ADVERTISEMENT

At what point is the hyperbole too much for you?

Lulz...Trump has a TIME magazine cover of him on display at his properties. But it's not real. It's quite literally FAKE NEWS!!! Hahahahaha

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5875b7d1876_story.html?utm_term=.e9f230710448

TRUMPCOVER_COMPOSITE_WHITE.jpg


Real cover from March 2, 2009 on left. Fake cover claiming it's from March 1, 2009 on the right. Trump is not mentioned at all in the real magazine issue.
 
It amazes me the hatred the left and many on the right have for this guy.
Still want anyone to tell me how he has made their lives worse in the past five months.
 
Sir Galahad said:
It amazes me the hatred the left and many on the right have for this guy.
Still want anyone to tell me how he has made their lives worse in the past five months.
Click to expand...

Yet I see countless threads with content that is just as stupid coming from the "Cooler Right".
 
dude doesnt know when to shut up. id still take his crazy twitter rants over the 90% negative attacks he gets from the mainstream media any day.
 
He's such a role model.

Also - wasn't Melania's "cause" supposed to be bullying/cyber-bullying. Hmmm....
 
Last edited:
Everytime I see a Trump tweet I think, "That must be from 5 years ago"... and way more often than not, it turns out to be current.

It makes no one else uneasy that the owner of that twitter account, also happens to be the owner of the missile launch codes that could split the earth in half?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
There's a mass murderer with control of more nukes in Russia. There's a little fat psychopath with nukes in the DPRK. A guy that trolls Twitter is the least of my worries.
 
SublimeKnight said:
Everytime I see a Trump tweet I think, "That must be from 5 years ago"... and way more often than not, it turns out to be current.

It makes no one else uneasy that the owner of that twitter account, also happens to be the owner of the missile launch codes that could split the earth in half?
Click to expand...

Nothing he says or does really surprises me. He's been outlandish and outrageous his entire life so why stop now.

However, I am continually shocked 63 million Americans said, "sign me up for 4 years of that guy." I guess it just speaks volumes to the dedication and loyalty people have for the Republican Party. Kudos to them.
 
reddog4720 said:
Nothing he says or does really surprises me. He's been outlandish and outrageous his entire life so why stop now.

However, I am continually shocked 63 million Americans said, "sign me up for 4 years of that guy." I guess it just speaks volumes to the dedication and loyalty people have for the Republican Party. Kudos to them.
Click to expand...

It has very little to do with party loyalty and everything to do with Hillary. I hated Trump during the primary, but there was no way in hell I was going to waste my vote on Johnson or not vote and let Hillary continue to sell off the country for her own personal gain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: humanjerk and ucfchris1285
reddog4720 said:
Nothing he says or does really surprises me. He's been outlandish and outrageous his entire life so why stop now.

However, I am continually shocked 63 million Americans said, "sign me up for 4 years of that guy." I guess it just speaks volumes to the dedication and loyalty people have for the Republican Party. Kudos to them.
Click to expand...

If you took one minute to research you'd know that Trump was elected largely in part because democrats in blue states peeled off and voted for him instead of the train wreck known as HRC

but go ahead believing your line of bullshit and lies. You guys are good at it
 
UCFKnight85 said:
If you took one minute to research you'd know that Trump was elected largely in part because democrats in blue states peeled off and voted for him instead of the train wreck known as HRC

but go ahead believing your line of bullshit and lies. You guys are good at it
Click to expand...

Ok.

I wasn't questioning how he got elected. I was questioning anyone that voted for him....a majority of which were republicans. So not sure that is bullshit or a lie. I was simply applauding the Republican machine. You guys are a well oiled machine that will stick to party lines no matter the candidate. Democrats are much more divisive.

So I still pass along my kudos.
 
Last edited:
reddog4720 said:
Ok.

I wasn't questioning how he got elected. I was questioning anyone that voted for him....a majority of which were republicans. So not sure that is bullshit or a lie. I was simply applauding the Republican machine. You guys are a well oiled machine that will stick to party lines no matter the candidate. Democrats are much more divisive.

So I still pass along my kudos.
Click to expand...
Your party is more divisive because it stands for few things but the main stance of liberals is to be against semi religious white men of European descent who are are not gay. There are a lot of groups who fit into that mix and they all have a different agenda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight_of_Parrish
UCFKnight85 said:
If you took one minute to research you'd know that Trump was elected largely in part because democrats in blue states peeled off and voted for him instead of the train wreck known as HRC

but go ahead believing your line of bullshit and lies. You guys are good at it
Click to expand...

