And Democrats just 13 years ago -- "Against my religion" -- Obama, 2008
What about forcing a woman to have an abortion for stem cell research?
I’m not advocating horse paste. Just critiquing the effectiveness of your argument style and substance.
He just cannot understand Ivermectin has nothing to with vaccines.
I know ivermectin is not a vaccine shit for brains. I’ve only known about it for 21 years dipshit. It has not been proven to be effective consistently in studies to treat COVID successfully, so what should morons who believe in it do? Get vaccinated with an FDA approved vaccine
Critiquing what? Going all out on criticizing you murdererous imbeciles who trying to convince people to take ivermectin vs getting vaccinated. You’re not prescribing ivermectin, so what are you trying to accomplish with your “argument style and substance?”
But you cannot separate Ivermectin from anti-vaxxers, like a 3rd grader, hence ...
So this entire 'wrap up' from the US NIH of early 2021 studies and the CHANGE in advisement in late 2021 March was ... a lie?!
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
But what does that have to do with you being 100% WRONG about Ivermectin?!
You’re a raving lunatic murderer. People are not getting vaccinated because they think that they can get a prescription for ivermectin every time they test positive or get the sniffles. Try leaving your hut every once in a while
But you cannot separate Ivermectin from anti-vaxxers, like a 3rd grader, hence ...
So this entire 'wrap up' from the US NIH of early 2021 studies and the CHANGE in advisement in late 2021 March was ... a lie?!
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines - PubMed
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant...
Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
I know, still TL;DR ... so many references and authorities to read.
But what does that have to do with you being 100% WRONG about Ivermectin?!
You have continually posted so many things that are easily disproven with authoritative studies and advisements.
In February, the National Institutes of Health said there was insufficient evidence to rule for or against the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19. In March, a randomized study in the medical journal JAMA found that the drug did not speed up recovery from the disease. That same month, the FDApublished an explainer on why the drug should not be used to treat or prevent COVID-19.
Yeah, he has no interest in actually debating what we're saying.
That because of people like yourself, easily disproven with readily available regulatory information, that no one trusts you ... like a lot of politicians, as well as the US Media.
In February, the National Institutes of Health said there was insufficient evidence to rule for or against the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19. In March, a randomized study in the medical journal JAMA found that the drug did not speed up recovery from the disease. That same month, the FDApublished an explainer on why the drug should not be used to treat or prevent COVID-19.
You'll find plenty of people who want lockdowns and people staying completely indoors as well. Sigh ... fresh air actually reduces the spread people!
Guess his vaccine worked. Or it didn't work. I have no idea where the goalposts are anymore.
Sadly, our anti-vaxxer crew will look at this post and breathlessly say, "SEE?? Another BREAKTHROUGH case!!! We told you the vaccine is suspect!!!" while ignoring the fact that he got it from an unvaxxed moron who's apparently got it real bad.
Well, you would have to track down “
How many people actually believe this, though? This is a common liberal argument tactic to pin people to a strawman position and then argue as if everyone believes this. It is ironic that @Ucfmikes has resorted to only this tactic anymore. The truth is that most of the people in here have said that we need to stop demonizing the therapeutics and just blindly rage at everyone that hasn't gotten a vaccine regardless of the reasons they haven't gotten the vaccine. Some people simply cannot get that vaccine for legitimate health reasons. Some people are stubborn asses. It's life.
I hear it everyday that people are refusing the vaccines, but will take ivermectin in a minute. Maybe not Hydroxychloroquine, but ivermectin. You don’t hear this? Why do you think that there are warnings out about it. By the way, the percentage of people that can’t get vaccinated is very very low. This has already been discussed. Vaccines are THE ONLY WAY TO END THIS. Call that way of thinking bullish, but the whole world knows it outside of a vocal minority of idiots
A common liberal argument tactic? Jesus Christ, 85, Ucfmikes, and I AGREE on something and you call it a "lib" thing?
Blindly rage? Yeah, how DARE WE shake our heads in disgust at the numbskulls who are prolonging this pandemic for everybody.
Well, I give credit to Trump here: whoever they put in charge secured enough vaccines (from the 3 manufacturers) to vaccinate the whole country (330M people) at least twice with the 2 dosages. They didn't envision 100M people refusing to get the shots.
Have at it, hope it really works.Cholesterol drug reduces coronavirus infection by 70%, new study finds
A team of researchers is calling for clinical trials among hospitalized COVID-19 patients after finding that a drug used to treat cholesterol reduces coronavirus infection by 70% in lab studies, a new report findswww.click2houston.com
Another potential therapeutic.
Once again, any potential therapeutic is met with mockery. You guys are really weird about this.
Cholesterol drug reduces coronavirus infection by 70%, new study finds
A team of researchers is calling for clinical trials among hospitalized COVID-19 patients after finding that a drug used to treat cholesterol reduces coronavirus infection by 70% in lab studies, a new report finds
Another potential therapeutic.
Anecdotal or not, hcq, ivermectin, and even pepcid actually do make sense as treatments for covid and any other virus because they all raise the bodies PH level. How effective they are is in question, but at least there is a basis for why they might help.
