ADVERTISEMENT

Mueller Report Has Been Filed UPDATE: 10 cases of obstruction of justice referred to Congress.

Actually those of us without TDS knew that stuff was going on from day 1. It's no shocker that Russia was trying to influence our election and that they have spies here.
You thinking it was happening is a lot different than the government having Intel on what is happening and law makers having a report on what is happening.
 
dems have known nothing was going to be found for a very long time.

Really? The Muehler Report was just released. Is Pelosi psychic?

pelosi knew this and conceded last week. thats why they dropped this on a friday afternoon hoping it would blow over.
Sorry to fact check you when you're on such a roll but Congress hasn't had a damn thing to do with the report (yet.) The decision on the report's release was made by Muehler with, I'm assuming, some input from Attorney General Barr.

so many people shook. if only i could collect all the tears people on this board shed this weekend. tds shook so many people to the core that they stopped thinking rationally.

This is my first take on the issue since the submission of the Report and the public release of Barr's 'summary,' so let me give you my "irrational, tds-shook" thoughts:

1) No one outside of the WH and the Special Council's office has seen the Muehler report and reviewed any of the evidence that he and his team collected. Muehler tried to play impartial referee and indicated that he had evidence "on both sides" regarding the obstruction of justice issue. However, what we got Sunday was Trump's hand-picked AG's take on it.

2) But why did the AG issue his reaction in the first place (other than for political motives)? Like all the special council reports of the past on Nixon and Clinton, it's Congress, not the AG, that plays judge and jury.

3) Everyone is in agreement that a sitting President couldn't be indicted by Muehler--or the AG for that matter. The only ones who can do that is Congress. Similar to what happened with Ken Starr with his Starr Report, he provides the evidence and its up to Congress to act, or not act.

4) Trump won the weekend because the White House was able to put its own political spin on the document before anyone else even had a chance to see it. The actual report may well justify Barr's assessment but who knows? There are many aspects of Barr's letter that raises some eyebrows about his impartiality.

5) I don't know where this is headed but I think we can all safely assume that Barr's opinion this past weekend is far from the end of it.
 
Last edited:
Really? The Muehler Report was just released. Is Pelosi psychic?


Sorry to fact check you when you're on such a roll but Congress hasn't had a damn thing to do with the report (yet.) The decision on the report's release was made by Muehler with, I'm assuming, some input from Attorney General Barr.



This is my first take on the issue since the submission of the Report and the public release of Barr's 'summary,' so let me give you my "irrational, tds-shook" thoughts:

1) No one outside of the WH and the Special Council's office has seen the Muehler report and reviewed any of the evidence that he and his team collected. Muehler tried to play impartial referee and indicated that he had evidence "on both sides" regarding the obstruction of justice issue. However, what we got Sunday was Trump's hand-picked AG's take on it.

2) But why did the AG issue his reaction in the first place (other than for political motives)? Like all the special council reports of the past on Nixon and Clinton, it's Congress, not the AG, that plays judge and jury.

3) Everyone is in agreement that a sitting President couldn't be indicted by Muehler--or the AG for that matter. The only ones who can do that is Congress. Similar to what happened with Ken Starr with his Starr Report, he provides the evidence and its up to Congress to act, or not act.

3) Trump won the weekend because the White House was able to put its own political spin on the document before anyone else even had a chance to see it. The actual report may well justify Barr's assessment but who knows? There are many aspects of Barr's letter that raises some eyebrows about his impartiality.

4) I don't know where this is headed but I think we can all safely assume that Barr's opinion this past weekend is far from the end of it.

This is just a rehash of what shook lefties have been trying to spin this entire weekend.

Here's a dose of reality: if Barr was putting out findings that Mueller and his team absolutely did not put forth in their file, they'd be disputing Barr's letter already. It's asinine to have us believe that Barr could just put out whatever he wants, facts of the file be damned, and craft his own narrative after Mueller's team just spent 2 frigging years putting together the entire document.

Barr has been AG twice now, is one of the most respected guys in DC, stated at his Confirmation Hearing that he doesn't need the job and would quit instantly if Trump tried to erode his impartiality, and yet the narrative is "He's just another Trump lacky!". LOL ok then.
 
Really? The Muehler Report was just released. Is Pelosi psychic?


Sorry to fact check you when you're on such a roll but Congress hasn't had a damn thing to do with the report (yet.) The decision on the report's release was made by Muehler with, I'm assuming, some input from Attorney General Barr.



