Show me where you have evidence of the FBI knowingly misleading the judge. It's the judge's job to examine the evidence and decide if it is worthy of a warrant and the judge did.
Show me where you have evidence of the FBI knowingly misleading the judge. It's the judge's job to examine the evidence and decide if it is worthy of a warrant and the judge did.
Hopefully there will be an investigation of how all this went down. I have a feeling this will circle back to Obama and Clinton.
I don't agree with this. I think it all originates within the DOJ.I have a feeling this will circle back to Obama and Clinton.
So you don't have any evidence the DOJ made up stuff for the FISA judge and you're just throwing shit against the wall?Hopefully there will be an investigation of how all this went down. I have a feeling this will circle back to Obama and Clinton.
So you don't have any evidence the DOJ made up stuff for the FISA judge and you're just throwing shit against the wall?
So you don't have any evidence the DOJ made up stuff for the FISA judge and you're just throwing shit against the wall?
They knew the origins of it but they didn't know if the information was accurate or not. Much of it was. You can get a warrant off the word of a crackhead looking to snitch for a lighter jail sentence.They submitted a fake news dossier that they KNEW was the product of Clinton paid opposition dirt and of which they could verify nothing contained within.
Investigate all of them. We need to know who is responsible for this hoax and fake news witch hunt.
They knew the origins of it but they didn't know if the information was accurate or not. Much of it was. You can get a warrant off the word of a crackhead looking to snitch for a lighter jail sentence.
People will go down for this and we'll finally hold people accountable for launching this hoax that fueled anti-Trump hate mongers.
i honestly hope they get the full report unredacted. i dont want there to be any doubt. i think they will get the redacted copy like barr has said and they will complain. either way it will likely be good for trump.
then i want to see trump go on the offensive. it looks like barr is gearing up for it. cant wait.
oh i know it has to be, and that one senator used to believe that until it was against the other political party. it amusing how fast they change their tune. if it werent for double standards they wouldnt have any.It has to be redacted. There is classified material, grad jury witness testimony, and likely sensitive information about assets in there. I don't care what butthurt liberals think they need to see, they don't have any business demanding classified or grand jury witness testimony simply because they think there's a boogeyman hiding in there that they can use to discredit Barr's summary.
That said, Democrats absolutely will criminally leak information as they've been doing for years now. I just hope they're actually held accountable when that happens.
I don't need to see any of it. I would like to but realistically I probably shouldn't see the whole thing. I think members of Congress who control important things like who we declare war on can be allowed to see classified material. They make the laws for this country including election laws. An investigation into how Russia tried to influence our elections needs to be 100% available to those who make laws to prevent attacks like that. Arguing otherwise is putting Trump ahead of our own country.It has to be redacted. There is classified material, grad jury witness testimony, and likely sensitive information about assets in there. I don't care what butthurt liberals think they need to see, they don't have any business demanding classified or grand jury witness testimony simply because they think there's a boogeyman hiding in there that they can use to discredit Barr's summary.
That said, Democrats absolutely will criminally leak information as they've been doing for years now. I just hope they're actually held accountable when that happens.
I don't need to see any of it. I would like to but realistically I probably shouldn't see the whole thing. I think members of Congress who control important things like who we declare war on can be allowed to see classified material. They make the laws for this country including election laws. An investigation into how Russia tried to influence our elections needs to be 100% available to those who make laws to prevent attacks like that. Arguing otherwise is putting Trump ahead of our own country.
I don't care which members of Congress receive Classified briefings on the full report
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/11/politics/greg-craig-indicted-mueller-related/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
Obama's lawyer indicted for lying about his work with the Ukrainian government. Investigation originated by Mueller but passed off.
This man is innocent! Witch Hunt!
Democrats were hoping for a least a slice of ham to add to the Mueller report nothing burger. Wonder if they will even get a piece of lettuce?
Certainly won’t be enough to suppress their blood thirsty appetite to finally have their Trump “gotcha” moment
Could be more people missing work than the day after the Super Bowl. TDS is bad for the economyReally worried about TDS after the report is released
is everyone excited for the release tomorrow?!!?!?!
Trump and his lawyers are planning counter messaging. Why would you need a counter message to a report that totally exonerates the presidentI'm curious: if the report "totally exonerates" (hint: it doesn't) the President, why does he continue to slam Mueller and the FBI on twitter/TV/etc. over the report? It seems......silly.
Why is Barr even prespinning the report. If it's coming out for everyone in 60 min just let it come out.
You didn't really answer FC's question.Like anyone else you can have a press conference. Shook?
Like anyone else you can have a press conference. Shook?
But what is the point of a press conference if the press hasn't received the report and cant ask questions about the actual report? This was a spin job, nothing more nothing less. He came across more as Trump's defense attorney than an attorney general.
But what is the point of a press conference if the press hasn't received the report and cant ask questions about the actual report? This was a spin job, nothing more nothing less. He came across more as Trump's defense attorney than an attorney general.
The AG shouldn’t hold a press conference!!!!
But Loretta Lynch personally intervening in the FBI investigation of HRC was perfectly fine!!!
The AG shouldn’t hold a press conference!!!!
But Loretta Lynch personally intervening in the FBI investigation of HRC was perfectly fine!!!
Yeah - I honestly haven't put much into this whole thing because I don't think anything will come from it. That press conference was weird though. The AG basically saying that the president was justified to feel the way he did because of the mean press?
AG shouldn't be saying that sort of stuff.
Anyway - still think nothing will come from it and we need to beat him in an election.
Amen!That press conference was weird though. The AG basically saying that the president was justified to feel the way he did because of the mean press?
AG shouldn't be saying that sort of stuff.
What was the point of a press conference? He basically reiterated the letter he wrote, and then talked about how hard the press was on Trump. There was no point of it other than a spin job. If he really wanted to do a press conference, it should have been this afternoon after the report was released and people could ask actual questions about the report.
What was the point of a press conference? He basically reiterated the letter he wrote, and then talked about how hard the press was on Trump. There was no point of it other than a spin job. If he really wanted to do a press conference, it should have been this afternoon after the report was released and people could ask actual questions about the report.