That was prior to the parties flipping, nice try.
That was prior to the parties flipping, nice try.
And you might just be stupid enough to swallow the media fabricated faux outrage that it's all about the gays.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
The sad thing is, you might be dumb enough to actually believe that.Originally posted by fabknight:
WTF are you talking about? That's not what this is about, doofus; it's about freedom of religion. This isn't about serving or not serving gay folks.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
The incredible hypocrisy of the christian religion is just mind numbing. I can totally see Jesus refusing to serve someone because they are gay, just like he refused to hang out with prostitutes because of their sins.
You people defending this are pathetic.
Please, explain exactly what its all about. And if you say something retarded like "freedom of religion" we will all know that means "freedom to be a dick and not serve the gays exactly UNLIKE Christ" and that you are butthole stupid.Originally posted by fabknight:
And you might just be stupid enough to swallow the media fabricated faux outrage that it's all about the gays.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
The sad thing is, you might be dumb enough to actually believe that.Originally posted by fabknight:
WTF are you talking about? That's not what this is about, doofus; it's about freedom of religion. This isn't about serving or not serving gay folks.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
The incredible hypocrisy of the christian religion is just mind numbing. I can totally see Jesus refusing to serve someone because they are gay, just like he refused to hang out with prostitutes because of their sins.
You people defending this are pathetic.
I'll admit the law isn't perfect, as I do not believe the government should be in the business of telling people what to do, however using "religious freedom" as a catch all is even worse. Especially when people like you can't even follow your own religion, and just make up dogma as you go along in order to carry out your pathetic bigoted beliefs.Originally posted by fabknight:
Regardless of their dogma, churches and other religious organizations should be forced to offer their products and services to everyone equally.
So as long as its done somewhere else, we can't be mad about it being done in the US? It's Tim Cook by the way.Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
I wonder if the people hyperventilating over this law realize that the legislature and the Governor are going to insert a clause specifically protecting against gay discrimination to make it crystal clear that's not the intent of the law? If these guys were so intent on letting people hate on gays, as the entire left wing would have you believe, wouldn't they be a lot more reluctant to alter the law this quickly?
Maybe it was a poorly written law but the notion that it was written specifically to target gays is just f*cking ridiculous.
PS- wonder how many people realize that while Steve Jobs was grand standing about not doing business in Indiana, over this, his company currently sells in Uganda, Congo, and Saudi Arabia? Places like Uganda where the law specifically allows for execution of gay people?
Yea, no problem there I guess, as long as I get my iPhone! A poorly written law in Indiana is cause for OUTRAGE!, yet collecting sales in places where homosexuality is a crime punishable by death is cool!
I wonder if that's being flagged as a massive, incredible bit of hypocrisy, or if the liberals in hysterics really are making the point that Indiana, is in fact, worse than Uganda for gay people.
I understand what you are saying and there is some truth to it.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
I'll admit the law isn't perfect, as I do not believe the government should be in the business of telling people what to do, however using "religious freedom" as a catch all is even worse. Especially when people like you can't even follow your own religion, and just make up dogma as you go along in order to carry out your pathetic bigoted beliefs.Originally posted by fabknight:
Regardless of their dogma, churches and other religious organizations should be forced to offer their products and services to everyone equally.
Where are all the cake stores refusing business to 2nd, 3rd, 4th marriages? Because unlike homosexual marriage, Jesus actually said something about that being a sin:
9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery." -Matthew 19
![]()
First, I just watched the horrible movie on Steve Jobs, so had him on the brain.Originally posted by MACHater02:
So as long as its done somewhere else, we can't be mad about it being done in the US? It's Tim Cook by the way.Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
I wonder if the people hyperventilating over this law realize that the legislature and the Governor are going to insert a clause specifically protecting against gay discrimination to make it crystal clear that's not the intent of the law? If these guys were so intent on letting people hate on gays, as the entire left wing would have you believe, wouldn't they be a lot more reluctant to alter the law this quickly?
Maybe it was a poorly written law but the notion that it was written specifically to target gays is just f*cking ridiculous.
PS- wonder how many people realize that while Steve Jobs was grand standing about not doing business in Indiana, over this, his company currently sells in Uganda, Congo, and Saudi Arabia? Places like Uganda where the law specifically allows for execution of gay people?
