ADVERTISEMENT

OT: The Army We Know Is Changing—Yet again.

There’s a lot of change happening in the Army right now. A lot of uncertainty, a lot of movement, and honestly, I’m really curious what the force is going to look like over the next year or two.

The Army announced this week its new Transformation Initiative, and it’s a major shift. With autonomous systems becoming cheaper and deadlier, and dual-use technologies advancing faster than our acquisition processes, the Army is pushing hard to adapt. The Transformation Initiative focuses on three main efforts: delivering critical warfighting capabilities, optimizing the force structure, and eliminating waste.

Some key changes include:
  • Fielding new capabilities like the M1E3 tank, modern UAS platforms, long-range fires, and integrating AI at command nodes to speed up decision-making.
  • Cutting 1,000 HQDA staff positions, reducing general officer billets, and merging Army Futures Command with TRADOC to better align force generation and modernization.
  • Restructuring formations by turning Infantry BCTs into Mobile BCTs for greater speed and lethality, and reducing aviation assets within Combat Aviation Brigades.
  • Canceling legacy systems that are outdated or no longer relevant to future threats, such as the AH-64D, HMMWV, and Gray Eagle.
At the same time, the Army is considering even deeper changes. According to Breaking Defense, proposals are on the table to significantly cut the number of general officers, possibly leaving only the Chief and Vice Chief of Staff as four-stars. The number of Program Executive Offices could drop from 13 to 9. And a major merger between AFC and TRADOC is being considered to centralize modernization and training under one command. PEO STRI is specifically mentioned as one of the PEOs that is targeted to disappear.

If even a portion of this goes forward, the Army will look very different in the next 12 to 24 months.



Letter to the Force Write up:

Army Leaders,

Battlefields across the world are changing at a rapid pace. Autonomous systems are becoming more lethal and less expensive. Sensors and decoys are everywhere. Dual-use technologies are continuously evolving and outpacing our processes to defeat them. To maintain our edge on the battlefield, our Army will transform to a leaner, more lethal force by adapting how we fight, train, organize, and buy equipment.

Consistent with the Secretary of Defense directive dated 30 April 2025, the Army is implementing a comprehensive transformation strategy-the Army Transformation Initiative (ATI). This initiative will reexamine all requirements and eliminate unnecessary ones, ruthlessly prioritize fighting formations to directly contribute to lethality, and empower leaders at echelon to make hard calls to ensure resources align with strategic objectives. To achieve this, ATI comprises three lines of effort: deliver critical warfighting capabilities, optimize our force structure, and eliminate waste and obsolete programs.

Deliver Warfighting Capabilities. ATI builds upon our Transformation in Contact (TiC) effort, which prototypes organizational changes and integrates emerging technology into formations to innovate, learn, refine requirements, and develop solutions faster. We will introduce long-range missiles and modernized UAS into formations, field the M1E3 tank, develop the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft, and close the C-sUAS capability gap. Command and control nodes will integrate Artificial Intelligence to accelerate decision-making and preserve the initiative. Agile funding, which shifts from program-centric to capability-based portfolios, will increase timely equipment fielding and accelerate innovation cycles. Adaptation is no longer an advantage-it's a requirement for survival.

Optimize Force Structure. Our focus is on filling combat formations with Soldiers. Every role must sharpen the spear or be cut away. We are eliminating 1,000 staff positions at HQDA. To further optimize force structure, Army Futures Command and Training and Doctrine Command will merge into a single command that aligns force generation, force design, and force development under a single headquarters. Forces Command will transform into Western Hemisphere Command through the consolidation of Army North and Army South. Multi-Domain Task Forces will align with theater headquarters to operate under relevant authorities. We will trim general officer positions to streamline command structures and revise civilian talent management policies to prioritize performance.

