You put the Amb to Ukraine first because he knows the ins and outs to the entire story. If you start with anyone else, they can only give part of the story. Next you bring in the people who verify each part of Taylor's story, the phone calls, the release of money, the request for the dirt on Biden, Guiliani's involvement.
Yeah, if the 'first hand witnesses' had accepted their subpoenas, stepped forward, and testified, this farce would all be over, right Crazy?
Money CAN buy you anything. Sondland used his money to buy himself a place in American history.
Senate Republicans are going to vote to keep trump in office in the face of a straightforward ironclad case with incredible evidence.
Most of America will think that Trump is corrupt but he'll stay in office.
![[cheers]](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/5628.gif "Cheers [cheers]")
bravo sir
Agreed. I think sondland, in any objective trial, will be the person who provides the most important evidence. If he corroborates his staffers then this is open and shut on impeachment. If his doesn't do it succinctly then questions will be raised.
I will be VERY INTERESTED to hear Sondland's testimony in light of the most recent testimony by Taylor AND given the last-minute changes he made to his original sworn testimony.
When a pedophile enabler is your best defense against Trump's batsh*t crazy antics, the House Republicans are in deep doo-doo.
Trump's not the target. Democrats are banking on senate republicans doing exactly what we all know they will do. They're not going to remove their only candidate for the 2020 election. Trump has high approval in their party. They will lose the whole government if they remove him, even though they know what he did they'll find a way to keep him in office.
Either they take the House charges seriously or they'll face the consequences in November of next year. And if they 'act' like they're taking the charges seriously, then they'll have to explain why they feel comfortable having a "trial" and a "jury vote" without ever questioning the all of the saga's actors who refused their Congressional subpoenas.
You know someone has his head up his party's ass when the issue in his mind next November is "did this strategy work?" versus "Given what we've all seen and experienced, do we want four more years of Donald Trump as our Commander in Chief?"
you are right, the dems are terribly partisan. the russian collusion strategy failed and now they are on the ukraine qpq strategy. i wonder what new strategies they will come up with after his reelection?
There are a lot of ignorant people out there.
i completely agree with you on that.
and yet the country is in a really good place today vs what every single msm outlet reported would happen.
i was told we needed to hear from the whistle blower repeatedly from members of congress. what happened? why isnt he testifying now?
