ADVERTISEMENT

Georgia Antivoting Law

Whether you think making people less comfortable to wait in a voting line will lead to decreased voter turnout (it will). I think we can all agree that there should be sufficient polling stations and processes in place where nobody is forced to wait for hours in line to cast a vote. Maybe an option to to get an advanced ballot (either pick up or by mail) that you fill out and then if voting in person all you need to do is the identity verification portion when you arrive rather than the time consuming process to fill out. Even if not everybody did this method it would decrease the demand for the booths and they would be able to get more people through more efficiently.
The bill adds voting machines and expands the amount of time people are allowed to vote. It doesn't eliminate no-excuse absentee voting, it just changes the verification from signature to the number on your driver's license or the last 4 digits of your ss#.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight_Light
And right now voter fraud is nearly 0% and turnout is only about 60%
B-B-But listen to @Nautiknight, there's a sense out there that's there's something wrong so there MUST be something to it, right? It couldn't be because Trump whined endlessly about it.
Because it’s constitutional and makes more sense?
There's a special brand of irony in defending the demotion of the election role of Georgia's Secretary of State because it's constitutional. :)
 
B-B-But listen to @Nautiknight, there's a sense out there that's there's something wrong so there MUST be something to it, right? It couldn't be because Trump whined endlessly about it.
There's a special brand of irony in defending the demotion of the election role of Georgia's Secretary of State because it's constitutional. :)
Stacy Abrams literally says that the only reason Kemp won is because he was the head of the states election board.
 
B-B-But listen to @Nautiknight, there's a sense out there that's there's something wrong so there MUST be something to it, right? It couldn't be because Trump whined endlessly about it.
There's a special brand of irony in defending the demotion of the election role of Georgia's Secretary of State because it's constitutional. :)
The constitution gives the power to decide the when and hows of voting to a state’s legislature. Secretary of State is not an elected position and shouldn’t have any say over voting. The guy in Georgia settled lawsuits last year that he had no right to. The move makes sense. There is no irony. Bureaucrats should not be involved in that process.
 
The constitution gives the power to decide the when and hows of voting to a state’s legislature. Secretary of State is not an elected position and shouldn’t have any say over voting. The guy in Georgia settled lawsuits last year that he had no right to. The move makes sense. There is no irony. Bureaucrats should not be involved in that process.
Secretary of state actually is an elected position
 
Secretary of state actually is an elected position
Heh. You’re right. Well then it is a strange change, unless it isn’t considered a position within the legislature. I thought it was appointed in GA. I like to prove myself a dummy on the internet. Keeps it fresh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crazyhole
Heh. You’re right. Well then it is a strange change, unless it isn’t considered a position within the legislature. I thought it was appointed in GA. I like to prove myself a dummy on the internet. Keeps it fresh.
I dont think it's strange at all. It makes sense to not have a guy in an elected office at the head of the election board. It's an unnecessary conflict of interest.
 
Democrats aren't happy creating an environment to lower election fraud. More needs to be done frankly across the country.
One of the more laughable complaints about this bill is that it requires election officials only to be part of the chain of custody on drop boxes. Why would anybody think that's a bad thing?
 
TDS everywhere. 🤣
Shuckster doesn't even know why he's against this bill, but he is and it must be because of Trump. We've also got FC mad about the fact that Georgia is making it easier for black people to vote but campaigns can't hand out water, so racism.
 
Voter fraud is at 0%. Riiight

Meanwhile libs what to make it as easy as possible to commit voter fraud since the base tends to be more unethical.
160 Million people voted. Can you show me even 160 instances of fraud? That would be 0.0001% fraud. The fraud we see is so irrelevant to the outcome that a little rain is probably 1000x more impactful to the election and turnout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hemightbejeremy
1. Get your ass kicked by black folks in an election.
2. Pass laws to disenfranchise black folks in the next election.
3. Cry when people call you racist, again.

Pretty simple.
 
No basis to that statement. Nobody wants limit black people from voting. I don't think extra verification is that big of a deal and frankly we should do more. Facial recognition against your ID is another we should use.
Georgia already requires ID for voting in person. Now they just require it for voting by mail. What's the big deal?
 
Georgia already requires ID for voting in person. Now they just require it for voting by mail. What's the big deal?

There isn't one. It is simply elites protecting themselves from the serfs they rule over. I need an ID to get passport, buy a gun, get vaccinated, vote in person, by alcohol if I look under the age of 30, The complaint is simply a red heron.
 
