Is this board just going to ignore that as more information comes out, it seems pretty clear this was an attempted coup?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im not ignoring it. I’ve been waiting for the chuds who say it was just a selfie tour to come forward. Alas, they’re too busy Circle jerking about vaccines…Is this board just going to ignore that as more information comes out, it seems pretty clear this was an attempted coup?
I was kind of waiting to see if any of the Trumpers would bring this up too, but you are correct.Im not ignoring it. I’ve been waiting for the chuds who say it was just a selfie tour to come forward. Alas, they’re too busy Circle jerking about vaccines…
What have you seen that makes it clear that it was an attempted coup?Is this board just going to ignore that as more information comes out, it seems pretty clear this was an attempted coup?
What have you seen that makes it clear that it was an attempted coup?
What would you call trying to create a national emergency (this was the plan) and have votes thrown out that they didnt like for no reason other than they didnt like them? And we know Jim Jordan was working with them (and others but those names havent been release yet). The only reason it didnt work is because they didnt think congress would reconvene for the vote that same night.
America witnessed a coup attempt. Now it’s sleep-walking into another disaster | Rebecca Solnit
What happened on 6 January was an attempt to overturn the election results and the rule of law. The threat is far from overwww.theguardian.com
He says presumably with a straight face.What have you seen that makes it clear that it was an attempted coup?
I laugh when I hear this called an insurrection. 🤣
I didn't know walking around unarmed could overthrow a government. We have more problems if so.
I seen.Wow...looks like Normandy. I seen more violence in a mostly peaceful lefty riot.
Jan. 6 Committee Says It 'Inadvertently' Altered Text to Meadows
"The Select Committee is responsible for and regrets the error."ijr.com
That's because -- like with your anti-vax BS -- you don't have a clue what you're talking about.I laugh when I hear this called an insurrection.
Hillary conceded the day after the election, this has nothing to do with this thread.Two years of a Russia hoax is all that needs to be said.
Exactly, Cubs79! Everything with these yahoos is "but whaddabout?" It's either "leftie riots this" or "Hillary Clinton" that.Hillary conceded the day after the election, this has nothing to do with this thread.
That's because you dont know what you're talking about.Lol...maybe I'm immune with the lefty riots of 2020. Lack of weapons and walking around the building for 99% of them. Not something to be proud of but riots are kind of normal these days.
Yes I still laugh if I hear someone call it an insurrection.
Politicians only cared because the violence came to them (although weak). This is what normal citizens are dealing with these days.
This is called changing the subject. I wonder why?Politicians only cared because the violence came to them (although weak). This is what normal citizens are dealing with these days.
The rest of the text says that whatever Jordan sent to Meadows was laying out arguments on how it "could" be constitutional. TBH, none of this matters all that much to me other than holding the 1/6ers indefinitely and being deprived of their constitutional rights. Get them to court, find them guilty, and sentence them.Did you even read the article you posted? They didnt alter the actual texts, there was a perioud added when it was transcribed, but the article clearly states the document that went along with the text was an outline of how Pence could give the election to Trump. So Ill ask again, what would you call an attempt to over turn an election if not an attempted coup?
Exactly, Cubs79! Everything with these yahoos is "but whaddabout?" It's either "leftie riots this" or "Hillary Clinton" that.
Plain and simple, this was nothing short of treason and if we don't treat it as such, our country's future as a democracy is seriously in doubt.
The rest of the text says that whatever Jordan sent to Meadows was laying out arguments on how it "could" be constitutional. TBH, none of this matters all that much to me other than holding the 1/6ers indefinitely and being deprived of their constitutional rights. Get them to court, find them guilty, and sentence them.
I think it could be an interesting discussion if the politics were left out of it, but I doubt that is possible.Of course it doesnt matter much to you, you and the other idiots would be ok with the reality TV president stealing an election and ending the entire foundation this country is built on. Anyway, sorry to interupt your vaccine and kiddy sex posts, so feel free to get back to those.
I think it could be an interesting discussion if the politics were left out of it, but I doubt that is possible.
Again, Hillary conceded the day after the election.Isn't that what happened with the Russia hoax? Steal an election with propaganda?
Poor analogy. We were able to discuss things like faithless electors, why not be able to discuss things like how the senate or congress can remedy electoral votes that come from states if those votes aren't legal? There are tons of potential scenarios where that could actually be a real thing in the future, and probably have happened several times in the past.Of course it isnt possible. When you have a president and some members of a political party trying to steal an election, then obviously the politics is part of it. I mean, thats like saying, "I would enjoy talking about the football game, as long as football isnt part of the discussion"
Too many people didn't take Trump seriously when he announced he was running for POTUS. It was a funny story. The media had a field day and most voters, regardless of their politics, found his candidacy amusing.This very well might be the biggest political story (unless you count 9/11 as political) of our lifetimes, and these guys arent even able to discuss it. We are no longer a serious country.
