fittingly, what followed was complete fictionOnce upon a time
fittingly, what followed was complete fictionOnce upon a time
He was impressive.That was a great rollout rally for Walz, positive vision and funny
She choosed Walz this morning and he gives ^^^^ this stump speech later the same day. However you want to slice or dice it, that was damn good.Ok not as bland as I thought.
I just read too that was all off the cuff, no teleprompterShe choosed Walz this morning and he gives ^^^^ this stump speech later the same day. However you want to slice or dice it, that was damn good.
She choosed Walz this morning
I can see Knights Classes the Bot and Adolf Shuckler beating off to this newsno wonder the retards here are falling all over themselves
I know you are not voting for Trump, so I am not applying this to you (just so we can avoid you telling me you aren't voting for Trump for the millionth time). If Republicans are going to run on stuff like this, they are going to lose. For one, people tend to vote based on the future, not the past. And Secondly, it's just going to remind everyone how crazy Trump's presidency was, even if that isn't the intent.This pick should be good for violence and crime in America
At least two people died during the violence in Minnesota’s Twin Cities, more than 600 arrests were made in the initial days of unrest, and the whole span of rioting and law enforcement response made it one of the most costly and destructive periods of civil unrestin US history. Minneapolis and Saint Paul sustained hundreds of millions of dollars in damage during those riots, and hundreds of buildings were heavily damaged.
Conservatives have charged Walz with essentially allowing rioters to “burn Minneapolis to the ground” and waffling on the deployment of National Guard troops to quell the violence.
Walz wasn’t the main authority in charge of responding to the unrest — that was the task of local officials, including Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey. But the task eventually passed to him once it was too much for local officials to handle. Both Walz and Frey’s governments have traded blame and presented their own versions of the events of those days of rage, but the full story of what happened is still not completely known.
I expect Trump to lose, but since the alternative is still not good enough for the American people IMO, I’m not voting. This way, when the country goes to holy hell. I’ll make sure I told you all, since I wasn’t a part of the voting process.I know you are not voting for Trump, so I am not applying this to you (just so we can avoid you telling me you aren't voting for Trump for the millionth time). If Republicans are going to run on stuff like this, they are going to lose. For one, people tend to vote based on the future, not the past. And Secondly, it's just going to remind everyone how crazy Trump's presidency was, even if that isn't the intent.
I don't care if you vote or not Mike, that wasn't the point of my post.I expect Trump to lose, but since the alternative is still not good enough for the American people IMO, I’m not voting. This way, when the country goes to holy hell. I’ll make sure I told you all, since I wasn’t a part of the voting process.
In a democracy, I also have the right not to vote. I’m not going to vote for someone with the sole purpose of just stopping the other candidate from winning.
I think that’s a silly Fox Newsy argument. The text above it explicitly states that the attachment is “without regard to the SEX of that person.” The whole bottom part that was crossed out was irrelevantly included in there, being that all they are talking about is the attachment based on the sex of that person, and nothing else.no wonder the retards here are falling all over themselves
You’re asking me questions about someone who I’m not voting for or care about. So.., what IS your point? The strategy?I don't care if you vote or not Mike, that wasn't the point or my post.
Ok.You’re asking me questions about someone who I’m not voting for or care about. So.., what IS your point? The strategy?
When has Trump ever had good strategy? He should have picked Haley as his VP. That alone was enough to drop him in the polls
We haven't even gotten to the DNC Convention yet (a sure-fire bump in the polls) and it's already crystal clear that the Republican ticket has no chance of winning the election.
But our board's "Not gonna vote for POTUS At All" Crowd apparently care enough to waste their time here bashing the Harris/Wals ticket. To borrow a Wals quote about Trump & Vance, 'that's weird as hell.'
But the cool thing about that strategy is that I can predict their post-election responses. They'll come here and give us another load of their bullsh*t: "I didn't give a sh*t about either of 'em anyways."
So.., how many Jews and minorities did you and your Nebraska buddies round up this morning after discussing the strategy over morning coffee at one of your “meetings?”We haven't even gotten to the DNC Convention yet (a sure-fire bump in the polls) and it's already crystal clear that the Republican ticket has no chance of winning the election.
But our board's "Not gonna vote for POTUS At All" Crowd apparently care enough to waste their time here bashing the Harris/Wals ticket. To borrow a Wals quote about Trump & Vance, 'that's weird as hell.'
But the cool thing about that strategy is that I can predict their post-election responses. They'll come here and give us another load of their bullsh*t: "I didn't give a sh*t about either of 'em anyways."
I love how you choosed italics to type your screeching.We haven't even gotten to the DNC Convention yet (a sure-fire bump in the polls) and it's already crystal clear that the Republican ticket has no chance of winning the election.
But our board's "Not gonna vote for POTUS At All" Crowd apparently care enough to waste their time here bashing the Harris/Wals ticket. To borrow a Wals quote about Trump & Vance, 'that's weird as hell.'
