You might have a bit more credibility if your guy Trump wasn't Putin's bitch.More revisionist history total bullshit.
You might have a bit more credibility if your guy Trump wasn't Putin's bitch.More revisionist history total bullshit.
For the record, I was disappointed Obama did not respond to Assad's use of chemical weapons. But hellooooo, this is 2019 and the issue is Trump's abrupt troop withdrawal from northern Syria.lmao Shookster again quotes a sliver of a reply and refuses to address the part that totally refutes everything he just claimed. Classic delusional Shookster
For the record, I was disappointed Obama did not respond to Assad's use of chemical weapons. But hellooooo, this is 2019 and the issue is Trump's abrupt troop withdrawal from northern Syria.
But Nooooooo, you can't talk about THAT.
Everything with you is a 'whaddabout?' in a lame effort to defend your Blowhard-in-Chief.
Actually I was talking about the Brits and the French that left the Kurds on their own
I'd like to read about these troops. Link?
Translation: No link.Do an elementary 2 second Google search and you’ll find s that the Brits and French have had their own SF forces in Syria aligned with the Kurds since basically 2015
Yet somehow the role of human shield only fell upon our troops
Translation: No link.
Ignorantly obtuse? Proven wrong? Go ahead? Damn, all I did was ask for a link.If you want to be ignorantly obtuse for the sake of not being proven wrong yet again then go ahead