1. Get your ass kicked by black folks in an election.
2. Pass laws to disenfranchise black folks in the next election.
3. Cry when people call you racist, again.

Pretty simple.
Trump did better with black voters in 2020 than he did in 2016. He lost because his numbers with white voters were worse than 2016.

Not sure how that equates to “get your ass kicked by black folks in an election.”

Nice exhibition of racism by way of low expectations though.
 
Now y'all are trying to convince us that Republicans weren't severely screwed by black folks voting in Atlanta?

Republicans got screwed. Now they want to implement laws to help them not get screwed again, by disenfranchising black voters, the people who screwed them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OLearyLastCall
2048.jpg



"We love black people!" - Georgia
 
Trump did better with black voters in 2020 than he did in 2016. He lost because his numbers with white voters were worse than 2016.

Not sure how that equates to “get your ass kicked by black folks in an election.”

Nice exhibition of racism by way of low expectations though.

Instead of losing the Black vote 90-10, he lost like 85-15. So congrats to him. It all resulted in him losing the popular vote by 7 million votes. Somehow worse than when he lost the popular vote by a smidge under 3 million in 2016.

Biggest electoral loser since Hoover. No wonder voter suppression bills are all the rage.
 
Instead of losing the Black vote 90-10, he lost like 85-15. So congrats to him. It all resulted in him losing the popular vote by 7 million votes. Somehow worse than when he lost the popular vote by a smidge under 3 million in 2016.

Biggest electoral loser since Hoover. No wonder voter suppression bills are all the rage.
The only people who will be “suppressed” by these bills are people who can’t seem to find any time to cast a ballot during a 3 week early voting period, or don’t have any state issued ID and refuse to fill out ID verification paperwork.

Not a single one of these so-called “voter suppression” requirements is outside the norm of voting laws.

Despite the rhetoric of Democrats and civil rights groups, Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Charles Stewart said most of the law’s provisions are “fairly mild as these sorts of changes go.” And he said Georgia election laws won’t be outside the norm, especially compared with other Southern states.

“There may be some slight inconvenience to voters,” Stewart said. “But they don’t seem to be so insurmountable that they would throw elections one way or another in the future.”
 
Something has to exist first, in order to stop it. Just admit it, Republicans just want black people to shut up and get to the back of the bus.
 
The only people who will be “suppressed” by these bills are people who can’t seem to find any time to cast a ballot during a 3 week early voting period, or don’t have any state issued ID and refuse to fill out ID verification paperwork.

Not a single one of these so-called “voter suppression” requirements is outside the norm of voting laws.

Why should any voter be inconvenienced? Do you think there was massive voter fraud in 2020? Or are you Team Insurrection?
 
Why should any voter be inconvenienced? Do you think there was massive voter fraud in 2020? Or are you Team Insurrection?
Because security is more important than convenience. Especially when we’re still talking about nothing more than proving you are an eligible voter and making it more difficult to pull off fraud.

If some fraud could be proven, would that justify to you the slight changes that might “inconvenience” very small numbers of voters and actually disenfranchise nobody?
 
Because security is more important than convenience. Especially when we’re still talking about nothing more than proving you are an eligible voter and making it more difficult to pull off fraud.

If some fraud could be proven, would that justify to you the slight changes that might “inconvenience” very small numbers of voters and actually disenfranchise nobody?

Only enough fraud to actually matter in an election.

NONE has been proven on any major scale. Even Trump's DOJ agrees.

Do you consider the 2020 election results to be legitimate or are you on the side of insurrectionists?
 
I think everyone should have to prove they are who they say they are when voting. Period. End of subject. One fraudulent vote is too many. I also believe voting laws on the books should be followed. State legislatures are the only ones who are supposed to make such laws.
 
I’ve already stated my opinion on IDs, but if you want people to buy your message, suggesting its in response to massive voter fraud is NOT the way to go about it.
It's not my burden to justify why this bill is acceptable, it's the burden of those that oppose it to say why. If the reason is that it's suppression, this guy needs to state why he requires ID to fly on his planes and how that isn't a form of suppression. We are guaranteed the right of freedom of travel in the US, so he himself is guilty of what he's mad about.
 
It's not my burden to justify why this bill is acceptable, it's the burden of those that oppose it to say why. If the reason is that it's suppression, this guy needs to state why he requires ID to fly on his planes and how that isn't a form of suppression. We are guaranteed the right of freedom of travel in the US, so he himself is guilty of what he's mad about.
The TSA requires it. Racists.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT