The only thing missing in your statement is the fact that his wife isnt exactly of high character.
Bernie is the scumbag socialist we always knew he was
- Thread starter UCFKnight85
- Start date
The only thing missing in your statement is the fact that his wife isnt exactly of high character.
Unless you're privy to something the rest of us don't know, Crazy, I don't see anything in Jane Sanders' life that would indicate she lacks moral character.
She secured loans based on fradulent claims for a college that clearly couldnt pay the debt service.
Lol the former PM of Sweden just kicked Sanders in the nuts with this tweet. Apparently Swedes aren’t as impressed with Bernie’s love and adoration for communism and Soviet despots as many US liberals are
That's fine, I have no idea how decent of a person she is. I just think 2 "mature" people with 6 figure jobs would very reasonably be expected to have a couple of million dollars in assets... especially when one of the homes was inherited. Seems pretty standard.
McConnell's worth is 10x apparently. He's essentially a career public servant. But I guess since his wife inherited millions nobody cares. Maybe we should investigate the Chinese shipping company her father founded ... I'm sure there is nothing to see there.
Why are you making this a linear pissing match between McConnell and Sanders?
One of these people is a rich person who espouses to hating rich people, kisses the asses of communists and left wing dictators, and runs every single year on the premise of "rich people are the cause of all of your problems".
The other is a rich person who has been Majority leader during a period of long term capitalist expansion and growth.
The entire point here is that Sanders has decided that he'll run around deciding who does and doesn't "deserve" their wealth while being nothing more than a life long government tit sucker who we now know sided with America's enemies, up to and including the Communists south of us who tried to park Russian nukes aimed at our shores.
Wasnt there some talk about an investigation into that a couple of years ago? Seems pretty fishy.
Few would argue that sanders is the face and predominant mouthpiece of the socialist movement in the US. Shouldnt it be alarming that the guy they point to as the face of their movement disagrees with the idea that Maduro is a dictator? Shouldn't that give you pause on what his intentions are or what he is capable of if he were to actually become president?
Pissing match? Seriously? I don't give a shit about either of their assets and neither should you. That's the point. YOU were the first person ITT bringing up number of homes and assets. It's irrelevant.
Honestly no idea. I only looked it up bc his name was brought up earlier and was curious.
Keep in mind you're communicating with some who has such severe derangement that he has convinced himself that democrats are trying to find a way to murder living babies. Like the most sinister shit imaginable. To him democrats are basically Count Dracula level evil in real life. He's got the same insane mindset that leads people to go on killing sprees or mail out pipe bombs. It's been wild to watch his decent into insanity.
Ok- I’m just trying to understand where McConnell comes up here? Unless he was also proven to be voicing support for communist and socialist dictators?
Its an attempt to find a moral equivalent. In all honesty, its actually pretty close to being one.
i dont like mcconnell, but did he make his entire political career about hating rich people while simultaneously being rich and owning multiple house?
I don't like Bernie, but did he try to make an argument that democrats support murdering living children because one democrat he knows contemplated an abortion at 9 weeks so his wife could start treatment for a cancerous tumor in her brain?
No, but neither did Sanders. The guy isnt "rich", just wealthier than most. The multiple house stuff is a non-starter for me.
yes but his worth actually puts him in the 1% that he rails against. the 1% threshold is a lot lower than people think.
i miss read your original post and that was a mistake.
that doesnt take away from your view that killing a baby centimeters from being born is ok. deep down you are still a terrible person.
So that's not my view at all. It's been documented that you favor non medical abortions much later in term than I do yet somehow you continue to ignore that fact
you said you are ok with aborting a viable babies up until its literally being born even though you admit that it is despicable radical and murder. im guessing you dont look at yourself in the mirror.
How are you so bad at understanding written text.
I'm pro choice up to viability (about 20 weeks)
Medically needed after that.
Uncle Wayne is pro choice up to third trimester (27 weeks)
If the mother dies, she dies, after that.
