Petite Woman Sucker Punches A Really Big Dude, then Gets Knocked the Fuggout

[UCFBS]

First off, I'll preface this with this fact ...

A man hitting an inanimate object is still wrong. He shouldn't initiate any time of 'aggression,' period. That was wrong, even if he didn't assault anyone, it set up a 'bad situation.'

Now, secondly, with that said ...

Women 'assault' men just as much as vice-versa, especially in the age where it's socially acceptable and even encouraged. This is one of the biggest issues even womens' shelters are trying to point out as of late, especially as many do not accept men (although this is slowly beginning to change).

The problem is that men still 'battery' women an order of magnitude more. For every 1 woman who batters a man, 20 men batter women. So that's why women who assault men are usually never charged.

The only way women stop assaulting men is to prosecute women. This includes prosecuting women who get return assaulted (and battered). Women should never be allowed to initiate violence. Women need to hold women accountable on this, and not excuse it when they get return assaulted (and often battered).

Maybe it'll start with something like #donthitfirst, getting women to understand that while they don't deserve to ever be battered, they have a social responsibility to tell all other women not to hit first and initiate an assault. Because it's been way, way too socially acceptable for way, way too long.

Especially as men are now holding men accountable for everything this decade, and that's good. We just need women to step it up with women ... because the rate of assaults by women are getting scaring, and it's still socially accepted. That's just wrong.

 

[DaShuckster]

I learn SO MUCH from threads like this and posters like this one:

The only way women stop assaulting men is to prosecute women.

Yeah, this growing epidemic of WOMEN assaulting men MUST STOP!!!!

...men are now holding men accountable for everything this decade.

Yeah, the "metoo" movement is a joke. Perverts like Cosby and Weinstein are in jail now because guys like us decided to hold other men accountable!!! Damn, are we good or what?!?!?!?

 

[UCFKnight85]

I learn SO MUCH from threads like this and posters like this one:



Yeah, this growing epidemic of WOMEN assaulting men MUST STOP!!!!



Yeah, the "metoo" movement is a joke. Perverts like Cosby and Weinstein are in jail now because guys like us decided to hold other men accountable!!! Damn, are we good or what?!?!?!?

You know that BS has stated that he was sexually assaulted yes?

 

[UCFBS]

I learn SO MUCH from threads like this and posters like this one:
Yeah, this growing epidemic of WOMEN assaulting men MUST STOP!!!!

It might not be politically correct, but spousal abuse professionals and volunteers have seen it overtake things.

Yeah, the "metoo" movement is a joke. Perverts like Cosby and Weinstein are in jail now because guys like us decided to hold other men accountable!!! Damn, are we good or what?!?!?!?

Hollywood is in another category. They've long had 'free passes' thanx to the left and the Clintons. #metoo wouldn't have come around had Clinton won. Heck, Clinton is still screwing this up every time she opens her mouth, excuses what men she knows do, and how only some women should be believed.

 

[sk8knight]

I learn SO MUCH from threads like this and posters like this one:



Yeah, this growing epidemic of WOMEN assaulting men MUST STOP!!!!



Yeah, the "metoo" movement is a joke. Perverts like Cosby and Weinstein are in jail now because guys like us decided to hold other men accountable!!! Damn, are we good or what?!?!?!?

FYI, Weinstein’s already had one set of charges dismissed because the prosecution didn’t turn over exculpatory evidence. With that said, I still think he’s a douchebag and that he probably is guilty of most of it. But we really do need to pump the brakes on ruining people’s lives before all of the facts are in.

 

[sirdingydang]

Of course, in theory, a man should never put his hands on a woman ... especially if he's three times her size. This guy should definitely face the consequences of his actions and receive adequate punishment for his lack of restraint. However, that being said ...

She assaulted him without just provocation and had her ass handed to her on a silver platter. If men shouldn't put their hands on a woman, then women should be held to the same standard.

Basically she acted like a man and was treated like a man.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...nd-parking-space-dispute.html#article-6279435

He clearly kicked their van, kicking backwards. He even looks back to see the damage he did to the side of their van. So, she goes after him. If you're defending him, you're as big of a piece of sh*t see he is.

 

[UCFBS]

He clearly kicked their van, kicking backwards. He even looks back to see the damage he did to the side of their van. So, she goes after him. If you're defending him, you're as big of a piece of sh*t see he is.

No one is defending him. It's getting old that people think people defend men, when a woman does something wrong as well. No, we're merely stating that she was just as wrong as him ... to start.

Yes, he shouldn't have been provocative. She should have left it to police to charge him. But in this day'n age, women do believe they can assault men, and men won't fight back.

So, no, women need to stop initiating assault on a person. No one -- male or female -- should think they are invincible. They very much are not. It's too socially acceptable for women to assault men and assume they will not fight back.

Men still batter women 20x over than vice-versa. But women are now equalizing men in initiating assault. It's been like that much of this decade. And the social experiments are quite eye opening, and sad, on this matter.

It should never be socially acceptable or excusable for anyone to assault anyone, no matter what happened prior. This woman wasn't defending herself. And one is not defending the man to point that out.

 

[UCFKnight85]

No one is defending him. It's getting old that people thing people defend men, when a woman does something wrong as well. No, we're merely stating that she was just as wrong as him ... to start.

Yes, he shouldn't have been provocative. She should have left it to police to charge him. But in this day'n age, women do believe they can assault men, and men won't fight back.

So, no, women need to stop initiating assault on a person. No one -- male or female -- should think they are invincible. They very much are not. It's too socially acceptable for women to assault men and assume they will not fight back.

