Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here I'll make it something you can be outraged about too.
Hey listen police officer I know I was speeding but I'm the black Democrat mayor of a liberal sanctuary city and if you write me a ticket I will fire you. If you look into me beating my wife I'll fire you. If you are investigating me for child pornography I'll fire you.
Evidence doesn't come out for us to approve of or not approve of in an investigation. The investigators have a reason to investigate. Once they decide to convict or not we'll see evidence.Speeding is against the law, but if the cop didn't have it on camera or speed gun it would be tough to prove. Same with wife beating and child porn, there needs to be evidence or probable cause to start those investigations. Where is the evidence of Trump breaking any laws or threatening to fire people if they investigate him?
Evidence doesn't come out for us to approve of or not approve of in an investigation. The investigators have a reason to investigate. Once they decide to convict or not we'll see evidence.
Did you see what his lawyer said in the top post of this thread.Stop going on crazy tangents. When did Trump threaten to fire people for investigating him?
Did you see what his lawyer said in the top post of this thread.
YesI don't see where it says Trump fired Comey for wanting to investigate him. Can you provide a quote saying that?
Hope that helps
Yes
Hope that helps
See linkSo no quote? Just making stuff up again I see...
You must be one of those people who graduated high school with a less than 9th grade reading comprehension level.See link
Please no personal attacks. Facts only.You must be one of those people who graduated high school with a less than 9th grade reading comprehension level.
Oh, given the incontrovertible evidence you’ve put out in this thread, that’s a stronger fact than anything you spew out.Please no personal attacks. Facts only.
Please read the quote and get back to me.Oh, given the incontrovertible evidence you’ve put out in this thread, that’s a stronger fact than anything you spew out.
Everyone in the thread has read the quote and told you that you’re reading it wrong. I can’t help you if you persist in being stupid.Please read the quote and get back to me.
I’m attacking his inability to understand how that article does not prove obstruction and yet he persists. Apparently you share the same inability to comprehend that article.lol so far the Trumpets have only hurled personal attacks and completely yawned this away.
Typical.
I’m attacking his inability to understand how that article does not prove obstruction and yet he persists. Apparently you share the same inability to comprehend that article.
You made your comment right behind mine so I assumed that you were referring to my comment to FC. I wasn't making something up to fit any narrative. Relax.
I don't understand what you're confused about. I never said I wasn't talking to you, just that I misunderstood your earlier post.You literally quoted me, and now you are saying you weren't talking about me?
Wow.
"If you can't promise me that youre not looking into one of my many crimes I will fire you to make sure you aren't"Everyone in the thread has read the quote and told you that you’re reading it wrong. I can’t help you if you persist in being stupid.
"If you can't promise me that youre not looking into one of my many crimes I will fire you to make sure you aren't"
-45
That wasn’t the quote at all from the article. This context from the article (provided in the first line of the VERY NEXT paragraph) in the OP matters: "Comey had previously said that he told Trump he wasn't the focus of an investigation but that the president pressed him to make a public statement.""If you can't promise me that youre not looking into one of my many crimes I will fire you to make sure you aren't"
-45
"Tell the media you aren't investigating me or else I'll fire you"That wasn’t the quote at all from the article. This context from the article (provided in the first line of the VERY NEXT paragraph) in the OP matters: "Comey had previously said that he told Trump he wasn't the focus of an investigation but that the president pressed him to make a public statement."
Then, if you listened to Comey's interviews, Comey said he wasn't going to make that statement. Even though he'd made similar statements in other cases. Which corroborates the context provided above.
The quote that you are referencing from Giuliani in the linked story refers to Comey not wanting to make the public statement, not that he wouldn't tell Trump he wasn't a target. Here's Giuliani's quote: “He fired Comey because Comey would not, among other things, say that he wasn’t a target of the investigation...” Giuliani didn't mention who Comey wouldn't say that to but the article you linked clarifies that. As do Comey's own interviews.
Nonetheless, you and a lot of the media are spinning the Giuliani quote to say that Trump fired him because, and only because, Comey wouldn't stop investigating him. Which is blatantly false and, for most of the media that knows better, an outright lie.
That's certainly more accurate than you posted previously. Would be even more accurate if you said "Tell the media what you just told me or else I will fire you because of this and all the other things as well.""Tell the media you aren't investigating me or else I'll fire you"
-45
Everyone in the thread has read the quote and told you that you’re reading it wrong. I can’t help you if you persist in being stupid.
Talking to Congress creates an obligation to correct. Talking to the media has no such burden.Talking to the media creates an obligation to correct. Comey would have had to then inform the media when Trump began to be investigated. He would have been fired for that.
Put exactly that way, I think we can all agree.Can everybody at least just agree that the justice department and the FBI shouldn't act under the discretion of the president?
Wouldn't it be easier if you just didn't elect a criminal?Put exactly that way, I think we can all agree.
Can everybody at least just agree that the justice department and the FBI shouldn't act under the discretion of the president?
Now that's funny.Wouldn't it be easier if you just didn't elect a criminal?
Wouldn't it be easier if you just didn't elect a criminal?