https://www.npr.org/2019/10/28/7742...t-lt-col-alexander-vindmans-opening-statement
And he reported it when it happened. It's pretty obvious that there is going to be a paper trail showing ambassador sondland and then President Trump requested an investigation into Trumps main political opponent at the time in exchange for foreign aid and political access.
Is this where the argument shifts from "there was no quid pro quo" to "quid pro quo isn't a bad thing?"
And he reported it when it happened. It's pretty obvious that there is going to be a paper trail showing ambassador sondland and then President Trump requested an investigation into Trumps main political opponent at the time in exchange for foreign aid and political access.
Is this where the argument shifts from "there was no quid pro quo" to "quid pro quo isn't a bad thing?"