We will also restructure Army Aviation by reducing one Aerial Cavalry Squadron per Combat Aviation Brigade (CAB) in the Active Component, and we will consolidate aviation sustainment requirements and increase operational readiness. We will convert all Infantry Brigade Combat Teams to Mobile Brigade Combat Teams to improve mobility and lethality in a leaner formation. We are trading weight for speed, and mass for decisive force.

Eliminate Waste and Obsolete Programs. We will cancel procurement of outdated crewed attack aircraft such as the AH-64D, excess ground vehicles like the HMMWV and JLTV, and obsolete UAVs like the Gray Eagle. We will also continue to cancel programs that deliver dated, late-to-need, overpriced, or difficult-to-maintain capabilities. Yesterday's weapons will not win tomorrow's wars.

This is a first step. We have already directed a second round of transformation efforts to be delivered in the coming months.

Leaders, we need you to drive change to ensure we stay lethal, ready, and continue to build cohesive teams that take care of our Soldiers and families. Our Army must transform now to a leaner, more lethal force by infusing technology, cutting obsolete systems, and reducing overhead to defeat any adversary on an ever-changing battlefield. Our continuous transformation is underpinned by strong, agile leaders who act on their initiative.

This We'll Defend.

OT : USF trustees approve $407 million for stadium, infrastructure project

By JOEY KNIGHT

In what outgoing president Rhea Law called a “red-letter” day for the school, USF’s Board of Trustees unanimously approved the expenditure of $407 million for construction of its on-campus stadium and an accompanying infrastructure project.
The approval enables construction of the project to begin in earnest, with the stadium still set to be ready in time for the 2027 season opener against Louisville.
“It’s a transformative moment for our university,” Board of Trustees chairman Will Weatherford said during the recent virtual meeting, which lasted roughly 20 minutes.
“It’s about as big of a check as we’re ever going to write for anything at the University of South Florida. I’m a believer in measuring twice and cutting once. I think our team has done a good job of measuring here and trying to build in all the contingencies that you possibly can for a project of this size and scale.”
The final price tag (guaranteed maximum price) includes $348.5 million in projected costs for the stadium and $47.9 million for “East Campus Infrastructure” that includes utility and environmental investments, roadway plaza and walkway improvements, green-space development and security cameras. An additional $10.5 million for owner’s contingency (a reserve set aside to cover unexpected costs) was added.
The $348.5 million for the stadium is only $8.5 million more than the initial projected cost approved by the board in June 2023. Since then, some design and structural upgrades have been added to allow for possible future stadium capacity expansion and enhanced locker-room amenities, among other enhancements.
“In order for us to move to hopefully where we want to go potentially, with a lot of realignment conversations out there, maybe a super conference coming at the end of the day, we wanted to be able to add on to this stadium from a capacity standpoint and also a revenue standpoint,” USF Foundation CEO Jay Stroman told the group.



Link:

2025 Spring Transfer Portal: 4/16 - 4/25

It’s April 1st (in less than one hour) and it’s time to start discussing the Spring transfer portal. Players will have from 4/16 thorough 4/25 to enter their name. Graduate transfers can enter at any time.

It’s going to be interesting to see what UCF does. Many areas of need and lack of depth at every position group. Repole, Euliano, McNamara and others have to step up and help Frost.

What do you believe UCF needs to address in the portal?

The Current State of Florida Programs

Looking at the current state of the in-state programs, we can project where UCF may fit in going forward and what their upside for opportunity is. The big 3 had a golden opportunity over the last 5 + years to carve out their spot as the premier program in the state and have squandered that. Based on last year’s season, FSU (10-3) is far and away the best team currently, while Miami (5-7) and UF (6-7) were questionable at best.

