Yavanosnitch comin' up boys git yer maga hat pitchforks ready for this democrat never trumpet traitor deep state scumbag spy.
Impeachment Thread: Trump retaliating at anyone who wasn't willing to commit criminal obstruction
- Thread starter fried-chicken
- Start date
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ne-whistleblower-testify-congress/3811971002/
Whistleblower reaches agreement to testify, will appear 'very soon,' Rep. Adam Schiff says
Published 11:57am ET Sep. 29, 2019
The whistleblower who filed an anonymous complaint about President Donald Trump asking Ukraine to investigate a political rival has reached an agreement to testify before Congress, Rep. Adam Schiff announced Sunday.
lolwut?!?! or are you calling adam schiff a liar?
The revelation during the Taylor interview that one of his staff overheard Sondland talking to Trump on his cellphone the day after the 'perfect' call to confirm that Zelensky was 'on board' looks pretty 'smokey' to me. Sondland said to this staffer that Trump cared more about the Bidens than he did Ukraine.
Next week's Sondland interview will be very interesting.
Please note the date: Sept. 29th. This is November 15th.
Why bring in a person who alleges the final season of GOT is bad after you've seen it for yourself?
Closed door if they wanted to. The whistleblower is supposed to be gaurenteed anonymity by law. Its not a congressional decision.
thank you for pointing out the dates for me. so for months, the dems kept saying that eric ciaramella needed to testify. its finally prime time. lets her him talk. he is the one that got this all started anyways. why not start at the beginning?
Ignore substance and focus on whatever you can to discredit someone in order to protect your existing opinions.
The chuds do not care to discuss substance on this topic. Its best to just mock them as they stretcccccccccch reality to try and protect their dignity. Their conservative identity is more important to them than their american identity. They'll reluctantly trade one to protect the other. This is turbo-chudding at its finest.
When you can see and hear directly from the actors, why talk to an audience member?
I'm pretty sure the former corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor who made this claim took it back. How is that perjury?
He didn't take it back. He explained how the meeting went down. He listed people who were anti-corruption activists who were under investigation and she said that was unacceptable. He referred to a prior list of people not to prosecute who were in the presidents administration and said now you want a list of people at the US embassy.
Based on what evidence? Lutsenko does interview and says she gave him a list. She denies it. The State Department denies it. Lutsenko walks back the claim that she gave him a list, and re-frames it around the idea that he suggested a list to her.
If you're buying anything Lutsenko is pitching on this you're on the wrong side. The dude is currently under investigation for abuse of power.
So at best, it's he said / she said. How can you argue she committed perjury? Was Lutsenko under oath when he made his claims?
Do you realize who is investigating him and who funds that bureau?
What an idiot. How can he not just keep his mouth shut for once?
So are you running with the Soros controls the State Department conspiracy here?
Nope. But it does seem odd that Biden referred to Poroshenko as a good guy, then a state dept official had such an altercation with him the very first time they met, and the people who subsequently went on to attack the "good guy" are part of a bureau that was created at the demand of Obama and is funded by Soros. We've still never heard exactly why Shokin was fired other than claims by Soros funded groups that said he wasn't hard enough on corruption. Meanwhile, the guy at the head of NABU is convicted of interfering with the 2016 election on behalf of Clinton.
The vast majority of people in this country who don't follow this stuff all that much aren't stupid. They know Trump has shown himself, time and time again, to be batsh*t crazy. You can't tell me that most rock-hard conservatives aren't aware the guy is unstable.
Any Trumpster who believes that this impeachment process will somehow 'help' Trump is truly delusional.
Any Trumpster who believes that this impeachment process will somehow 'help' Trump is truly delusional.
Crazyhole:
Uses George Soros Conspiracy Deflection
Almost as effective as claiming that Trump locked his conversation with Zelensky into a super secret server.
Soros is a fugitive in several countries for doing this exact same thing.
I still want to know when Poroshenko went from being a good guy to being a bad guy. I also still want to know what made him better than the last guy.
Cliffs notes version:
Biden demands Ukraine fire someone who isn't doing his job and characterizes the replacement as a good guy.
Replacement good guy suddenly becomes a bad guy when he was doing what the last guy wasn't and can't be trusted.
The guy who investigates the good guy turned bad guy ends up being investigated for election tampering on behalf of the Clinton campaign and is convicted.
Cliffs notes version:
Biden demands Ukraine fire someone who isn't doing his job and characterizes the replacement as a good guy.
Replacement good guy suddenly becomes a bad guy when he was doing what the last guy wasn't and can't be trusted.
The guy who investigates the good guy turned bad guy ends up being investigated for election tampering on behalf of the Clinton campaign and is convicted.
Looks like Trump might have added an article of impeachment with his witness intimidation tweet.
Yeah, let's all laugh about Crazy Donald's latest twitter rant. It's all harmless fun.
It's not like he's the frickin' leader of the Free World or anything.