But the cool thing about that strategy is that I can predict their post-election responses. They'll come here and give us another load of their bullsh*t: "I didn't give a sh*t about either of 'em anyways."
I don't know what this means, but ok, good talk.Your lover loves your response
We do give a shit Adolf. We give a shit about how crappy the choices are. However, your Biden-like demented brain who thinks they are posting on a Nebraska board can’t even remember that was said about 100 times.They'll come here and give us another load of their bullsh*t: "I didn't give a sh*t about either of 'em anyways."
Adolf loves your posts.I don't know what this means, but ok, good talk.
I think we all would have more respect for you if you just simply said “ I would much rather vote for a pedophile enabler, than for Donald.“We haven't even gotten to the DNC Convention yet (a sure-fire bump in the polls) and it's already crystal clear that the Republican ticket has no chance of winning the election.
But our board's "Not gonna vote for POTUS At All" Crowd apparently care enough to waste their time here bashing the Harris/Wals ticket. To borrow a Wals quote about Trump & Vance, 'that's weird as hell.'
But the cool thing about that strategy is that I can predict their post-election responses. They'll come here and give us another load of their bullsh*t: "I didn't give a sh*t about either of 'em anyways."
Thanks, your intellectualism is shining through this morning for sure.Adolf loves your posts.
Adolf is looking for a side lover to replace his wife, since she’s so homely and manly anyway, he doesn’t care about gender. I’m just warning you.
Once again, the lever of intellect for the argument presented was at the appropriate level. How that you get it now.Thanks, your intellectualism is shining through this morning for sure.
Sure was, you did great Mike, thanks for putting me in my place.Once again, the lever of intellect for the argument presented was at the appropriate level. How that you get it now.
not well enough to have an opinion, unfortunatelyI think
says the guy who is basing his vote 100% on the fantasy that 2016-2020 was a dictatorship and that the last 4 years were a wonderful, booming economy.For one, people tend to vote based on the future, not the past
What? I am voting the way I am because I am a liberal. You think if Trump wasn't the candidate I would be voting for the Republican? Possible I guess depending on who it was and what they were running on, but I've never voted for a Republican in my life so highly doubtful.not well enough to have an opinion, unfortunately
says the guy who is basing his vote 100% on the fantasy that 2016-2020 was a dictatorship and that the last 4 years were a wonderful, booming economy.
normal people vote based on what they think won't have a tangible negative impact to their lives. idiots vote based on the wealth of propaganda they consume and the internet back-pats they receive for falling in line. they lack the courage to be disliked so they feign benevolence while begging for crumbs of pussy.
the positive/negative feedback dichotomy from faceless peers has become your religion. nobody believes that you're actually that passionate about Palestine, Ukraine, or whatever the latest virtue trend happens to be, but your conditioning has led you to believe that your only path to camaraderie and acceptance is through bleating the tired talking points fed to you (ironically) by billion dollar media and entertainment empires.
Glad you finally got it. If you’re looking for a response that you will love and agree with, maybe you join the board Kamalalovesya.com. I’m sure that you will find a bunch of your buddies in there that will satisfy your craving to agree with you fully including Adolf ShucklerSure was, you did great Mike, thanks for putting me in my place.
Hey, are you voting for Trump? You haven't told me in the last 5 minutes and I'm dumb as you like to point out, so I forgot.
FTFYWhat? I am voting the way I am because I am a liberal and the propaganda I consume reinforces my incentive to do so.
and Minnesota knows him more than anyone so if it is such a liability it would show there. The GOP expected Shapiro probably so are a little thrown off in how to attack him. the stolen valor bs won’t work either , he served 24 years and attained the rank of command sergeant major vs Vance working in a press office for a 4 year enlistment.I know you are not voting for Trump, so I am not applying this to you (just so we can avoid you telling me you aren't voting for Trump for the millionth time). If Republicans are going to run on stuff like this, they are going to lose. For one, people tend to vote based on the future, not the past. And Secondly, it's just going to remind everyone how crazy Trump's presidency was, even if that isn't the intent.
Let's see, I am voting for Democrats who currently have 4 governors who are Jewish (Republicans 0) 9 US Senators who are Jewish (Republicans 0), 21 reps who are Jewish (Republicans 2) a current sec of state who is Jewish, the current presidential nominee is married to a Jewish guy, and about 70% of Jews in this country vote for the same party I am. But I hate Jews?FTFY
We know politics is a team sport to you, because Trump is the most liberal Presidential Nominee with an (R) next to his name ever.
You're not equipped to have that conversation, though. You'd rather that war mongering, hating Jews, panicking about Russia, sucking up to corporations, slobbering over lifetime government officials, and children being mutilated become the bastion of liberal ideology.
What a hilarious full-circle your team has come since the days of protesting war and not trusting authority.