Yea, no problem there I guess, as long as I get my iPhone! A poorly written law in Indiana is cause for OUTRAGE!, yet collecting sales in places where homosexuality is a crime punishable by death is cool!
I wonder if that's being flagged as a massive, incredible bit of hypocrisy, or if the liberals in hysterics really are making the point that Indiana, is in fact, worse than Uganda for gay people.
Your posts have really gone downhill, try not to sound so much like a not quite as ancient, but still retarded goodknightfl.
Please tell me you aren't this dense. You probably are, but I want to hold out some hope.Originally posted by Bob the Knight:
Discrimination against gays = bigot
Discrimination against religious people = perfectly OK
Posted from Rivals Mobile
So do you attack and belittle everyone you meet equally, or only people with religious views?Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
Fab, just because I don't believe in a butthole stupid story fabricated by camel humping desert nomads thousands of years ago, doesn't mean I don't have a set of beliefs. Yet another time you are wrong. I believe in treating everyone equally.
Pot, meet kettle.Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
So do you attack and belittle everyone you meet equally, or only people with religious views?Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
Fab, just because I don't believe in a butthole stupid story fabricated by camel humping desert nomads thousands of years ago, doesn't mean I don't have a set of beliefs. Yet another time you are wrong. I believe in treating everyone equally.
Yea, then you don't treat people equally. You search out people who have views you don't agree with and belittle them. That is, by definition, not treating people equally.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
Pot, meet kettle.Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
So do you attack and belittle everyone you meet equally, or only people with religious views?Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
Fab, just because I don't believe in a butthole stupid story fabricated by camel humping desert nomads thousands of years ago, doesn't mean I don't have a set of beliefs. Yet another time you are wrong. I believe in treating everyone equally.
And I attack and belittle everyone who has stupid beliefs, so mostly the latter but there is plenty to go around, especially given the current republican leadership.
so explain what the law is there for...Originally posted by fabknight:
And you might just be stupid enough to swallow the media fabricated faux outrage that it's all about the gays.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
The sad thing is, you might be dumb enough to actually believe that.Originally posted by fabknight:
WTF are you talking about? That's not what this is about, doofus; it's about freedom of religion. This isn't about serving or not serving gay folks.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
The incredible hypocrisy of the christian religion is just mind numbing. I can totally see Jesus refusing to serve someone because they are gay, just like he refused to hang out with prostitutes because of their sins.
You people defending this are pathetic.
Are you really dumb enough to think there is a politician in this world that would take on the catholic church to make them marry a gay couple in their church?Originally posted by fabknight:
Regardless
of their dogma, churches and other religious organizations should be
forced to offer their products and services to everyone equally.
I disagree, I treat everyone fairly until they do something stupid to give me a reason not to (such a bobknight thinking that discriminating against gays is the exact same thing as discriminating against people who discriminate against gays). Then I make fun of them.Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Yea, then you don't treat people equally. You search out people who have views you don't agree with and belittle them. That is, by definition, not treating people equally.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
Pot, meet kettle.Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
So do you attack and belittle everyone you meet equally, or only people with religious views?Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
Fab, just because I don't believe in a butthole stupid story fabricated by camel humping desert nomads thousands of years ago, doesn't mean I don't have a set of beliefs. Yet another time you are wrong. I believe in treating everyone equally.
And I attack and belittle everyone who has stupid beliefs, so mostly the latter but there is plenty to go around, especially given the current republican leadership.
I'm not even offended by you doing so, I'd just like to point out that your assertion that you treat everyone equally is incorrect.
so explain what the law is there for...Haven't you heard, it's all about "religious freedom". Fab still can't provide an example of this that doesn't include not serving gays. But trust him, "religious freedom" shall not be infringed![/QUOTE]Originally posted by fabknight:
And you might just be stupid enough to swallow the media fabricated faux outrage that it's all about the gays.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
The sad thing is, you might be dumb enough to actually believe that.Originally posted by fabknight:
WTF are you talking about? That's not what this is about, doofus; it's about freedom of religion. This isn't about serving or not serving gay folks.Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
The incredible hypocrisy of the christian religion is just mind numbing. I can totally see Jesus refusing to serve someone because they are gay, just like he refused to hang out with prostitutes because of their sins.
