It’s fun to show what he and dumb ass crazy hole write to people who study this and work on this for a living. People who research and have degrees from major institutions and rake in millions in research grants. They think these two are completely out in left field, wrong, and stupid.
I showed one of his posts to a well-known pulmonologist in Osceola county and he read it, chuckled, shook his head. He said that guy sounds nuts and asked me why I’m going on this site to discuss COVID with crazy people. I didn’t have an answer to that. Lol
I showed one of his posts to a well-known pulmonologist in Osceola county and he read it, chuckled, shook his head. He said that guy sounds nuts and asked me why I’m going on this site to discuss COVID with crazy people. I didn’t have an answer to that. Lol
Everyone has to be stunned that we have over half the eligible population vaccinated and cases are creeping higher over the last few weeks. I really thought our leadership would have this under control. 😉
Look at that. And guess what's coming? Yep. BTW ...
If I'm Pharma, this fall, I'm recommending a 'tri-booster' of mRNA Booster + Influenza + Shingles in a single setting, if not the same vial. And it's perfectly legal, even to market it to people who didn't have mRNA at all, and went another route. Why? The US FDA only controls EUA or approval of individual shots, neither combinational shots nor schedule. Now the FDA strongly recommends and has only clinically tested Flu + Shingles on different weeks (if not 2 weeks apart), and in different arms, but ... why care!? Furthermore, if I'm Pharma, I'm also protected by the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immunity, so I have nothing to worry about with a 'tri-booster.'
Boom! Sales gonna love it! You heard it here first! Seriously guys ... welcome to the reality party.
So you're fine with doctors pushing things for everyone that even the CDC/FDA say do not do as standard? That's where I draw the line. It's bad enough it's not clinically tested at all, but when the CDC joins the FDA in not recommending something ... sigh.
Everyone has to be stunned that we have over half the eligible population vaccinated and cases are creeping higher over the last few weeks. I really thought our leadership would have this under control. 😉
That’s why people are dying from variants who aren’t vaccinated?? I can’t argue with someone who has shit for brains 🧠
You’re just looking for attention again
That’s why people are dying from variants who aren’t vaccinated?? I can’t argue with someone who has shit for brains 🧠
You’re just looking for attention again
Maybe in your wisdom, you could explain why vaccines designed for one strain are more effective against a variant than natural infection would be. I'm honestly curious about the topic.
There are studies all over the NIH and other sites on IgM, IgG, and IgA anti-bodies.
E.g., In 2021 April, the NIH and other sites were stickingwith their mid-2020 analysis that IgG-predominate immunoglobulin (mRNA vaccines, largely blood-only) were not as good as at the broad spectrum antibody response
, and definitely didn't provide for upper respiratory sterilizing like live-based immunities (live infection or attenuated vaccine) for spread/transmission, based on early results of mass mRNA vaccination (J&J Adenovirus wasn't en masse ... yet).
I.e., when you're sick, or given a live, attenuated vaccine, your body fights off all the virus, everywhere, generating IgM, IgG and IgA immunoglobulins. When you're given mRNA for a respiratory disease, your body fights the spike proteins in your blood, and results in IgG-predominate antibodies
, but not your upper respiratory tract. That is also related to my prior about spread/transmission with regards to upper respiratory (e.g., IgA).
SIDE NOTE: Now there are still impacts to cardiopulmonary system with spike proteins from mRNA vaccines, like the live virus (disease or any attenuated vaccine), and there is some worry that the Adenovirus vector mRNA spike protein approaches, like the J&J Ad26 vector, do spread to central nervous system (CNS) as well, not just cardioplumonary. All Coronaviruses (CoV), Influenza Viruses (IV) and pneumonia viruses (varies) impact the cardiopulmonary system, and can spread via spinal flud to the CNS as well ... all.
But now in 2021 June, 2 months later (i.e., short-term studies with low-participant), we're seeing some now claim Pfizer mRNA and its IgG-predominate (again, largely blood-only) is better than broad, natural immunity response with the IgM, IgG and IgA immunoglobulin trifecta
-- although at least Pfizer is still avoiding the upper respiratory sterilization question (which is not good for them).
Albeit people keep still thinking lack of disease means lack of spread/transmission, which has never been the case or argument anyone makes for IgG-predominate -- again, even Pharma avoids this! They focus on 'virus shedding' instead, which may, actually, indeed end up being better in the blood, IgG pre-dominate, via mRNA than natural immunity.
Also ... many (including I) also believe mRNA vaccines could end up being a great 'helper' in this regard too, and we'll see more mRNA 'boosters' that assist other immunity (natural or live vaccines), and can be created so fast to address new variants. That's the future, and it may very well be the case. But that's not what the current mRNA vaccines are doing, they are all Wuhan-1, not Alpha, not Delta, etc...
The biggest problem I have are the new yet very low-participant count studies, because they can easily skew results. Read into that what you will. It may be real. It may not be. We need more studies, with a lot more people. But the IgG-predominate is better is a relatively new argument, not vice-versa.
There are studies all over the NIH and other sites on IgM, IgG, and IgA anti-bodies.
E.g., In 2021 April, the NIH and other sites were stickingwith their mid-2020 analysis that IgG-predominate immunoglobulin (mRNA vaccines, largely blood-only) were not as good as at the broad spectrum antibody response
, and definitely didn't provide for upper respiratory sterilizing like live-based immunities (live infection or attenuated vaccine) for spread/transmission, based on early results of mass mRNA vaccination (J&J Adenovirus wasn't en masse ... yet).
I.e., when you're sick, or given a live, attenuated vaccine, your body fights off all the virus, everywhere, generating IgM, IgG and IgA immunoglobulins. When you're given mRNA for a respiratory disease, your body fights the spike proteins in your blood, and results in IgG-predominate antibodies
, but not your upper respiratory tract. That is also related to my prior about spread/transmission with regards to upper respiratory (e.g., IgA).
SIDE NOTE: Now there are still impacts to cardiopulmonary system with spike proteins from mRNA vaccines, like the live virus (disease or any attenuated vaccine), and there is some worry that the Adenovirus vector mRNA spike protein approaches, like the J&J Ad26 vector, do spread to central nervous system (CNS) as well, not just cardioplumonary. All Coronaviruses (CoV), Influenza Viruses (IV) and pneumonia viruses (varies) impact the cardiopulmonary system, and can spread via spinal flud to the CNS as well ... all.
But now in 2021 June, 2 months later (i.e., short-term studies with low-participant), we're seeing some now claim Pfizer mRNA and its IgG-predominate (again, largely blood-only) is better than broad, natural immunity response with the IgM, IgG and IgA immunoglobulin trifecta
-- although at least Pfizer is still avoiding the upper respiratory sterilization question (which is not good for them).
Albeit people keep still thinking lack of disease means lack of spread/transmission, which has never been the case or argument anyone makes for IgG-predominate -- again, even Pharma avoids this! They focus on 'virus shedding' instead, which may, actually, indeed end up being better in the blood, IgG pre-dominate, via mRNA than natural immunity.
Also ... many (including I) also believe mRNA vaccines could end up being a great 'helper' in this regard too, and we'll see more mRNA 'boosters' that assist other immunity (natural or live vaccines), and can be created so fast to address new variants. That's the future, and it may very well be the case. But that's not what the current mRNA vaccines are doing, they are all Wuhan-1, not Alpha, not Delta, etc...
The biggest problem I have are the new yet very low-participant count studies, because they can easily skew results. Read into that what you will. It may be real. It may not be. We need more studies, with a lot more people. But the IgG-predominate is better is a relatively new argument, not vice-versa.