This is my first take on the issue since the submission of the Report and the public release of Barr's 'summary,' so let me give you my "irrational, tds-shook" thoughts:

1) No one outside of the WH and the Special Council's office has seen the Muehler report and reviewed any of the evidence that he and his team collected. Muehler tried to play impartial referee and indicated that he had evidence "on both sides" regarding the obstruction of justice issue. However, what we got Sunday was Trump's hand-picked AG's take on it.

2) But why did the AG issue his reaction in the first place (other than for political motives)? Like all the special council reports of the past on Nixon and Clinton, it's Congress, not the AG, that plays judge and jury.

3) Everyone is in agreement that a sitting President couldn't be indicted by Muehler--or the AG for that matter. The only ones who can do that is Congress. Similar to what happened with Ken Starr with his Starr Report, he provides the evidence and its up to Congress to act, or not act.

3) Trump won the weekend because the White House was able to put its own political spin on the document before anyone else even had a chance to see it. The actual report may well justify Barr's assessment but who knows? There are many aspects of Barr's letter that raises some eyebrows about his impartiality.

4) I don't know where this is headed but I think we can all safely assume that Barr's opinion this past weekend is far from the end of it.
you are so shook right now its hilarious. if you dont think that nothing was going to be found in the report before it was released, you are a complete fool. there have been countless leaks of info to the media for the past 2 years. we really havent seen anything like the amount of leaks before. i know you are really shook because you cant even bother to spell his name correctly. if you dont think people like pelosi got some advanced warning of the nothing burger, you are naive.

1. i hope they release this thing in its entirety.
2. because trump is a reality tv guy
3a. congress has been foaming at the mouth to do that for 2 years.
3b. historically people wait until late friday to do press releases like this because they want it to fly under the radar. if there was something in it, they wouldve released on mon/tue.
4. trump is an extremely petty person, ie his recent attacks on mccain. if you think hes going to take the past 2 years of constant attacks in stride, lol at you. he will likely go on the offensive and launch investigations of his own. im going to get a big bag of popcorn ready.
 
Here's a dose of reality: if Barr was putting out findings that Mueller and his team absolutely did not put forth in their file, they'd be disputing Barr's letter already.

Barr was essentially issuing an opinion based on Muehler's findings. Trouble is, it was never Barr's job to issue an opinion. Heck, Muehler spent two years gathering evidence and Barr issued an opinion in less than two days.

But I'll admit, you've got to give Barr and this Republican administration credit, they orchestrated the release of the Muehler Report beautifully. Immediately say 'no harm, no foul' before the report ever sees the light of day so that once the evidence is seen and considered, anything that Muehler uncovered and documented will be perceived as nothing more than partisan bullsh*t because Trump was "exonerated" this weekend by Barr.
 
Barr was essentially issuing an opinion based on Muehler's findings. Trouble is, it was never Barr's job to issue an opinion. Heck, Muehler spent two years gathering evidence and Barr issued an opinion in less than two days.

But I'll admit, you've got to give Barr and this Republican administration credit, they orchestrated the release of the Muehler Report beautifully. Immediately say 'no harm, no foul' before the report ever sees the light of day so that once the evidence is seen and considered, anything that Muehler uncovered and documented will be perceived as nothing more than partisan bullsh*t because Trump was "exonerated" this weekend by Barr.

Ok bud. You're clearly very upset that you didn't get your bombshell collusion confirmation and now you've resorted to needing to smear Barr's credibility to convince yourself that it's all actually in the report, if those evil Republicans would simply stop hiding the facts!

I mean, it's just sad at this point.
 
Ok bud. You're clearly very upset that you didn't get your bombshell collusion confirmation and now you've resorted to needing to smear Barr's credibility to convince yourself that it's all actually in the report, if those evil Republicans would simply stop hiding the facts!

I mean, it's just sad at this point.
Most importantly, it is illegal to release classified info in the report. But this wont matter since the left will use this baseless claim of trasparency to breathe hope into ninjaknight’s fantasy world where Hillary is president.
 
Really? The Muehler Report was just released. Is Pelosi psychic?


Sorry to fact check you when you're on such a roll but Congress hasn't had a damn thing to do with the report (yet.) The decision on the report's release was made by Muehler with, I'm assuming, some input from Attorney General Barr.