You people defending this are pathetic.
You make "discriminate" sound like a terrible thing. I personally have discriminating tastes in all things. We all discriminate... Discriminate defined - "recognize a distinction; differentiate"Originally posted by UCFRogerz:
I'm still trying to figure out who the dense one is. The one actively discriminating against religious beliefs or the ones that discriminate because of religious beliefs.
so you are honestly worried about the government coming to the catholic church and saying you must marry a gay couple in your church?Originally posted by fabknight:
Slippery slope, boys, slippery slope. Government only gets bigger and laws more restricting. It just happens that "gay rights" are the cause de jour...jump on the media bandwagon everyone! It's fun!!
Just a side note:Originally posted by NinjaKnight:
The incredible hypocrisy of the christian religion is just mind numbing. I can totally see Jesus refusing to serve someone because they are gay, just like he refused to hang out with prostitutes because of their sins.
You people defending this are pathetic.
Not at this particular time, no. Conversely, are you saying that it's forever impossible?Originally posted by Dmarino110:
so you are honestly worried about the government coming to the catholic church and saying you must marry a gay couple in your church?Originally posted by fabknight:
Slippery slope, boys, slippery slope. Government only gets bigger and laws more restricting. It just happens that "gay rights" are the cause de jour...jump on the media bandwagon everyone! It's fun!!
but that is the reason you are defending the law...Originally posted by fabknight:
Not at this particular time, no. Conversely, are you saying that it's forever impossible?Originally posted by Dmarino110:
so you are honestly worried about the government coming to the catholic church and saying you must marry a gay couple in your church?Originally posted by fabknight:
Slippery slope, boys, slippery slope. Government only gets bigger and laws more restricting. It just happens that "gay rights" are the cause de jour...jump on the media bandwagon everyone! It's fun!!
Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Maybe it was a poorly written law but the notion that it was written specifically to target gays is just f*cking ridiculous.
Lulz! OMg! LOL! Really!?Originally posted by chemmie:
Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Maybe it was a poorly written law but the notion that it was written specifically to target gays is just f*cking ridiculous.![]()
LOL.
Really?
You really just wrote that?
then what was the purpose? are there really people worried the USA is about to adopt an official religion?Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Lulz! OMg! LOL! Really!?Originally posted by chemmie:
Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Maybe it was a poorly written law but the notion that it was written specifically to target gays is just f*cking ridiculous.![]()
LOL.
Really?
You really just wrote that?
Of course you believe they did. You're an ignorant doofus.
Wow.Originally posted by chemmie:
Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Maybe it was a poorly written law but the notion that it was written specifically to target gays is just f*cking ridiculous.![]()
LOL.
Really?
You really just wrote that?
Originally posted by UCFRogerz:
Here's a tip. If you want to discriminate against someone, go ahead. Just don't tell anybody.
You can refuse service, fire someone, etc for whatever reason you want. Just don't say it was because of the gay or their color or creed.
Wow. I wasn't too surprised that bob couldn't tell the difference, but this is surprising.Originally posted by UCFRogerz:
I'm still trying to figure out who the dense one is. The one actively discriminating against religious beliefs or the ones that discriminate because of religious beliefs.
Until a pattern is established, I suppose you'd be okay.Originally posted by UCFRogerz:
Here's a tip. If you want to discriminate against someone, go ahead. Just don't tell anybody.
You can refuse service, fire someone, etc for whatever reason you want. Just don't say it was because of the gay or their color or creed.
Or just be a crotchety old man and deny service to everyone.Originally posted by fabknight:
Until a pattern is established, I suppose you'd be okay.Originally posted by UCFRogerz:
Here's a tip. If you want to discriminate against someone, go ahead. Just don't tell anybody.
You can refuse service, fire someone, etc for whatever reason you want. Just don't say it was because of the gay or their color or creed.
Yea the governor wouldnt answer a yes/no question on national television on whether or not he legalized discrimination, specifically when considering gays....but he TOTALLY wasnt targeting gays, ya guys.Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Lulz! OMg! LOL! Really!?Originally posted by chemmie:
Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Maybe it was a poorly written law but the notion that it was written specifically to target gays is just f*cking ridiculous.![]()
LOL.
Really?
You really just wrote that?
Of course you believe they did. You're an ignorant doofus.