As a parent of a 30 week baby who, through my superior genetics, needed very little assistance to survive obviously I find your elective 27 week abortion pretty gross but yeah keep hiding from reality.
I'm pro choice up to viability (about 20 weeks)
Medically needed after that.
Uncle Wayne is pro choice up to third trimester (27 weeks)
If the mother dies, she dies, after that.
As a parent of a 30 week baby who, through my superior genetics, needed very little assistance to survive obviously I find your elective 27 week abortion pretty gross but yeah keep hiding from reality.
babies can be delivered via csection in about 1 hour if the mothers health is really an issue. my wife was an extreme case of preeclampsia, on a scale of 1-10 my wife was a 9. so i have experience with that and never once did we think about aborting the baby like what you are advocating for.
youve even admitted that aborting a viable baby is murder. why hide the fact that you advocate for murder? own it like the terrible person that you are.
Your wife and you had the benefit to make decisions on her and your baby's health based on the great laws we have that protect women. Preeclampsia is a scary thing during pregnancy and I'm sure that was difficult. I hope everything went well.
That benefit wasnt based on any law. It was based on medical advancements
Just a reminder everyone, @UCFWayne got so butthurt over me calling him a terrible person (for him advocating detaining and killing people because of the color of their skin) that he put me on ignore (or at least claimed to). Now here he is calling other people "terrible people" regularly because they are calling him out on his ignorance.
You can't make this sort of hypocrisy up, it is literally built into the red hat genome. Probably a recessive gene due to inbreeding.
You can't make this sort of hypocrisy up, it is literally built into the red hat genome. Probably a recessive gene due to inbreeding.
Medical advancements didn't give them the ability to make decisions on what was best for their individual family, the law did.
Their "decision" has nothing to do with being allowed to kill the baby. It had to do with the fact that doctors have the capacity to perform a procedure that can save the life of both the baby and the mother.
You're hopeless. So instead of arguing with you when you can't understand basic facts like what a mathematical median is. I am just going to make fun of something I remember about you.
Remember when you defended the use of the word retard because you coach basketball for the Special Olympics. Basically you were saying your players didn't mind when you called them retarded? The mental image of you yelling at your players to shoot the rock and then in the time out calling them retarded still boggles the mind to this day.
That is absolutely not true and a total non-sequitor. I NEVER called those kids retarded. The point was that they don't find the term nearly as offensive as you would like to believe and they would joke around with the word. More importantly, the term "mentally retarded" is no different than saying "special needs" but you act as though one is pejorative and the other is compassionate. Get a grip, seriously.
And the US parked nukes in Turkey -- although the Soviets lied about doing it, while the US openly moved nukes into Turkey. In any case, that's just strategic reality, not so much what's wrong with Castro.
What is wrong with Castro is how he revolted, and what he did to people after. That should scare you about Sanders right there.
My wife had preeclampsia too, although not severe and later in the pregnancy.
But I have news for you- do you know how doctors solve preeeclampsia past 30 weeks? They deliver the baby. I referred the testimony of a doctor's testimony to Congress to you about 5 times but you skipped over it every time. He said that in his 25 years of delivering babies, never, ever, has abortion been a credible or used solution for life threatening conditions to the mother in the 3rd trimester.
Even suggesting that abortion is the best recommended medial option was deemed absurd. They delivered the baby every single time to relieve the mother's condition.
And that is why your asinine defense of these disgusting, late term abortion laws that legalize elective abortions UP to birth is indefensible.
No shit. But you'll be surprised to hear that there are more pregnancy complications than preeclampsia in this world.
And in the third trimester, they're all solved by delivering the baby.
Christ, do you ever read the stuff you respond to? I literally said this in the post you just responded to.
Why don't you just admit that Democratic laws legalizing elective abortions up to birth are extreme, disgusting, and not supported by science and we'll all move along?
