lol
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutionstime.com
>pays to talk about politics on a directional schools football message board
Poor guy probably stays awake at night fearful that a leftist socialist is trying to make sure he isn’t bankrupted by a medical bill.
>steals meme format
ucf.forums.rivals.com
lol
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions
no i'm mostly worried about the
>steals meme format
>still wrong
>of all flavors of bitch to be, you chose silly
Search results for query: russia
Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.
First off, I thought it was hilarious that the thread's OP apparently thought the Time article was an expose'. Par for the course.
First off, I thought it was hilarious that the thread's OP apparently thought the Time article was an expose'. Par for the course.
But I find it equally eyebrow-raising that Happy thinks the article was "a little too clean and one sided." One-sided? uh, yeah, it certainly was. It was an investigative piece for crying out loud!
The article outlines in detail how a variety of concerned Americans - liberals and conservatives, big business and big labor, and countless average Americans - all worked together to insure a fair and impartial election. We know from what happened after the election (failure to concede, 60+ fruitless court cases, and a Capitol insurrection) that 'the other side' tried its damnedest to thwart the will of the people. That one-sided story has been told countless places. I found 'the rest of the story' (as the old conservative commentator, Paul Harvey, used to say) to be fascinating. Congrats to Time.
you always talk like you're speaking to a crowd, but i never see anyone agree with you lmao. anyways, have this
they staged a coup to *checks notes* prevent a coup. its for your own good, Winston
First off, I thought it was hilarious that the thread's OP apparently thought the Time article was an expose'. Par for the course.
But I find it equally eyebrow-raising that Happy thinks the article was "a little too clean and one sided." One-sided? uh, yeah, it certainly was. It was an investigative piece for crying out loud!
The article outlines in detail how a variety of concerned Americans - liberals and conservatives, big business and big labor, and countless average Americans - all worked together to insure a fair and impartial election. We know from what happened after the election (failure to concede, 60+ fruitless court cases, and a Capitol insurrection) that 'the other side' tried its damnedest to thwart the will of the people. That one-sided story has been told countless places. I found 'the rest of the story' (as the old conservative commentator, Paul Harvey, used to say) to be fascinating. Congrats to Time.
no, they literally said they had planned another 400 protests if their rigging didn't work. I know you really want to believe you're still fighting the good fight, but you just aren't. Manipulating the flow of available information, using institutions like 90% of media, non-STEM academia, hollywood, 90% of social media to sway popular opinion is not worthy of context. The left is not a viable sparring partner because their tactics are to humiliate and destroy, to gut you of the will the think differently from the tribe. Not falling in line has become a taboo, and branding half the nation as racist, sexist, transphobic boogeymen has become a dull knife, but a knife nonetheless that they will twist into your back when you're sleeping.