Miami has been especially underwhelming considering the recruiting success they had. Let’s take a look at the last 5 years recruiting rankings for each and their end of season ranking. They had a top 10 class for 2023, but that was in part due to Florida NIL legislation that hamstrung the public schools, their shady donor Ruiz funding a large portion of their war chest, and incompetence from their in-state competition. Now if Miami doesn’t have success immediately, they’re in big trouble. Ruiz may be running away from the SEC (not the conference) soon, UF has gotten their shit together finally and organized their NIL collective, and FSU’s recent success has improved their recruiting dramatically. While 2024’s recruiting rankings are still very early, this is already starting to show

Miami RecruitMiami RankingFlorida RecruitFlorida RankingFSU RecruitFSU RankingUCF RecruitUCF Ranking
20188-14711-6211
201927-9618-6024
2020172291322-75-
202111-12-23-58-
202216-18-201152-
20237TBD14TBD19TBD50TBD
202426TBD12TBD7TBD45TBD

Compounding this is revenue by conference. Let’s take a look at the ACC vs SEC vs Big 12 revenue. Now obviously this doesn’t account for NIL and donations, but there is such a large gap between the SEC and Big 12/ACC, Florida is always positioned for success by being in the premier conference. FSU and Miami, however, are in a much more precarious situation. As realignment looms, they need to position themselves as best as possible over the next couple of seasons. This means no more 5-7 seasons and they must take advantage of a weak ACC for conference title contention. FSU is considered the superior product and should be likely to be swooped up if realignment occurs. However Miami is not a slam dunk 538 Analysis. As we have seen, timing is everything and the teams that do get added are ones that increase value or are on par for existing members. Name recognition only goes so far when it doesn’t translate to on the field success, and resting on the laurels of glory days doesn’t resonate to kids who weren’t even born yet to witness a “dynasty.”

SECBig 12ACC
$68M/year through 2034$31.67M/year through 2031$20M/year through 2036

What does this mean for UCF?

The P5 schools will now have to also compete with UCF for recruiting and power within the state. UCF will likely suck for the next few seasons and I wouldn’t be surprised to see a losing season or two. Historically teams that have jumped from G5 to P5 experiences growing pains as their level of competition ramps up. BUT, with a much larger warchest of revenue and NIL, a greater TV and market presence, and name recognition of the Big 12 in recruiting, we’ll see the program steadily build and improve. UCF is in a prime position, considering the recent sub-par seasons of the big 3 and their positioning for a larger revenue grab. While we may not see the translation of these changes immediately to wins, over time UCF will be competing more and more directly with the other in-state programs. I don’t think anyone expects Gus Malzahn to lead the team to the playoffs, but what he can do is recruit at a high level and hopefully bring the program up to a level of stability for the next coach to build upon.

Spring 2025 Football Portal 🏈

Portal opens up in about a week and a half

Going to the open practice I think we still need a WR, younger RB and OL.

Based on depth at positions would be surprised if we lost a younger WR or two that aren’t gonna play, QB and possibly some DBs. Hopefully no one on the two deep we want to keep leaves.

Would love if we could bring in the local WR from Ohio State, EPL and get a Harris brothers reunion at LB.

OT: Consumer Reports reviews 75 inch+ TVs for 2025

With consumers buying bugger and bigger tvs each and every year, Consumer Reports reviews 75"+ TVs. With potential future tariffs impacting possible pushing tv prices up, here is a review of 80 TVs in this 75"+ category.

I still like getting my TVs ar COSTCO because they give you 2 free extra years of warranty on every tv (in addition to manufacturer warranty) and of course, COSTCO is the easiest place to return/exchange a tv at no costs.

Never too early to plan for the next football season or a new addition to your home/apartment.

(If you do not have a CR subscription, many libraries offer thrm up for free to view online, inclusing this one:

Login:
jaquithpubliclibrary@gmail.com
Password: Marshfield1

KZ gets a dog...

The future of a football team whether it is NFL or college is based upon the QBs that it is able to recruit/draft and sign.

Really excited about the future of UCF with coach KZ who knows the position intimately and can recruit dogs at QB for this program.

Also, believe in his ability to coach them up well because of his learning experience under his college QB coach who taught him how to read defenses quickly while at the line of scrimmage before hiking the ball.

Kane Archer is a dog.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT