ADVERTISEMENT

NYTimes reporting Schiff(Pelosi) had outlines of whistleblowes report

Idiot doesn’t realize that every call the president has with foreign leaders does to the same place after his calls with the Mexican praise t was leaked.

Why did Schiff go on national TV on September 19th and say if not for the inspector general no more be would know about the complaint when he knew well before there was one.

I’ll answer it for you, he knew because he and his staff help write it.

They’ll want every call declassified soon to fuel their obsessive insanity
 
Idiot doesn’t realize that every call the president has with foreign leaders goes to the same place after his calls with the Mexican President were leaked.
Baloney. The phone calls to Putin, the Saudi Crown Prince, and this one to Ukraine were handled differently (i.e. given 'top secret' status) than all of the other calls with foreign dignitaries. Look it up.

Why did Schiff go on national TV on September 19th and say if not for the inspector general no more be would know about the complaint when he knew well before there was one.

I’ll answer it for you, he knew because he and his staff help write it.
For the sake of illustrating how incredibly STUPID this is, let's say that Schiff and his staff helped write it as you bizarrely claim. SO WHAT?

The Whistleblower is reporting A CRIME took place. What the hell is Schiff contributing to the report he had no involvement in??? The concerns expressed in the complaint are either found to be true WITH EVIDENCE or not. If, as you apparently believe, it was all a fabrication written by Dems trying to bring the President down, then that will be uncovered as part of the investigation.

But your righteous indignation seems a tad misplaced when the WH's attempt to quiet the controversy with a partial transcript has mirrored what the whistleblower was saying.
 
We know now that Democrats tried to coach fake Kavanaugh “assault” witnesses and get them to mislead the nation. They’d absolutely do the same here given what their intention has always been, which is to undo the 2016 election
 
We know now that Democrats tried to coach fake Kavanaugh “assault” witnesses and get them to mislead the nation. They’d absolutely do the same here given what their intention has always been, which is to undo the 2016 election
As did Schiff and it his staff. They had direct input into the report.
 
It is truly terrifying conspiracy theory fueled inbreds like you all are allowed to vote. You have set science, and this country, back by decades.
 
We know now that Democrats tried to coach fake Kavanaugh “assault” witnesses and get them to mislead the nation. They’d absolutely do the same here given what their intention has always been, which is to undo the 2016 election
There does seem to be a pattern here.
 
There does seem to be a pattern here.
Schiff said he had evidence beyond circumstantial on Trump for the Russian hoax, he lied.

Now we find out that Schiff and or his staff is behind the “whistleblower.”

The common denominator is Schiff and he should be tried for treason.
 
Schiff said he had evidence beyond circumstantial on Trump for the Russian hoax, he lied.

Now we find out that Schiff and or his staff is behind the “whistleblower.”

The common denominator is Schiff and he should be tried for treason.


And no, we dont know he is behind the whistleblower, you are just concluding that because he was aware of the whistleblower. Being aware and being behind it are not remotely the same thing.
 
And no, we dont know he is behind the whistleblower, you are just concluding that because he was aware of the whistleblower. Being aware and being behind it are not remotely the same thing.
I’m 100% certain he is.
 
Your certainty means nothing.
He has already proven he has. Let’s not forget his opening monologue where he invented a conversation that matched the written complaint more than it did the actual transcript.

Schiff is guilty as sin, he should be removed from his chairmanship because he is now a contact witness, also an admitted fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crazyhole
He has already proven he has. Let’s not forget his opening monologue where he invented a conversation that matched the written complaint y more than it did the actual transcript.

Schiff is guilty as sin, he should be removed from his chairmanship because he is now a contact witness, also an admitted fact.

Nothing has been proven, you are going off your own speculation, nothing more. The only thing we know is the whistleblower approached them, and they instructed him to how to offically file a complaint. Anything beyond that is speculation.
 
Nothing has been proven, you are going off your own speculation, nothing more. The only thing we know is the whistleblower approached them, and they instructed him to how to offically file a complaint. Anything beyond that is speculation.
So Schiff’s monologue was speculation? No
We also k ow one of his staff at the very least met with the “whistleblower.” We know said staffer notified Schiff at the least, that makes him a contact witness. Those are facts.
 
So Schiff’s monologue was speculation? No
We also k ow one of his staff at the very least met with the “whistleblower.” We know said staffer notified Schiff at the least, that makes him a contact witness. Those are facts.