Poor analogy. We were able to discuss things like faithless electors, why not be able to discuss things like how the senate or congress can remedy electoral votes that come from states if those votes aren't legal? There are tons of potential scenarios where that could actually be a real thing in the future, and probably have happened several times in the past.
Too many people didn't take Trump seriously when he announced he was running for POTUS. It was a funny story. The media had a field day and most voters, regardless of their politics, found his candidacy amusing.
But when he actually won, the only people laughing were his sycophants. I think a majority of Americans crossed their fingers that the gravity of the office would hit him and he would rise to the occasion. But Trump has shown over...and over...and over again that he doesn't give a sh!t about anything other than himself. So instead of serious governing, we got a President who golfed. When he did involve himself, it was corrupt bullsh!t (as two impeachment trials showed.)
When this behavior led to -- surprise, surprise -- a vote to elect an old former Veep, he had a hissy fit and tried every conceivable way of thwarting the will of the people. Any elected official who supported (and still support) his anti-democracy shenanigans after the election are tools and should, by rights, suffer the same fate as the QAnon Shaman.
Fine. Lock up everybody that is even 5 degrees separated from what happened on January 6th.This is disingenuous as can be. None of the state votes were proven to be illegal and much of this stuff went to court. We can either talk about what actually happened, or we can talk about these hypotheticals. Id rather deal with reality.
You can start a thread to talk about that if you wish.Fine. Lock up everybody that is even 5 degrees separated from what happened on January 6th.
Then can we talk about what to do about a future scenario where electoral votes are unconstitutional?
The only one still claiming election fraud is Trump, remember?How about having real verifications of votes so nobody can claim fraud? 🤔
Nah, I think I'll use this one.You can start a thread to talk about that if you wish.
There are reports about state Republicans preparing for 2024 by playing games with their State's elector selection process to -- as Crazy said, present "faithless electors" in an effort to thwart the will of that State's voters.2022 and especially 2024 are going to be really telling for the future of this country.
Funny how 'unsecure' our national elections suddenly became once Trump decided to run for President.So we need to have unsecure elections because why?
So does it go beyond politics to you, where a discussion on civics and the role of congress should be discussed? Or is it just "Republicans bad"?There are reports about state Republicans preparing for 2024 by playing games with their State's elector selection process to -- as Crazy said, present "faithless electors" in an effort to thwart the will of that State's voters.
Back on Jan. 6th, I told my wife, as we watched as the riot unfolded on live TV, "Well at least, THIS craziness is going to bring Republicans back to their senses." Oh, how wrong I was!
The crap I witnessed surrounding Trump's refusal to leave office and his orchestrated Jan. 6th insurrection feels like some kind of bizarro sci-fi movie, not real life.
Funny how 'unsecure' our national elections suddenly became once Trump decided to run for President.
Fact is, Trump was all set to play the 'election fraud' game in 2016 until, low and behold, he won.
they conveniently ignore damning news , the scary thing is how much people shrug and it was less than a year ago . Convinced this country would allow a coup as long as gas prices are under $3 and the wifi works
There are reports about state Republicans preparing for 2024 by playing games with their State's elector selection process to -- as Crazy said, present "faithless electors" in an effort to thwart the will of that State's voters.
Back on Jan. 6th, I told my wife, as we watched as the riot unfolded on live TV, "Well at least, THIS craziness is going to bring Republicans back to their senses." Oh, how wrong I was!
The crap I witnessed surrounding Trump's refusal to leave office and his orchestrated Jan. 6th insurrection feels like some kind of bizarro sci-fi movie, not real life.
Funny how 'unsecure' our national elections suddenly became once Trump decided to run for President.
Fact is, Trump was all set to play the 'election fraud' game in 2016 until, low and behold, he won.
Completely! These retardplicans need to go to jail!Is this board just going to ignore that as more information comes out, it seems pretty clear this was an attempted coup?
Faux fox news does it LOLThis is called changing the subject. I wonder why?
I thought you leftists were against jail. And bail requirements.Completely! These retardplicans need to go to jail!
I thought you leftists were against jail. And bail requirements.
Once again, change the subject. You apparently are unable to have an honest discussion about Trump's efforts to thwart the will of the American People.Yup....criminals with no consequences. What could go wrong.
WTF?!?!?!?!?!? I said we should go after and imprison, if not put to death, anybody that is within 5 degrees of separation of the 1/6 riot.Once again, change the subject. You apparently are unable to have an honest discussion about Trump's efforts to thwart the will of the American People.
For all the self-righteous talk of the Constitution and American being 'the Land of the Free,' some here would happily install a dictator if his political pedigree was favorable.
I truly cannot fathom how this country got in this predicament. My best guess is that social media is to blame. As my Dad said to me back in the day when I was a teenage driver, your IQ drops by 20 points every time another guy that gets in the car with you.