Trump is in his 70s. It makes total sense for him from a risk mitigation standpoint to re-vaccinate with the same vaccine we're
'100% marketing' as
'The Boosters.'
Of course, the lack of actually updating the spike, the whole, original plan for
'The Boosters,' is why the entire FDA expert leadership has changed. I hope everyone understands this. Speaking of which ...
The U.S. was behind other countries in charting the spread of disease in the pandemic’s disastrous early months. It’s still behind as new variants threaten to disrupt the winter.
www.politico.com
Other countries are
not doing what we're doing when it comes any of this, and our utterly lack of data compared to the rest of the west is why the US CDC has become a complete embarrassment. We're literally pushing vaccines and Boosters in ways that even the Israelis are not -- especially kids.
E.g., the Israelis have vaccinated only 60K kids, it's 100% tracked and there are
no mandates on kids. Here in the US, we've done 4M, and there are mandates, and there is
no tracking for issues at all.
When Pharma
actually updates the spike, as was promised with mRNA, instead of using a nearly 2-year old synthesis that some are starting to state is actually a 'vector' for attack now with Omicron, I'll get it. Until then, no ... we have
0 data, except, of course,
'pushing existing product for $0 R&D.' Not my words, but the former FDA experts and WHO.
P.S. Partially in the CDC's defense, it's actually Big Tech. They like having incompatible systems, purposely so, so they can get exclusive contracts and avoid open standards. Big Tech and Congress are in cohorts, so that impacts the CDC. But the CDC still didn't have to end all sorts of tracking after April. That was 100% their own stupidity, pushed by the Biden administration to make itself look better, statistically.
Hence they
'5x more likely for the unvaccinated' BS, that has been utterly proven BS outside the US.