Men still batter women 20x over than vice-versa. But women are now equalizing men in initiating assault. It's been like that much of this decade. And the social experiments are quite eye opening, and sad, on this matter.

It should never be socially acceptable or excusable for anyone to assault anyone, no matter what happened prior. This woman wasn't defending herself. And one is not defending the man to point that out.

Here’s the issue with your comment: the woman’s punch would be a mild aggravation. The guys punch absolutely could have killed her. There are indisputable differences in power of assault between men and women.

and the fat loser was the aggressor from the start. Fuk this guy.

 

[UCFBS]

Here’s the issue with your comment: the woman’s punch would be a mild aggravation. The guys punch absolutely could have killed her. There are indisputable differences in power of assault between men and women.
and the fat loser was the aggressor from the start. Fuk this guy.

Yes, screw him. But I think both should have been arrested.
She would get far, far lesser charges, but she shouldn't have been left off-the-hook.

 

[ucfversusbcs]

Yes, screw him. But I think both should have been arrested.
She would get far, far lesser charges, but she shouldn't have been left off-the-hook.

I see why you would think that, but shouldnt defending her property be considered standing her ground? This isnt two people arguing and she takes a shot at him.

 

[UCFBS]

I see why you would think that, but shouldnt defending her property be considered standing her ground?

Since when does anyone have the right to defend one's property?
One's self, yes, but not one's property.

In fact, wasn't there a recent arrest in this regard?
A store owner assaulting someone for stealing?

Yes, here in Florida.

This isnt two people arguing and she takes a shot at him.

Again, I said he instigated an issue, and that alone is something he should be arrested for (before the return battery).
But she decided to actually assault him first.

It would have been one thing had he actually accosted her directly.
But she decided to get out and not just confront him, but strike him.

Assault is assault, and charges should be filed.
He should get far more charges, let alone because of the battery.

But if she was a man, she would have been arrested for assault (even without battery).
This is the problem with the US courts right now, and judges and lawyers know it.

 

[ucfversusbcs]

Since when does anyone have the right to defend one's property?
One's self, yes, but not one's property.

Youre right. Even Texas expanded law doesnt protect from property damage.
However the older lady wouldve had a case to shoot the guy for beating up her daughter like that.

 

[UCFBS]

Youre right. Even Texas expanded law doesnt protect from property damage.
However the older lady wouldve had a case to shoot the guy for beating up her daughter like that.

Yes, she would have.
But the daughter should still be charged with assault afterwards.

Listen guys, some of you speak out of both sides of your mouth.
Understand what I'm saying.

People should not assault other people, especially people clearly who have a problem in the first place.
Again, if this woman was a man, she would have been charged as well.

But she's a woman, so she was not.
That's how the courts work, society works, etc...

And it's really f'd up.

 

[sk8knight]

Here’s the issue with your comment: the woman’s punch would be a mild aggravation. The guys punch absolutely could have killed her. There are indisputable differences in power of assault between men and women.

and the fat loser was the aggressor from the start. Fuk this guy.

That’s why he should be charged with aggravated battery and she with simple battery.

 

[UCFBS]

That’s why he should be charged with aggravated battery and she with simple battery.

I don't think she should even be charged with battery, just assault. Enforcement of laws are about deterrent. It's completely non-PC, but until we hold women accountable, assaults by women will continue to increase. We have to showcase how all Americans, regardless of sex, will be held accountable, and no one gets any pass.

Now had he actually assaulted her (battery or not) first, then she shouldn't be charged with anything at all. When someone is actually attacking you directly, whole different story. But otherwise, people need to realize that it's not worth assaulting someone over property. Take a picture. Leave the area, especially if police are not around. And if not, do not assault someone, if you're going to confront them.

This woman is a textbook example. If you are able to leave the area, do so. Don't inflame and otherwise escalate the situation. It's unfortunate that he countered her escalation with some serious battery. And he should get some serious time for that. There are just so many of these that go on.

It's not about who's right/wrong. It's about doing the right thing, and avoiding liability. It's too socially acceptable for women to assault people. It's not 'sticking up for oneself' to assault someone. There's a huge difference between confronting someone and assaulting them.

 

[ucfversusbcs]

Now had he actually assaulted her (battery or not) first, then she shouldn't be charged with anything at all.

Not sure if youre serious.

 

[sk8knight]

I don't think she should even be charged with battery, just assault. Enforcement of laws are about deterrent. It's completely non-PC, but until we hold women accountable, assaults by women will continue to increase. We have to showcase how all Americans, regardless of sex, will be held accountable, and no one gets any pass.

Now had he actually assaulted her (battery or not) first, then she shouldn't be charged with anything at all. When someone is actually attacking you directly, whole different story. But otherwise, people need to realize that it's not worth assaulting someone over property. Take a picture. Leave the area, especially if police are not around. And if not, do not assault someone, if you're going to confront them.

This woman is a textbook example. If you are able to leave the area, do so. Don't inflame and otherwise escalate the situation. It's unfortunate that he countered her escalation with some serious battery. And he should get some serious time for that. There are just so many of these that go on.

It's not about who's right/wrong. It's about doing the right thing, and avoiding liability. It's too socially acceptable for women to assault people. It's not 'sticking up for oneself' to assault someone. There's a huge difference between confronting someone and assaulting them.

She should be charged with the crime she committed. She should not get a ride because she's stupid or because her crime resulted in another crime against her. If you want to deter people, charge them with the crimes they commit and prosecute them for it. Then, reduce the sentences due to mitigating factors.

We're in agreement that excusing people for the crimes they commit because they're part of a group, whether advantaged or disadvantaged, only encourages more criminal actions.