In his own case. Nothing to see here...
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/...-tampering.html#click=https://t.co/JCKoonLPiW
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/...-tampering.html#click=https://t.co/JCKoonLPiW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Manafort is a scumbag and deserves to go to prison. How does this relate to Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election again?
Well, you yawned so I figured I’d respond in the same vein.Ah, going with the Fox News Bob tactic of pretending to be a moron.
Boldmovecotton.jpg
Well, you yawned so I figured I’d respond in the same vein.
#winning#canttouchthis
wall construction recently began in san diego ;-)MSM D v R drivel. Bigly yawn folks believe me.
Just build the wall & end chain migration.
Maybe its just giving us a glaring insight into how bad politics has become, where people go to great lengths to use the power of government for self-enrichment.
He certainly didn’t use the vetting process very wellThe prosecutors said that this isnt related to the Trump campaign, so theres that.
The bigger issue to me is that this is all starting to look an awful lot like the Teapot Dome scandal. How many corrupt people can Trump surround himself with before it comes back on him? Maybe its just giving us a glaring insight into how bad politics has become, where people go to great lengths to use the power of government for self-enrichment. Personally I dont think Trump himself is working that same angle but you have to question his judgment on who to trust.
In his own case. Nothing to see here...
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/...-tampering.html#click=https://t.co/JCKoonLPiW
I hope you realize that nobody in Trump's corner cares if Manafort gets hung out to dry. They really don't.
.
Also, if you had "FBI spies" inside the Clinton Foundation and then spent tens of millions with a special prosecutor that had unfettered access and subpoena power, do you think they would have found any nefarious activity between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department? Of course they would have. It's not a surprise.
If you put a team of investigators around any Presidential candidate and give them carte blanche to pull all records and look for anything at all and you'll find plenty of process crimes. Add in that Mueller, rather than quietly going about his business, is using the media to apply pressure on people and sway the popular opinion in his direction and it's easy to understand why you are getting this feeling. That is the intent from both the investigators and the media.The prosecutors said that this isnt related to the Trump campaign, so theres that.
The bigger issue to me is that this is all starting to look an awful lot like the Teapot Dome scandal. How many corrupt people can Trump surround himself with before it comes back on him? Maybe its just giving us a glaring insight into how bad politics has become, where people go to great lengths to use the power of government for self-enrichment. Personally I dont think Trump himself is working that same angle but you have to question his judgment on who to trust.
It's not that we don't care that he gets hung out to dry. The guy seems dirty and we want dirty people prosecuted. That goes without saying. It's that Manafort's crimes have nothing to do with Trump.And that is exactly what is the problem with you trump nut huggers. You SHOULD care. But you don't. You care more about asinine kneeling during the national anthem. Played like a fiddle comes to mind.
So Peters doesn’t know if it’s true, but he feels like it may be because that’s the way Russians work and He thinks Trump’s weaknesses play into their strengths and oh by the way Trump hasn’t done anything overt against Russia. That’s an opinion with a ton of logic issues. In no way does he present any actual evidence nor any facts actually demonstrating a collusive link between the two.
So Peters doesn’t know if it’s true, but he feels like it may be because that’s the way Russians work and He thinks Trump’s weaknesses play into their strengths and oh by the way Trump hasn’t done anything overt against Russia. That’s an opinion with a ton of logic issues. In no way does he present any actual evidence nor any facts actually demonstrating a collusive link between the two.
When the media runs a story and cites “sources close to the investigation” that is a planned leak. Or at least it was for decades. But it’s a fact that the dossier’s veracity has not been proven and, in fact, some of the allegations in it have been disputed. It’s a fact that Comey leaked the memo that he wrote about conversations with the President through a friend who then leaked to the media. Comey admitted this so it isn’t conjecture. Comey admitted that he leaked it to spur on the call for a Special Investigator. That’s a fact. I did throw in opinion but it wasn’t 100% conjecture.You just basically described all of your above posts regarding the Mueller investigation. Lots of conjecture. Zero facts to back up that Mueller is working with the media.
I’m still waiting for hard proof from yesterday.
But I won’t hold my breath because I know Mueller doesn’t give a rats ass about what the dumbass talking pundits on either side are saying. He doesn’t care about what the American people as a whole think either because he doesn’t have to make his report public to them. He’s going to do his job, broad scope and all, and report his findings to Rosenstein.
When the media runs a story and cites “sources close to the investigation” that is a planned leak. Or at least it was for decades. But it’s a fact that the dossier’s veracity has not been proven and, in fact, some of the allegations in it have been disputed. It’s a fact that Comey leaked the memo that he wrote about conversations with the President through a friend who then leaked to the media. Comey admitted this so it isn’t conjecture. Comey admitted that he leaked it to spur on the call for a Special Investigator. That’s a fact. I did throw in opinion but it wasn’t 100% conjecture.
Ah, ok. Then yes, my conjecture is similar. But I don't think all of the information from Mueller has not been from Trump, just the latest stuff and more since Giuliani joined the team.I didn’t bring up the dossier and I didn’t bring up Comey. I’m only referring to your claims regarding Mueller working with or leaking to the media. I’m yet to see proof of it.
And “sources close to the investigation” means nothing. That could just as easily mean some staffer at the White House over heard a convo between Trump’s lawyers and the Mueller team and ran to the media. Most of what we know about the investigation comes from the spin Trump and his lawyers are trying to put on it.
HOOOOORAAAAAY!!!!
another political thread!!!
Instead of wasting time trying trying to convince someone who will never change their opinions, we should be worried about Chemmie's mental state. He admits that he has gone off his anti-depressants. Frankly, I'm worried for the Fatty.
Be best. This isn't best.HOOOOORAAAAAY!!!!
another political thread!!!
Instead of wasting time trying trying to convince someone who will never change their opinions, we should be worried about Chemmie's mental state. He admits that he has gone off his anti-depressants. Frankly, I'm worried for the Fatty.
Sadly you are correct. My troll game is off since I am so distraught and worried about the Chemster.This isn't best.
Pardons are coming anyway ... so who cares.
If you don't see something wrong with this, you are an idiot.
Obama pardoned Chelsea Manning .... a traitor. Clinton pardoned Marc Rich who was a huge Clinton donor and was making millions selling oil to Iran while Iran was holding US hostages....
I'm sure you were equally horrified about those .... unless you are an idiot?
Makes sense that Newt would say that. Manafort was establishment. Which is part of the reason he only worked on the Trump campaign for 144 days. Trump hated the direction Manafort was going with it and fired him. So I’m thinking Newt was full of crap back then.
Those pardons aren't intended to obstruct justice in an investigation into those presidents.Obama pardoned Chelsea Manning .... a traitor. Clinton pardoned Marc Rich who was a huge Clinton donor and was making millions selling oil to Iran while Iran was holding US hostages....
I'm sure you were equally horrified about those .... unless you are an idiot?
Yeah, actually I am 100% against both of those. You see, it's crazy but some people are able to think for themselves and not mindlessly support what their party tells them to.