This is my first take on the issue since the submission of the Report and the public release of Barr's 'summary,' so let me give you my "irrational, tds-shook" thoughts:

1) No one outside of the WH and the Special Council's office has seen the Muehler report and reviewed any of the evidence that he and his team collected. Muehler tried to play impartial referee and indicated that he had evidence "on both sides" regarding the obstruction of justice issue. However, what we got Sunday was Trump's hand-picked AG's take on it.

2) But why did the AG issue his reaction in the first place (other than for political motives)? Like all the special council reports of the past on Nixon and Clinton, it's Congress, not the AG, that plays judge and jury.

3) Everyone is in agreement that a sitting President couldn't be indicted by Muehler--or the AG for that matter. The only ones who can do that is Congress. Similar to what happened with Ken Starr with his Starr Report, he provides the evidence and its up to Congress to act, or not act.

3) Trump won the weekend because the White House was able to put its own political spin on the document before anyone else even had a chance to see it. The actual report may well justify Barr's assessment but who knows? There are many aspects of Barr's letter that raises some eyebrows about his impartiality.

4) I don't know where this is headed but I think we can all safely assume that Barr's opinion this past weekend is far from the end of it.
Total scam. Release the report!!!
 
You know you've won the argument when these inbred MAGAts can't stop saying the word "shook". They are literally children
 
there is a reason a good number of people have ninja on ignore. you should consider it.

Yep, it's a well known fact that I have embarrassed the shit out of a few of you snowflake Republicans and you don't handle facts and reality very well, and you get reduced to a sniveling pile of inbred stupidity. Using words like "shook" and "butthurt" like the 4th grade reading level idiots that you are.

There is a reason Trump's speeches are kept at that 4th grade reading level, so his fan base can understand him.
 
Yep, it's a well known fact that I have embarrassed the shit out of a few of you snowflake Republicans and you don't handle facts and reality very well, and you get reduced to a sniveling pile of inbred stupidity. Using words like "shook" and "butthurt" like the 4th grade reading level idiots that you are.

There is a reason Trump's speeches are kept at that 4th grade reading level, so his fan base can understand him.

This is the very definition of shook. You have been waiting two years to find out it was a scam.
 
https://www.dailywire.com/news/45072/republicans-escalate-calls-adam-schiffs-ashe-schow

Republicans Escalate Calls For Adam Schiff’s Resignation. Here Are His Most Blatant Claims About Collusion.

If this son of a bitch has “evidence” of collusion then he needs to release it or resign. His pathetic claims that contradict the entire Mueller findings are beyond pathetic. He’s been a dickwad for 2 years and now he didn’t get his way so he’s going to still invent his own narrative.

Release evidence or get out, Schiff
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
inbred stupidity
I don’t know much about Ninjas, but this one is having a meltdown.

Ninjaknight as we speak

images
 
Is the word NinjaMeltdown an oxymoron?

Being the English major police that you are
:cop::cop::cop:

Serious question troll, have you graduated middle school yet? Or is it a part of your troll game where you pretend to be a dumbass AND immature? Genuinely would like to know.
 
You can't even quote right. Why do you have to make two posts every time? Rivals message board a little too complicated for your simple mind? Red hat cutting off blood flow to your feeble brain?
 
I think falling for a hoax has really triggered some. I get it when you watch MSNBC all day it can happen. They told you Jussie was legit. Trump collusion was legit . Trump wouldn't win. List goes on and on.

How long does one stay shook?
 
I think falling for a hoax has really triggered some. I get it when you watch MSNBC all day it can happen. They told you Jussie was legit. Trump collusion was legit . Trump wouldn't win. List goes on and on.

How long does one stay shook?
It’ll be on to the next hoax. They’re already trying to demonize barr so they can have the DNC mouthpiece CNN call it a sham etc etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ucfmikes
I think falling for a hoax has really triggered some. I get it when you watch MSNBC all day it can happen. They told you Jussie was legit. Trump collusion was legit . Trump wouldn't win. List goes on and on.

How long does one stay shook?

Don't forget the entire left falling for the Covington kids hoax and lie pushed from their side. You know, those EVIL kids who dared to smirk! Smirk while having a drum beat in their face - how dare they!!

We still have a poster on this board who thinks they got what was coming to them because of a SMIRK!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: KnighttimeJoe
Reminder: this was Obama’s lackey who ran the CIA for him. And he spent all last year on MSNBC and CNN peddling absolute lies and claiming they were legit becuase he still had intelligence sources

Total shitbag

 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT