Kind of. Virus started in China. They didn't disclose how contiguous it was and allowed international flights. But, but they have 80,000 cases with billions living in a single country
I'd happily take a beach thunderstorm right now. It's 97 degrees in Lincoln this afternoon.
There are nearly 3.9 million people infected in the United States. Between a bunch of false negatives, people not getting tested with and without symptoms, I would guess the number is between 15-40 million. That’s in about 4 1/2 months. In 12 months, nearly 1/3 to 1/2 of Americans COULD THEORETICALLY have had this. As of now, get it and live or die. Obviously, 99% live.
Correct. There’s a lot of guesswork involved. Too many variablesIt's still just based on a guess. I think you're probably correct and maybe even low, but we still don't know the R/0 of this virus, let alone the CFR. Its all just projections based on the numbers of deaths and then assuming one of the other variables.
So which one is preferable?:Correct. There’s a lot of guesswork involved. Too many variables
It’s a bounded guess. You can tell R0 with reasonable certainty based on the initial rate of spread. R0 doesn’t matter if you know IFR and deaths. IFR can be estimated based on early antibody studies.It's still just based on a guess. I think you're probably correct and maybe even low, but we still don't know the R/0 of this virus, let alone the CFR. Its all just projections based on the numbers of deaths and then assuming one of the other variables.
It’s a bounded guess. You can tell R0 with reasonable certainty based on the initial rate of spread. R0 doesn’t matter if you know IFR and deaths. IFR can be estimated based on early antibody studies.
Yep people were saying that 4 months ago when we had 100 deaths and their shit first came out and was debunked. That ship sailed 140k deaths ago.I'm going to laugh when this is all over and it turns out Dr Ericson was right about everything.
Look at what they said the IFR was. At that time we were told that its 3.4% and they were saying it was .5%. They were saying multitudes more people had it than were reported and now everybody is saying that.Yep people were saying that 4 months ago when we had 100 deaths and their shit first came out and was debunked. That ship sailed 140k deaths ago.
Is there a point buried somewhere in all this IFR shit?Look at what they said the IFR was. At that time we were told that its 3.4% and they were saying it was .5%. They were saying multitudes more people had it than were reported and now everybody is saying that.
Do I really have to spell it out for you? This virus isn't as deadly as the panic porn would have you believe and Dr Erickson had it right. He was widely criticized and villianized so the guy deserves an apology.Is there a point buried somewhere in all this IFR shit?
Nobody ever said IFR was 3.4%. CFR was 3.4% early on. Nobody implied that was the IFR. Initial estimates were below 1%.Look at what they said the IFR was. At that time we were told that its 3.4% and they were saying it was .5%. They were saying multitudes more people had it than were reported and now everybody is saying that.
Nobody ever said IFR was 3.4%. CFR was 3.4% early on. Nobody implied that was the IFR. Initial estimates were below 1%.
Those numbers are CFR not IFR. Maybe that clears up a bit of your confusion."Their entire argument rests on the notion that the mortality rate from COVID is actually very low, even less than 0.1% (roughly the typical mortality rate from the flu). Actual studies have found that the mortality rate varies from 3.6% (Baud et al. 2020) to 1.4% (Wu et al. 2020). I have yet to see an estimate based on confirmed cases that was anywhere near the number these emergency doctors came up with (see Note 3). So how did they get such a low number? Easy: they’re bad at statistics."
Essentially the same thing, especially at this point in time when we don't know the actual number of infections or cases.Those numbers are CFR not IFR. Maybe that clears up a bit of your confusion.
Nobody ever said IFR was 3.4%. CFR was 3.4% early on. Nobody implied that was the IFR. Initial estimates were below 1%.
I just backed my way through the numbers a little bit using a 14 day incubation period and an R/0 of 2.0 and came up with 16 weeks to herd immunity if everything is left unimpeded. Thats about how long it took for New York to get there. Then I replaced the .03 with .004 because New York has a higher percentage of elderly deaths and if its predominately people under the age of 55 that get this we should reach herd immunity with something around 48000 additional deaths, or a 16 week average of 400/day. Obviously the numbers will be much higher in the beginning and much lower at the very end, but that does work out to the 800-1000 daily deaths we are seeing right now.Gets confusing to figure out especially with sky diving covid deaths.
You misunderstand herd immunity. NYC has reached a point that with current safeguards and distancing measures they have lowered the spread. That is different from herd immunity. Estimates are that social distancing and other measures have artificially lowered the reproduction rate of the virus to around 1 or just above. At a R0 of 1.1 for example the virus would stop spreading after 9% infection. It’s hard to really estimate how much the measures in place have decreased R0 temporarily.Help me noodle this one out:
Looking at New York, their deaths are down to the point where it looks like they've reached herd immunity. Let's say we go with 50%, because that number seems to get thrown around as being in the probable range. That would put the IFR at .3%, correct? So if we extrapolate that out for the whole country, we would be looking at about 480,000 deaths by the time herd immunity is reached (160 million infections). Since we have about 30% of that number of deaths we could probably assume that there are/have been 48 million infections so far.
