That was not what the bill did, It provided more money for processing those who came in. It was not about sealing off the border.
Kamala was considered to the left of Bernie Sanders. enough said.
2024 Election Thread
- Thread starter DaShuckster
- Start date
Kamala was considered to the left of Bernie Sanders. enough said.
Yes, it provided more money for processing. But apparently you missed the $20 billion dollars allocated to increase the number of border patrol agents and increase deportation flights.
Left of Bernie Sanders? Where'd you get THAT gem??!?
Smart move by them. Let the lingering debate picture be what we witnessed last month (despite the constant lying). He’s got nothing to gain by doing a Kamala debate. Though the odd attacking nature of the statement does indicate that they are feeling a little threatened.
Crickets.gif
I'm going to continue posting hilarious tweets until someone answers.
BINGO! They have Nothing. Nada. Zilch.
The best they can do is point to the border and pray we've all forgotten about the bill to beef up border security that Trump told his minions to kill.
Personal attacks will be our crew's go-to response from now through election day. They can't help themselves. They have to post something!
That border bill did little to seal the border, it was mostly tons of money to process those getting across.
Besides the obvious reasons (functioning economy, universal respect from world powers), because it makes you pedos and incels seethe
and frankly that’s more than enough reason on itself
> be @DaShuckster
> say something stupid
> “they’ll probably bully me now”
> gets bullied
> “look everyone! I got bullied”
what did he mean by this?
I said you were so brave! Why are you so triggered? Would you like for me to fly to Nebraska and give you a big hug?
13th time loser. What did the Biden administration do for over 3 years to fix the biggest border crisis in United States history?
Have you found any hobbies yet other than avoiding your mutt wife?
You don’t fly to Nebraska. You fly OVER AND PAST IT
Yep, our little ankle-biters don't want to touch that one with a ten-foot pole. Or 'educating' us about The Wall...or defending a convicted felon...or defending Trump's bromance with Putin.
Instead, they litter this election thread with insult...after insult...after insult...
I guess the rest of us will have to wait for some adults to post if we want to have any genuine election discussions.
—Ankle bitersYep, our little ankle-biters don't want to touch that one with a ten-foot pole. Or 'educating' us about The Wall...or defending a convicted felon...or defending Trump's bromance with Putin.
Instead, they litter this election thread with insult...after insult...after insult...
I guess the rest of us will have to wait for some adults to post if we want to have any genuine election discussions.
—reeeeeeee Insult after insult.
Funny how you won’t an answer @Ucfmikes question, but then turn around and bitch no one answers ninja’s.
Another two Ls for you.
When you’re trying to hold out just a bit longer on the wife or GF and not blow your baby batter, best to think of stuff to get your mind off it, like:
-baseball
-garbage
-aborted fetuses
-Shooky’s mutt
Works erratime.
You can NEVER HAVE A GENUINE ELECTION DISCUSSIONYep, our little ankle-biters don't want to touch that one with a ten-foot pole. Or 'educating' us about The Wall...or defending a convicted felon...or defending Trump's bromance with Putin.
Instead, they litter this election thread with insult...after insult...after insult...
I guess the rest of us will have to wait for some adults to post if we want to have any genuine election discussions.
Translation. I have no life and I’m yearning for some new posters that either see my position and become my besties or someone new who doesn’t agree with me that I can annoy the shit out of.
They tried for three years--but Trump kept stopping it from happening.
For the billionth time, we aren't voting for Trump. Hope this helps.
Yeah, and he’s an imbecile for picking this VP candidate. Ridiculous. Pick someone decent to run the country when he fukcs up if elected. The guy make ALL THE WRONG MOVES.
Should have picked Haley or someone like her. All the democrats have to do is play his soundbites of Vance and his Trump loathing.
Now, before the Retard Squad comes in and starts screeching that Haley is a sell-out blah blah blah, let's jog the mental rolodex to the 2020 debates when Kamala insinuated Joe Biden was racist. "You're not a racist, BUUUUUUTTTTTTT......"
FACT CHECK: Was Kamala Harris Ranked The Most Liberal Senator By GovTrack?
GovTrack ranked Harris as the most liberal senator in 2019.
checkyourfact.com
That fact is neither good nor bad, just the facts mam.
Last edited:
Oh cool, didn't realize you were the only person on this board. Super helpful post as always.
In all seriousness, because I don’t care to get involved in the pissing match in here… are you planning on voting for a 3rd party candidate or not voting at all? Just interested in where the people who are not voting for either candidate are going
Oh, I will vote--just not for POTUS. Tons of shit still on the ballot that is quite important...
Exactly. There is stuff that I’m very interested in voting for or against
Ah, I guess I missed the part where I was only talking to you and mikes. Oh nevermind, I wasn't.
Take the L and move on back to letting shuck live rent free in your head.
Neat. And yet again, I was only speaking for us. Little slower than usual for you today, I see.
And look who brought up Shooky. Not I.
Yet another L for you. At this point, it's just getting embarrassing für dich.
Yikes.
From the link you provided:
"Joshua Tauberer, founder of GovTrack, told Check Your Fact that GovTrack used to publish legislator “report cards” based on a single calendar year at the end of the first year of a two-year Congress.
“The statistic that Rep. Waltz is referring to was based on a single calendar year,” Tauberer said. “Several years ago we discontinued creating new single-calendar-year ‘report cards’: We determined that the limited data available in a single year was not sufficient to create a reliable portrait of the activity of legislators, particularly given the ebbs and flows of the legislative calendar, and therefore did not serve as a useful tool to our users and the American public.”
Just the facts, mam.
