ADVERTISEMENT

This is interesting ...scientist and doctors speaking out

All the fired healthcare pros and those about to be canned are coming out of the woodworks. There are around 5 or 10 and growing by the day that I have seen blowing the whistle on vaccine injuries not being reported.

Kilian estimated that 80 percent of the patients she saw in the ER during the past month who had inexplicable symptoms were “double vaxxed.”


BTW, where is our fully approved FDA Pfizer comerarity , so we can sue and make sure our family is taken care of should an injury occur? All smoke and mirrors. They would go broke if that were to happen.

Color me truly shocked to find that the website you're linking is run by anti-vaxxers who got themselves run off of YouTube for publishing lies and conspiracy theories.

LifeSiteNews' YouTube channel was banned in February 2021 for persistently promoting COVID-19 misinformation. One video claimed that COVID-19 was "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public". Another promoted anti-vaccine sentiment, cast doubt on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, and stated that COVID-19 "isn’t really killing people right and left that weren’t probably gonna die within the year anyway". These claims contradicted the scientific consensus and reports from authorities like the World Health Organization, and violated YouTube policies on promotion of health misinformation.[27]
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ucfmikes
Color me truly shocked to find that the website you're linking is run by anti-vaxxers who got themselves run off of YouTube for publishing lies and conspiracy theories.

LifeSiteNews' YouTube channel was banned in February 2021 for persistently promoting COVID-19 misinformation. One video claimed that COVID-19 was "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public". Another promoted anti-vaccine sentiment, cast doubt on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, and stated that COVID-19 "isn’t really killing people right and left that weren’t probably gonna die within the year anyway". These claims contradicted the scientific consensus and reports from authorities like the World Health Organization, and violated YouTube policies on promotion of health misinformation.[27]

Yeah, she's part of a well funded network of anti vaxxers. :rolleyes:

I could spend all day posting healthcare pros who are either being injured themselves , or are reporting vaccine injuries. As in thousands. More and more come out of the closet each day.

But please, take your 3rd,4th and 5th boosters in the next year like a good little lambchop and get some molnupiravir to hold you over between jabs. Dr. Fauci will take good care of you. Unless of course you are the one injured, then you become a leper to society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS
I could spend all day
You could spend all day at a help desk answering calls from little old ladies that are having connectivity issues

Why is the worlds foremost expert on covid and vaccines spending time trying to convince 10 people in the WC Additionally, 6-7 of them at least think that you’re a quack or don’t read your posts

It just amazed me how these anti-vaxxers, penis whackers hear about all of these COVID vaccination side effects, but don’t actually work in healthcare or hear it in person.
They only know it from their outlier anti-vax Twitter sources
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: DaShuckster
Color me truly shocked to find that the website you're linking is run by anti-vaxxers who got themselves run off of YouTube for publishing lies and conspiracy theories.

LifeSiteNews' YouTube channel was banned in February 2021 for persistently promoting COVID-19 misinformation. One video claimed that COVID-19 was "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public". Another promoted anti-vaccine sentiment, cast doubt on the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, and stated that COVID-19 "isn’t really killing people right and left that weren’t probably gonna die within the year anyway". These claims contradicted the scientific consensus and reports from authorities like the World Health Organization, and violated YouTube policies on promotion of health misinformation.[27]
Is social media banning someone really that good of an argument point nowadays? They’re basically picking their favorite narrative on a lot of issues and banning anything that contradicts it.
 
Is social media banning someone really that good of an argument point nowadays? They’re basically picking their favorite narrative on a lot of issues and banning anything that contradicts it.
I guess that's one way to spin groups getting banned from sites for spewing COVID-19 misinformation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ucfmikes
Is social media banning someone really that good of an argument point nowadays? They’re basically picking their favorite narrative on a lot of issues and banning anything that contradicts it.

I was less interested in the banning and more interested in the batshit crazy video that this site was publishing.
 
I was less interested in the banning and more interested in the batshit crazy video that this site was publishing.
And yet they were banned regardless. We're silencing a lot of experts these days, a lot of whistleblowers, a number of peer reviewed studies.

And why? Because they are allegedly batsh-- crazy. And yet some are peer reviewed by experts.
 
I was less interested in the banning and more interested in the batshit crazy video that this site was publishing.
I didn’t watch the video but I’m reminded of the quote: “I will let you ban hate speech as long as you let me define hate speech.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: wjustincottrell
I didn’t watch the video but I’m reminded of the quote: “I will let you ban hate speech as long as you let me define hate speech.”

As of today, these are still private companies that have the right to dictate what does or doesn't get onto their platforms. Like it or not.

If Congress formally changes their status to a public utility then the case for stopping deplatforming becomes more clear.
 
As of today, these are still private companies that have the right to dictate what does or doesn't get onto their platforms. Like it or not.
If Congress formally changes their status to a public utility then the case for stopping deplatforming becomes more clear.
^ This I can agree with.
 
As of today, these are still private companies that have the right to dictate what does or doesn't get onto their platforms. Like it or not.

If Congress formally changes their status to a public utility then the case for stopping deplatforming becomes more clear.
I agree with that. But maybe then we don’t use the private companies’ arbitrary standards as evidence of sanity or correctness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wjustincottrell
maybe then we don’t use the private companies’ arbitrary standards
In its safety section of Community Guidelines, Facebook says it will “remove content, disable accounts, and work with law enforcement when we believe there is a genuine risk of physical harm or direct threats to public safety.” This includes suicide and self-injury posts.

Yeah, real 'arbitrary' stuff like this, huh sk8? :rolleyes:
 
FOIA wormer gate exposed as a fraud

How sick our own public health agencies conspire against us. Captured and owned by pharma

 
FOIA wormer gate exposed as a fraud

How sick our own public health agencies conspire against us. Captured and owned by pharma


circlejerk.gif
 
FOIA wormer gate exposed as a fraud

How sick our own public health agencies conspire against us. Captured and owned by pharma

Total Mass Media fabrication, repeatedly ... even their 'source' stated the Mass Media utterly misappropriated what he stated, and absolutely had no basis for anything related to ER visits at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boston.Knight
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT