Kavanaugh Vote Now in Jeopardy
- Thread starter DaShuckster
- Start date
- Status
Well then Kavanaugh is shook. Lol
You're going to need medical intervention when he's confirmed. The Shook will be out of control.
Margot Cleveland ran an epic Twitter thread on documenting the many, many times that Ford completely changed parts of her story during testimony. Summary as follows. No wonder the seasoned prosecutor wrote a memo stating that there's absolutely nothing credible in this allegation.
20/ Ford change: Year of party (mid-80s to 1982); Her age (late teens to 15); Number of people at party; location of party; and layout of the interior of the party. AND each change came when the story didn't make sense OR was able to be disproven. END. pic.twitter.com/jHC66jXHKt
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) September 30, 2018
20/ Ford change: Year of party (mid-80s to 1982); Her age (late teens to 15); Number of people at party; location of party; and layout of the interior of the party. AND each change came when the story didn't make sense OR was able to be disproven. END. pic.twitter.com/jHC66jXHKt
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) September 30, 2018
That just tells me you are fairly young. It was a term used in the early 80's.
Like I said early on in this thread, they are both liars.
Then you agree that neither one should serve on the supreme court after committing obvious perjury and misleading the Senate while under oath.
Sure, now that we have the internet and urban dictionary. 37 years ago we had neither. Terms were regional and local and there was no consistency from place to place. Unlike now, most kids then weren’t readily exposed to porn on the internet. You can’t apply today’s common knowledge to the early (or was it mid) 80’s.
I’ve read people that grew up in MD around the same time and they said everyone knew that boof meant fart. As for Devil’s Triangle, a bunch of kids could’ve made any game with that name. Who’s to say they didn’t have a drinking game called that. I’d never even heard Devil’s Triangle as a MMF threesome until you guys decided there is one meaning for that only because it fits your narrative.
You bump the thread to share this gem you probably lifted from the comment section of conservative tree house? Get a grip your life is spiraling out of control.
Both? Kavanaugh is the nominee undergoing a political shitshow. Yes, I want him confirmed simply because the dems are doing everything they can to block him. Even without all these polically motivated accusations, he wouldn't have been acceptable.
I can agree with that. I didn't know what a Devil's Triangle was until I read about it in this forum and that was within the past few years.
Fits "your narrative"? What is my narrative by the way?
![[thumb2]](https://ct.yimg.com/mr/uploads/891/1684387.png "Thumbs Up 2 [thumb2]")
Do you mind if I ask how old you are? Not to put you down but I’m just wondering what cultural phenomena you grew up with.
So we’re not far apart in age then. I don’t know what to say other than we’ve fallen into quite the cynical age now. Also, I guess you’re just going to ignore Feinstein’s delay in bringing this forward while you post all kinds of anti-Republican stuff.39. I was here during the Culpepper years.
That cartoon is both wrong and offensive.
39. I was here during the Culpepper years.
Figures the latest disgusting partisan hack to show up here would share such a vile cartoon. At least I know where your ignorant mind goes for its “information”.
Low class imbecile
Seriously? You're missing the donkey on at least one arm there. It's amazing how you're complaining about attitudes that are exactly the same attitudes you're pushing yourself. You're completely unobjective.39. I was here during the Culpepper years.
Oh, did you hear Kavanaugh threw ice at a friend at a bar in '85?!
And he -- gasp -- got a 'tip' about the New Yorker article and text'd some classmates he still knew!
I suppose that makes him guilty there too?!
I.e., if I'm the FBI, I'm not going to entertain texts sent in 2018 if they are just asking for witnesses to merely collaborate 'a side.'
Both sides are doing that ... but we only care about Kavanaugh's attempts, even though he's trying not to be 'blindsided' by new accusations.
I can totally understand why he'd text old classmates ... I would too! And use my lawyers to do so as well, as well as their PIs, once tapped and involved!
This Swetnick woman went on NBC and NBC ended up having to basically apologize for running her interview and stated that they corroborated absolutely nothing. This is yet another woman that lefties here jumped to believe full stop before knowing anything whatsoever.