I dont understand your contact witness narrative. He is the chair of the House committee on intelligence. This type of thing is literally his job.
 
I dont understand your contact witness narrative. He is the chair of the House committee on intelligence. This type of thing is literally his job.
LOL, so true!!!

And the Whistleblower complaint in this case was intended to go to him and his committee from the get-go for appropriate action for crying out loud!!!!

If there was any head-scratching about the process that was taken, it's the fact that the intelligence chief decided to run it past the White House before sending it to Schiff's House Intelligence Committee as required by law.
 
LOL, so true!!!

And the Whistleblower complaint in this case was intended to go to him and his committee from the get-go for appropriate action for crying out loud!!!!

If there was any head-scratching about the process that was taken, it's the fact that the intelligence chief decided to run it past the White House before sending it to Schiff's House Intelligence Committee as required by law.

Yeah, I am not understanding the scandal with this. IF he did help him write it that is a different thing, but at this point all we know is the guy approached an aide, who then told him (or her) how to file a formal complaint. I am missing the scandal with that. The NYT article says the the aide told Schiff of the complaint, but didnt even identify the whistleblower, much less had the whistleblower actually meet with Schiff.
 
I dont understand your contact witness narrative. He is the chair of the House committee on intelligence. This type of thing is literally his job.
It would be if he hasn’t lied through the process. He lied about the actual report, he lied about not knowing who the “whistleblower “ is, he lied about what was in the report and he lied about the actual phone call.

He has shown bias from the start and should lead the major committee tasked to investigate such matters.
 
It would be if he hasn’t lied through the process. He lied about the actual report, he lied about not knowing who the “whistleblower “ is, he lied about what was in the report and he lied about the actual phone call.

He has shown bias from the start and should lead the major committee tasked to investigate such matters.

There is no "would be". THis is his job. He was going to review and investigate the complaint no matter what. Just because the whistleblower approached an aide asking how to go about filing a complaint, doesnt change anything.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-...ence-committee-staff-before-filing-complaint/
Spokespeople for the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee, without commenting on the specifics of the Ukraine case, told CBS News it would generally be standard practice for the intelligence committees to tell a potential whistleblower to hire an attorney and file a complaint with an agency inspector general or the ICIG.

What they told the whistleblower to do, is standard practice according to both Republicans and Democrats.
 
Why haven't you people like Cubs figured out that you can't change these idiots minds. Gal and Wayne and bt don't base their worldview on facts or the truth, so when you try to change their minds using the truth 100% futile.

They have made up their minds.
 
There is no "would be". THis is his job. He was going to review and investigate the complaint no matter what. Just because the whistleblower approached an aide asking how to go about filing a complaint, doesnt change anything.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-...ence-committee-staff-before-filing-complaint/
Spokespeople for the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee, without commenting on the specifics of the Ukraine case, told CBS News it would generally be standard practice for the intelligence committees to tell a potential whistleblower to hire an attorney and file a complaint with an agency inspector general or the ICIG.

What they told the whistleblower to do, is standard practice according to both Republicans and Democrats.
But he lied about it. He lied about contact with the “whistleblower.” He 100% had his staff write the complaint.
 
Last edited:
Adam Schiff spent 2 years deliberately lying to the nation about what he supposed "had seen" in classified briefs about RUSSIA COLLUSION!, just a week ago lied out his ass and invented things that Trump never said while opening a House Committee meeting, and yet we're being told here that we simply must take his word that he didn't coach this whistleblower or help direct his actions, given that he knew about this before it was even filed.

Sorry, not happening.
 
Adam Schiff spent 2 years deliberately lying to the nation about what he supposed "had seen" in classified briefs about RUSSIA COLLUSION!, just a week ago lied out his ass and invented things that Trump never said while opening a House Committee meeting, and yet we're being told here that we simply must take his word that he didn't coach this whistleblower or help direct his actions, given that he knew about this before it was even filed.

Sorry, not happening.
Don’t forget that he was caught being wined and dined by Fusion GPS while doing all of this. Might be a coincidence.
 
