Really an ignorant and shortsighted comment. Tells me that he has no understanding of what we are trying to do with our offense and program in general.
When you are comparing the takes of freaking Ping and Bianchi you should probably just delete the thread and get it over with.Ping said it was the right choice.
Bianchi trying to compare the amount of plays that we ran saturday vs how many we ran vs SC State.
That's an embarassing analogy with all of the variables. This guy has been a sportswriter for how long??? What a lazy thinker.
Just thought it would be something different than posting a 28th thread about the Big-12 expansion.When you are comparing the takes of freaking Ping and Bianchi you should probably just delete the thread and get it over with.
6 fumbles, 4 turnovers well.Has he seen Holman play? Milton played very well for a freshmen!
6 fumbles, 4 turnovers well.
I thought this was funny. Like a Jeckle and Hyde comparisonIt's very possible that a healthy Holman gives us a win. Milton had like 4 turnovers and a couple of bad reads. The defense is what kept UCF in the game. It is also possible that Holman plays like Bad Holman (BH) and the offense stalls continuously.
Milton starting could be the wake up call for Good Holman(GH) to start playing. GH is a he'll of a ball player. BH is frightening to watch.
Moment over. Go with Milton.That's what he's thinking. I'm not convince Milton's performance was better than Holman's, both completed some passes, both threw poorly. BUT, that was Milton's first game compared to ..... Let that sink in for a moment.
and several less touchdowns.Bianchi is correct. Holman would have had fewer turnovers.
That's what he's thinking. I'm not convince Milton's performance was better than Holman's, both completed some passes, both threw poorly. BUT, that was Milton's first game compared to ..... Let that sink in for a moment.
and several less touchdowns.
As the leader of #TeamBortles I can scientifically say you're wrong.Probably not.
Why don't you get graded on a curve?You don't get graded on a curve for your first or 15th game. Everyone keeps writing "it was good for his first game". 6 fumbles and 4 turnovers is good? Godfrey and Bortles didn't even do that.
Bianchi is correct. Holman would have had fewer turnovers.
It's very possible that a healthy Holman gives us a win. Milton had like 4 turnovers and a couple of bad reads. The defense is what kept UCF in the game. It is also possible that Holman plays like Bad Holman (BH) and the offense stalls continuously.
Milton starting could be the wake up call for Good Holman(GH) to start playing. GH is a he'll of a ball player. BH is frightening to watch.
Yes. I'll send coach an email after lunch.So...we are all in agreement...Milton starts here on out?
Holman was injured. That's why he didn't start. Correct?Bianchi is correct. Holman would have had fewer turnovers.
I assume it was a combination of the fact that he wasn't fully recovered and Frost wanted to try playing Milton. If it was only injury, then Patti should have started as the second string QBHolman was injured. That's why he didn't start. Correct?
Bianchi's takes are only based on generating the most calls/emails.
and several less touchdowns.
Patti would have been a disaster in IMHOI assume it was a combination of the fact that he wasn't fully recovered and Frost wanted to try playing Milton. If it was only injury, then Patti should have started as the second string QB
I wasn't talking about the passing game.Bad reads? He threw one pick that was tipped so questionable that was his fault. Found multiple receivers and had more yards passing in one game that Holman had in 1.5 games. Good pocket presence and enough sense to get outta dodge when the pocket broke down.
Not sure what game you saw but only terrible thing I saw outta Milton was ball security. Pretty sure Frost is gonna duct tape a football to his hands for walking around campus all week.
Really an ignorant and shortsighted comment. Tells me that he has no understanding of what we are trying to do with our offense and program in general.
Yep. That about sums it upYou guys better get used to Milton. You don't burn his red shirt and not play him from here on out. This is Milton's team now. Deal with it.
Why don't you get graded on a curve?
Don't most QB improve from their first start?
You can't compare Milton at all with those 2. It's Apples and oranges.
Just for starters, the pace was faster, and the RB is a true freshman.
Other reasons are Bortles wasn't a true freshman, Godfrey had experience around him, was on campus practicing longer, etc., etc., etc.,
his turnovers cost us the game.,..his skill had us moving and in the game in the first place.I don't think he is completely wrong. Milton turned the ball over 4 times. He also had moments of good plays. He was exciting to see and it was fun, but his inexperience cost us the game. However, I am OK with that. I did not care that much if we beat Maryland. I just want to see the offense progress as a unit.
Holman was injured. That's why he didn't start. Correct?
his turnovers cost us the game.,..his skill had us moving and in the game in the first place.
5% chance Holman comes close to making a play like that TD in first OT (just one example). Just doesnt have the presence, the skill, nor the touch.
#pineapplepasser
You guys better get used to Milton. You don't burn his red shirt and not play him from here on out. This is Milton's team now. Deal with it.