Obviously this is based on the assumption that herd immunity is 50% and that New York is close to that. The death toll in New York is probably much higher than what will be typical because of the number of elderly people there that were exposed to it so that .3% IFR is probably going to be somewhat lower, possibly as low as 200-250k total deaths if a high enough percentage of cases are among the young and healthy.
Tear that one apart if you'd like. I'm interested in your thoughts.
You misunderstand herd immunity. NYC has reached a point that with current safeguards and distancing measures they have lowered the spread. That is different from herd immunity. Estimates are that social distancing and other measures have artificially lowered the reproduction rate of the virus to around 1 or just above. At a R0 of 1.1 for example the virus would stop spreading after 9% infection. It’s hard to really estimate how much the measures in place have decreased R0 temporarily.
Jesus Christ, the Chuds here STILL want to defend Florida even after the State began shattering the one-day State and national records on the pandemic.Ny population 19.44 mil Covid positives 406.807 deaths 32,446
FL population 22 mil Covid positives 3272241 mil deaths 4805
Early we kept it under control other than SE fla and Tampa/Orlando. All of those are large tourist areas. We didn't ship covid9 patients back to nursing homes, which is the main reason for NY an NJ high death rates. We still don't send them back. In fact we have opened a # of covid only homes that can give more care than normal nursing homes, but less than full blown hospitals. So those who don't get real bad, and those well enough to get out of hospital have a place to go without putting others at risk. We still are not allowing visitors in nursing homes..Jesus Christ, the Chuds here STILL want to defend Florida even after the State began shattering the one-day State and national records on the pandemic.
Here's a stat for you: NY hit its peak back in EARLY APRIL for crying out loud!!! What's Florida's excuse??!?
Florida's surge to Number One occurred after its lamebrained Governor DeSantis sounded the 'all clear' bell and reopened the state.
Jesus Christ, the Chuds here STILL want to defend Florida even after the State began shattering the one-day State and national records on the pandemic.
Here's a stat for you: NY hit its peak back in EARLY APRIL for crying out loud!!! What's Florida's excuse??!?
Florida's surge to Number One occurred after its lamebrained Governor DeSantis sounded the 'all clear' bell and reopened the state.
Good info. Quelled any thought of a conspiracy. Asked about the details. Responded that it was a motorcycle accident. Asked if it was removed from the Covid count. Said he asked the state to remove but didn’t know if it was. Turns out it was. Good to keep an accurate count.
Trump's fault for both.Trump's fault for New York.
Desantis fault for Florida.
Don't you think about blaming China that started the spread or Cuomo
Governors don't have access to the intelligence or supply chain.True...it can't ever be a governors fault which sent covid patients to nursing homes to kill a bunch of elderly folks. Trump did it! Hail Cuomo
Dems know shut downs work Biden the serial sniffer has been locked in a basement where he can't grope and sniff young girls, and walah..... no virus.True...it can't ever be a governors fault which sent covid patients to nursing homes to kill a bunch of elderly folks. Trump did it! Hail Cuomo
None of those problems are fixed. Schools are staying closed, unemployment is highest in years, I'm sure mental health is still down. Its just that now a bunch of people are also dead. Florida had the most deaths in the country yesterday. 1 out of every 3 people who died in Florida yesterday died of covid-19.And closing businesses for a year and still spreading a virus is better. Better to starve, increase child abuse, increase domestic abuse, destroy financial health, and destroy mental health with a virus that likely kills less than .5% of healthy folks.
Strange, because that doesn't seem to be happening in EVERY other country on the planet.And closing businesses for a year and still spreading a virus is better. Better to starve, increase child abuse, increase domestic abuse, destroy financial health, and destroy mental health with a virus that likely kills less than .5% of healthy folks.
Tests are up 37%, cases are up 194%, it's more than just testing.Most countries aren't testing like us. Most people wouldn't even know they had it without a test.
This x 100.And? Unless people are dropping like flies the healthiest need to move forward. Other countries aren't testing asymptomatic people.
Deaths are a lagging indicator. You are saying that we should wait until people start dying before we act?And? Unless people are dropping like flies the healthiest need to move forward. Other countries aren't testing asymptomatic people.
Deaths are a lagging indicator. You are saying that we should wait until people start dying before we act?
The 7 day rolling average of deaths in Florida is up 141% over the past 2 weeks (44->106).Deaths are a lagging indicator. You are saying that we should wait until people start dying before we act?