The second term is going to be even more winning
i think this is going to back fire on the dems just like the russian collusion story. i hope trump wipes the floor with whatever terrible candidate the dems drag out there and then picks up a good number of seats in the house.
 
i think this is going to back fire on the dems just like the russian collusion story. i hope trump wipes the floor with whatever terrible candidate the dems drag out there and then picks up a good number of seats in the house.
Definition of Delusional = Trump is caught abusing the Constitution he swore to uphold by pressuring a foreign country to get dirt on his political foe -- and you opine that the true victim of the impeachment inquiry is going to be Trump's opposition. Ooooooookay. :rolleyes:
 


I really wish I could convey, in a way that you would be able to understand, just how little I care. Do I really need to post the study again showing how inbred people are more like to vote for Trump? I'm not worried about offending your snowflake feelings with that word, I'm worried about being correct. And I have been correct in saying that. At least you moved on from your obviously false claim that no one reads my posts. So maybe there is hope for you yet.

Meanwhile you are posting in a conspiracy theory filled thread with gal talking about Patriots being traitors and you focus on me accurately using the word inbred? Just insanity.
 
Last edited:
Definition of Delusional = Trump is caught abusing the Constitution he swore to uphold by pressuring a foreign country to get dirt on his political foe -- and you opine that the true victim of the impeachment inquiry is going to be Trump's opposition. Ooooooookay. :rolleyes:

Asking a foreign government to investigate and crack down on corruption, who has a history of corruption, is not a violation of the Constitution, you buffoon.

Whether you want to cry about it or not, there was/is a VERY sketchy investigation into Burisma and at the Bidens' dirty dealings were directly implicated in that entire process.
 
Asking a foreign government to investigate and crack down on corruption, who has a history of corruption, is not a violation of the Constitution, you buffoon.
This joker is DEFENDING Trump's stupid, ham-handed approach to getting dirt on Biden and calls ME a buffoon??!?!? :)
was there corruption in the ukraine, yes or no?
I could have sworn Trump asked about crowdstrike and Biden's son. Seems like the favor was pretty specific to me.

Watching our Trumpsters like Wayne and 85 twist themselves into knots attempting to defend their lying Blowhard leader is comedy gold. :clap:
 
This joker is DEFENDING Trump's stupid, ham-handed approach to getting dirt on Biden and calls ME a buffoon??!?!? :)
I could have sworn Trump asked about crowdstrike and Biden's son. Seems like the favor was pretty specific to me.

Watching our Trumpsters like Wayne and 85 twist themselves into knots attempting to defend their lying Blowhard leader is comedy gold. :clap:

Says the guy who just completed avoided the fact that Schiff lied about meeting this partisan whistleblower [roll]

Speaking of lying, remember when you tried to falsely paint the picture that the "favor" mentioned by Trump had anything to do with missiles? It didn't, you simply lied to make it seem like it did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
I could have sworn Trump asked about crowdstrike and Biden's son. Seems like the favor was pretty specific to me.

Watching our Trumpsters like Wayne and 85 twist themselves into knots attempting to defend their lying Blowhard leader is comedy gold. :clap:
Formal Title
  • Treaty Between the United States of America and Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters with Annex, signed at Kiev on July 22, 1998, and with an Exchange of Notes signed on September 30, 1999, which provides for its provisional application.
so there was corruption in ukraine. it seems like its perfectly legal to assist in criminal corruption manners.

its going to be fun watching yet another witch hunt blow up in the dems faces.
 
Says the guy who just completed avoided the fact that Schiff lied about meeting this partisan whistleblower
If you want to dis Schiff, it would help your cause if you got your facts straight. Schiff did not meet with the whistleblower.
Speaking of lying, remember when you tried to falsely paint the picture that the "favor" mentioned by Trump had anything to do with missiles?
Yeah, it's just a freakish coincidence that Trump asked his favor immediately after the Ukrainian President expressed an interest in buying our missiles. :)
its going to be fun watching yet another witch hunt blow up in the dems faces.
Who knows whether this moron in the White House will be convicted in the Senate, but the very notion that the American people will reelect him in 2020 is becoming more and more ridiculous.

Watching you and 85 as you slowly begin to grapple with that inevitability will be quite entertaining.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
If you want to dis Schiff, it would help your cause if you got your facts straight. Schiff did not meet with the whistleblower.

Yeah, it's just a freakish coincidence that Trump asked his favor immediately after the Ukrainian President expressed an interest in buying our missiles. :)

Who knows whether this moron in the White House will be convicted in the Senate, but the very notion that the American people will reelect him in 2020 is becoming more and more ridiculous.

Watching you and 85 as you slowly begin to grapple with that inevitability will be quite entertaining.
i want you to know that i am 100% behind the dems on trying to impeach. i think its going to backfire.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT