ADVERTISEMENT

Hershel Walker: GOP Supporters? Really?

Lemme guess: You also 100% believed that that Swedish Penis Pump wasn't Austin Powers?

Typical "red herring" fallacy. Distract from the main point. You're not addressing my point.

There is no ironclad evidence, just circumstantial. You can't convict someone on circumstantial evidence. I know you're trying to be Mr. Funny Man, but again, is there a credit card number associated with the abortion? Did Herschel Walker put the clinic's name on the check, or did he write the check out to the bitter woman?

Enough with the corny ass jokes and answer the f--king question.
 
Typical "red herring" fallacy. Distract from the main point. You're not addressing my point.

There is no ironclad evidence, just circumstantial. You can't convict someone on circumstantial evidence. I know you're trying to be Mr. Funny Man, but again, is there a credit card number associated with the abortion? Did Herschel Walker put the clinic's name on the check, or did he write the check out to the bitter woman?

Enough with the corny ass jokes and answer the f--king question.
That's not a red herring. If you are going to come at me with logical fallacies then you better know what the definition of one actually is. You might want to put that one down for awhile.

You can't convict someone on circumstantial evidence? It happens all the time.

We are done here.
 
Typical "red herring" fallacy. Distract from the main point. You're not addressing my point.

There is no ironclad evidence, just circumstantial. You can't convict someone on circumstantial evidence. I know you're trying to be Mr. Funny Man, but again, is there a credit card number associated with the abortion? Did Herschel Walker put the clinic's name on the check, or did he write the check out to the bitter woman?

Enough with the corny ass jokes and answer the f--king question.

It isnt a trial, nothing he did in this case was illegal, so it doesnt matter if you could convict him or not. Hershel Walker has lied about numerous things, so when the lady has at least some evidence, I am not sure why you would give him the benefit of the doubt. I mean, his own child is calling him out and I am pretty sure he would know more about it than Republican talking heads or voters. Walker is basically everything Republicans have called out for years, an absentee father, has used abortion as birth control, history of domestic abuse, etc etc, yet for some reason, because he has an R by his name, that is all ok now. I have said many times on this board that Republicans dont stand for anything anymore, and the defense of Walker is proof of that.
 
Smoking gun please. Where's the coat hanger DNA? Where's the solid evidence?

Exactly my point. There is none.
I’m a Republican and voted for Trump twice. Elections aren’t ever foolproof or perfect, but Trump lost by too much to say it was rigged. Stop embarrassing Republicans and making this look like a cult following. The mail in votes killed him.
 
It isnt a trial, nothing he did in this case was illegal, so it doesnt matter if you could convict him or not. Hershel Walker has lied about numerous things, so when the lady has at least some evidence, I am not sure why you would give him the benefit of the doubt. I mean, his own child is calling him out and I am pretty sure he would know more about it than Republican talking heads or voters. Walker is basically everything Republicans have called out for years, an absentee father, has used abortion as birth control, history of domestic abuse, etc etc, yet for some reason, because he has an R by his name, that is all ok now. I have said many times on this board that Republicans dont stand for anything anymore, and the defense of Walker is proof of that.
That's Nazi thinking.
 
Na·zi | \ ˈnät-sē: a harshly domineering, dictatorial, or intolerant person

If this is really your view (which I am sure it isnt), then we should never be allowed to discuss any politicians personal issues. Sorry but this is dumb and is your way of actually avoiding the conversation. If Walker was a Democrat would you feel the same way? Of course you wouldnt.
 
So, let me get this straight: Jedi comes in here, uses words he doesn't understand, makes dumb arguments, gets his ass handed to him, and then turns around and calls someone a Nazi. You know, the very thing he and the rest of the low-IQ mouth-breathers REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE about when a stupid liberal calls someone a Nazi.

Bravo. You rotate day-old wieners at a Circle K for a living, no?
 
If this is really your view (which I am sure it isnt), then we should never be allowed to discuss any politicians personal issues. Sorry but this is dumb and is your way of actually avoiding the conversation. If Walker was a Democrat would you feel the same way? Of course you wouldnt.
This isn't "my view" ... it's Merriam Webster's view. Go look it up.
 
I could say that Knighttime Joe, DaFcukster, and Cubs79 have a weekly circle jerk while watching gay porn in the basement of Millican Hall ... but does that make it true? Maybe I'll forge a fake receipt while I'm at it.
 
Last edited:
This isn't "my view" ... it's Merriam Webster's view. Go look it up.

That definition has nothing to do with that I said. Again, if this is honestly what you think, then whenever you criticize a politician, then apparently you have to consider yourself a nazi.
 
I could say that Knighttime Joe, Da****ster, and Cubs79 have a weekly circle jerk while watching gay porn in the basement of Millican Hall ... but does that make it true? Maybe I'll forge a fake receipt while I'm at it.

So basically, you are a person who believes something is true if you want it to be true, but will say it isnt true if you dont want it to be true, even if there is evidence it is true. I will believe his own kids, but I am sure you know more about him than they do, so you do you.
 
So basically, you are a person who believes something is true if you want it to be true, but will say it isnt true if you dont want it to be true, even if there is evidence it is true. I will believe his own kids, but I am sure you know more about him than they do, so you do you.
Huh, weird, almost like I was exactly right: he is in a cult and you can not reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT