What "evidence" did the grand jury get to see? I understand they heard testimony from one of the neighbors supported police assertions that they announced themselves prior to forcibly entering the apartment. What about the testimony of the other 11 residents? What about the testimony of Breanna's boyfriend who they busted in on? What about the follow-up testimony of their lone neighbor witness?
Why are they claiming they knocked on Breanna's door and announced themselves when they had a 'no knock' warrant? And if they had decided prior to the raid -- as they now claim -- to announce themselves despite a 'no knock' warrant, why do it in the middle of the night??!?
Did the grand jury get to see the police-cam videos in their entirety? If not, why not?
As I said before, because of the way this raid played out, the cover-up is protecting butts much higher up the chain than the officers involved that night. If there was ever a case that literally cried out for an external, FBI review, it's this one. Thank goodness, they are.