Many of those Dems were Union Members (considered a lock to vote for Hillary, so much so she never bothered to campaign in WI) in PA, OH, WI and MI.

Odds are, most of those union members are not watching elitist shows from NYC in the morning on MSNBC.

A's even a famous Democrat in the sports media field noted many times why Trump won and liberals lost: Millions (including Union Members) more were worried about their own economic future vs who was using which bathroom.
 
Last edited:
UCFKnight85 said:
If you took one minute to research you'd know that Trump was elected largely in part because democrats in blue states peeled off and voted for him instead of the train wreck known as HRC

but go ahead believing your line of bullshit and lies. You guys are good at it
Click to expand...

What about that little thing called the primary?
 
Knight_Light said:
Many of those Dems were Union Members (considered a lock to vote for Hillary, so much so she never bothered to campaign in WI) in PA, OH and MI.

Odds are, most of those members are not watching elitist shows from NYC in the morning on MSNBC.
Click to expand...

No, they are watching Fox from NYC instead.
 
reddog4720 said:
Ok.

I wasn't questioning how he got elected. I was questioning anyone that voted for him....a majority of which were republicans. So not sure that is bullshit or a lie. I was simply applauding the Republican machine. You guys are a well oiled machine that will stick to party lines no matter the candidate. Democrats are much more divisive.

So I still pass along my kudos.
Click to expand...
a lot, and i dont mean a lot of people held their nose and voted for trump because theyd rather him be president than hillary. that is the primary reason he was elected. if the dnc hadnt rigged their primaries, there is a good chance wed have a democrat for a president right now.
 
NinjaKnight said:
What about that little thing called the primary?
Click to expand...

Another nonsense question.

The poster above was referring to the "Republican machine". Well, that "Republican machine" was desperately trying to defeat Trump in the Primaries. Virtually no one inside the party itself wanted anything to do with him, but he ran an absolute guerilla grassroots campaign that broke every convention and norm, at a time when voters were desperately tired of being thrown another Jeb Bush.

I would say THAT is the difference though between Republicans and Democrats. The R field had at one point 10 people on stage, giving Trump a platform to hammer his opponents and let voters make their own minds.

The D's on the other hand completely sheltered HRC from the beginning and sabotaged ANY attempt for anyone else to even get in the race. We know that Sanders was sabotaged and even OMalley had criticism for even daring to take on HRC. The DNC wanted to assure that their horrid candidate was assured a win and they got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight_Light
UCFKnight85 said:
Another nonsense question.

The poster above was referring to the "Republican machine". Well, that "Republican machine" was desperately trying to defeat Trump in the Primaries. Virtually no one inside the party itself wanted anything to do with him, but he ran an absolute guerilla grassroots campaign that broke every convention and norm, at a time when voters were desperately tired of being thrown another Jeb Bush.

I would say THAT is the difference though between Republicans and Democrats. The R field had at one point 10 people on stage, giving Trump a platform to hammer his opponents and let voters make their own minds.

The D's on the other hand completely sheltered HRC from the beginning and sabotaged ANY attempt for anyone else to even get in the race. We know that Sanders was sabotaged and even OMalley had criticism for even daring to take on HRC. The DNC wanted to assure that their horrid candidate was assured a win and they got it.
Click to expand...

That's exactly my point. Republicans top to bottom hated Trump during the primary process, but yet came together to vote for him at the election instead of revolting against him....like many Democrats did to Clinton.
 
bqknight said:
No, they are watching Fox from NYC instead.
Click to expand...

So another network that bashed Trump during the primaries as they too wanted ANY establishment GOPer over Trump.
Heck during the first 12 months of the campaign almost right up to the Conventions, Trump got more positive CNN Coverage in the AM on Cuomo's show (he always brought ratings when he was on. CNN would have 25 plus min intwrviews with Trump on his phone without breaking for commercials) vs what Trump got from most at FOX.

Most GOP Primary voter was.voting for Trump as a PROTEST vote against the engrained GOP establishment, hence why so many in Congress on the GOP side (and all of the lobbyists) were against him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fabknight
reddog4720 said:
That's exactly my point. Republicans top to bottom hated Trump during the primary process, but yet came together to vote for him at the election instead of revolting against him....like many Democrats did to Clinton.
Click to expand...

Not really. Republicans consisted of most of the votes Johnson got. That peeled off at least 3% of support for trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

DaShuckster

The Government's at Fault for Train Derailments?

Replies
3
Views
234
The Water Cooler
DaShuckster
DaShuckster
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back