Do you just toss in anything random that has nothing to do with the topic about biological males playing in women's sports?
Global warming? Gas prices?
And the US Media sheep just assume we're picking on LGBTQ, instead of getting into the details.
I personally love it when the US Media says,
"Why don't we look to our NATO allies?" Because right there, they choke.
The UK Royal Marines didn't even let women at all until 2016. They are like the US Marine Expeditionary Forces/Units (MEFs/MEUs) in requirements. Although in the MEFs/MEUs, you have to be able to carry 155mm shells up the side of mountains.
Most of our other allies don't even have equivalent forces and
'readiness.' Only a few have the
'special forces' that match our
'forward combat units.'
People need to argue with the details, not just what they want to believe. I'm a pro-marriage, pro-LGBTQ Libertarian. But thinking this is about keeping gays/trans out of sports, is just as bad as thinking the military is about keeping gays/trans out, let alone thinking defending Manning is a good thing for serving trans personnel.
Manning, and her lawyers, have caused more harm to serving trans personnel than anything the right winger could ever do. E.g., lack of understanding the issues with Manning, and the arguments her
'complications' with surgery affecting her ability to even serve time in a jail cell, undermines the
'readiness' argument of any serving trans personnel.
BTW, as far as our allies
'readiness,' the Swiss Air Force is only available Monday - Friday 9am to 5pm. If there is a terrorist hijacking or other attack over their territory, the French, German or Italian Air Forces respond for them. No, I'm not making that up. Including the HuffPost, not just the Guardian.
It's no fly-by-night military outfit and it doesn't start work too early in the morning, either, as the recent Ethiopian Airlines hijack proved
www.theguardian.com
Hijacker Pro Tip: The Swiss Airforce Only Works During Business Hours
www.huffpost.com