In summary:
Finally, Swetnick is asked for the names of anyone who can back up her story. She apparently gave NBC four names. One of the four told NBC they don’t know Jule Swetnick, one was deceased, and the last two didn’t respond.
In summary:
Finally, Swetnick is asked for the names of anyone who can back up her story. She apparently gave NBC four names. One of the four told NBC they don’t know Jule Swetnick, one was deceased, and the last two didn’t respond.
Example #100000001 of why you should never get your news or analysis from 85.
You failed to mention the part about him lying under oath after the texting of the old classmates. Would you have done that too?
Something that hasn't gotten enough attention as the Senate waits for the completion of the FBI investigation is Kavanaugh's demeanor. His behavior in front of the Judicial Committee last week was weird, rude and, in many cases, very disrespectful. How anybody in their right mind could consider him an "impartial" judge after that performance is beyond me.
It underlies one of the biggest issues with our SCOTUS: ENTITLEMENT. Right or Left, the court is made up of pampered, elitist Ivy leaguers. This was only reinforced by Kavanaugh's "How DARE you question me?" tone last week. We're supposed to look at his Yale Law degree and assume he "worked damn hard" for what he got. But so do a lot of other good lawyers who didn't have the good fortune of rich parents with Yale connections. Hell, Kavanaugh's private "preppy" high school has its own golf course for crying out loud.
Yeah, when he's confirmed he'll truly be a "Man of the People" on the High Court, right guys?
It underlies one of the biggest issues with our SCOTUS: ENTITLEMENT. Right or Left, the court is made up of pampered, elitist Ivy leaguers. This was only reinforced by Kavanaugh's "How DARE you question me?" tone last week. We're supposed to look at his Yale Law degree and assume he "worked damn hard" for what he got. But so do a lot of other good lawyers who didn't have the good fortune of rich parents with Yale connections. Hell, Kavanaugh's private "preppy" high school has its own golf course for crying out loud.
Yeah, when he's confirmed he'll truly be a "Man of the People" on the High Court, right guys?
I’ll give you that one but have we seen the texts yet? And it wasn’t lying about the texts but was the question of when he learned of the Ramirez allegation. The texts are supposedly before the New Yorker article. Still, with the way the media misrepresents everything, I’d like to see the texts.
You can substitute Washington DC for the SCOTUS above and you’d be much more accurate. It’s really starting to look like the people who’ve been warning of an elites vs normals system where the small ideological differences we have are blown out of proportion to keep us divided and ignorant of the real threats to liberty and freedom may have a little more credibility than we gave them credit for. The elites you’re describing filter among federal government and think tanks and non-profits depending on who wins the elections. The new trend there is that the media has jumped into the merry-go-round; largely on the Democrat side.
To another of your points, you’d have a much better claim to degrade him as a legacy to Yale if he wasn’t in the top 3 of his class, if he didnt earn some of the most competitive clerkships in DC, and if he didn’t go on to have a distinguished 30 year career at many levels. This isn’t dubya we’re talking about; Kavanaugh actually earned his way there, legacy and money or no.
Yes, he went on for a bit how about incredibly hard he worked and swore under oath that he had no connections at all. He made it seem like his family/friends had no history with Yale, but that wasn’t true either. His very own grandfather went to Yale. The heck is wrong with this guy? Why did he mislead and lie so consistently?
He just randomly brought it up in his own and painted himself as some random hard working kid who busted his butt to get into Yale. Went out of his way to say/imply that he had no connections and wasn’t a legacy.
If he got in on his own works then what is wrong with his statement ? Not being confrontational just asking . This is nit picking bs in my opinion
The purpose of the hearing and swearing under oath was to help people hear the full truth with no spin and there’s a guy who’s lying and misleading every other minute. It’s a bad look for someone trying to convince everyone that he’s a great, honorable, honest guy who’d the best person in the country to be on the Supreme Court.
Last edited:
You've picked out 2 or 3 things from an hours-long testimony and interview and you're saying "every other minute." Stop misrepresenting what happened.
- Status
Similar threads
