he literally has claimed to be a republican, independent, and a liberal. i dont agree with everything in the republican/libertarian party, but i dont claim to be a liberal either. that would just be a stupid thing for me to claim. im sure you would call me out if i said something like that. why not call him out for his bs?
I just want to point out that these are two sane posts from redice.
1. I didn't claim to be a republican. I voted in the Republican primary because I wanted a Republican president
2. I am liberal on pretty much all social issues
3. The fact that I intend to vote straight dem until the Republican party gets back to normal doesn't mean I will continue to vote dem after they are back to normal.
I really love how it is absolutely blowing the Trump nuthugger's tiny little minds that someone can claim to have voted republican but not swallow this insanity from Trump hook line and sinker.
Bob, seriously, I don't know what you are trying to accomplish by pretending to be a complete and utter moron, but whatever it is, it's not working. You might actually be a complete and utter moron.
I did vote for Hillary. You are aware of the structure of American elections I assume? I can vote in the repub primary and not like the results and then vote dem in the general. I know that I can do that because it's what I did.
When did I ever say you couldn't do that? Here you go arguing against stuff no one said again.
