Thought I would pop back in and get a laugh reading the liberal sheep comments. I find it amusing how little you know. It isn't surprising though, the media treats you like mushrooms. They basically feed you shit and keeps you in the dark. You people probably want to watch FOX to see what is actually going on with the WIKILEAKS revelations. The democrats are pretty much running a banana republic. Every single day something new is coming out.
Let me school you sheeple up since they won't tell you:
1. Proof last may, the democrats were colluding to set up craigslist job add and groping, lends credence that what is going on now is a farce. Hermain Cain 2.0
But it's still Trump. You cannot deny what Trump has done.
Ironically Trump is exactly like Bill Clinton on women's rights, and even more progressive on LGBT (the Clintons pay a lot of lip service), in his enterprise for the past 20 or so years. But he's exactly like Clinton on the
'Do as I say NOT Do as I do.' The Atlantic's Caitlin Flanagan talks about how we've changed over 25 years, even if most of the alleged offenses were in the same time period as Bill's.
-
https://www.washingtonpost.com/post...mps-accusers-but-didnt-believe-bill-clintons/
2. Proof that the POTUS actually did know about the HRC server.
Yep, a lot of that has come out. State (even Defense barking at State) as well as the President and his administration, plus the DNC. But she refused to follow policy. And given State and others turned off their Trend Micro security, repeatedly (why didn't they just whitelist her servers?), you can see why FBI agents are pretty pissed off right now in having their 'wrists shackled.'
Over the next few years we're going to see a lot of this come out. There are a lot of FBI agents who hate how they are looking technically incompetent in the industry circles. No, they weren't incompetent. They were totally handicapped and directly prevented from investigating in many cases. No seizure of assets, fixed questions, immunity granted without any attempt to get the truth (the whole reason why immunity is granted), etc... The FBI got nothing, and that's why they found nothing.
3. "Ring China with missile defense". Giving a hit to her foreign policy behavior.
You mean Clinton
agrees that North Korea is China's problem just like Ron Paul, Gary Johnson and now Donald Trump has stated?! But ... but ... but ... the US media says otherwise!
NOTE: This is my biggest pet-peeve. North Korea is China's problem, and we pressure China exactly this way! "No nukes in North Korea or we deploy them in Taiwan" goes back to the Clinton administration! Geo-politics 101.
4. HRC calling Common Core "a political failure" completely contradictory to her public policy position
The Department of Education is a full hypocrisy in action. Most teachers want things more local, and an end to the non-sense of both state and, even more so, the big, single federal where publishers and special interest dictate policy.
Being my wife is a PhD candidate in education, and I come from a large, Open Source vendor and have been involved with Open Educational Resources (OERs), you can see how the 'grassroots community' of Education's growing 'Open Source' effort is trying to wrestle control back from the state and federal lobbyists and their publishers into the hands of teachers.
The DoE needs to be seriously nuked and take away all that power. It's bad enough the state of Florida is doing eTextbooks and it's a joke, especially in low income areas.
5. "And as I've mentioned we've all been quite content to demean government drop Civics and in general conspired to produce and underwear and compliant citizenry... The unawareness remain strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demand some serious serious thinking and not just pull driven demographically inspired messaging" LIBERAL SHEEPLE
Agreed. The result of Vietnam. It's funny to watch the Federal Watch Lists grow 10x during the Obama administration, than when W. left office.
6. Qatar gave WJC $1m fir his birthday. Aug 17, 2014 in a separate email states HRC to Podesta stated Qatar was funding ISIS. Revelation, the Clinton's are taking bribes from a sponsors of terrorism.
And here's the thing ...
The left wing media says, "Oh, it's all for charity." No! It's all for Clinton Foundation
contractors and officers! Most of that information is completely private, and there's a reason the Clinton administration refuses to release any information.
The Clintons' entered the White House with a lot of trash. They are still carrying them around. That's what the Clinton Foundation is about!
7. HRC received the exact debate questions from Donna Brazile's prior to a debate against Bernie Sanders. They rigged that town hall.
So, we've actually learned a lot here. It's not that simple, but we are
finally starting to see how this all works!
Many media outlets work with the DNC and, more limitedly, the RNC, just like Fox is a big one with the RNC and, more limitedly, the DNC. It's not that the journalists, the real backend journalists and not the mouthpieces and analysts, are doing this. It's that there are so many people, so many partners, so many contractors, so many extras in the whole process with credentials, that do not have journalistic integrity.
I honestly do believe some in CNN are really pissed off right now, and for good reason. It's not just grandstanding. And what we're finally seeing is how it all works. That a partner in the debate directly leaked those questions. We are seeing how much 'control' and 'access' the DNC has, and more precisely, where it happens. It's 3rd parties, it's contractors, it's partners, it's not the media outlet itself, but
those who have top credentials in the media outlet who do.
In other words, the ethics of journalism in the US is pretty f'd up now. But that really goes back to the late '80s and early '90s when Congress brought down the walls that allowed 'Big Media' conglomerates. Now there are only a few organizations that work across lots of markets, with some of the same 3rd parties and partners that can be controlled. This is finally reaching the point where it's a real problem, and CNN is recognizing it.
8. HRC states "my dream is a hemispheric common market with open trade in open borders" Open borders....yeah okay
So, right now there are lot of mis-quotes in this area. Take Gary Johnson, who is for free markets, and 'likes the premise' of NAFTA and TPP. Then he lambasts them both as 'special interest' and 'crony capitalism' because they are not actually 'free trade.' Gee, where did I hear that before? Oh, that's right, Ross Perot in his debate with Al Gore on NAFTA in the mid '90s.
But are NAFTA and the TPP any different than any typical, Congressional bill? Have you looked at even the ACA? Do you think your Congressmen and women actually write these things any more? Congress is no longer run by the people, but the lobbyists that write the bills, and then they are sold in ways that are one-liner, even though they are hundreds to thousands of pages long. We've gone from thousands of pages a year to hundreds of thousands of pages in Congress. No one keeps up.
The only way to stop it is to force lobbyists and special interest to more than 1 'clearing house.' Heck, how the TPP was drafted is a perfect example of what's wrong.
9. Clintons campaign chief owns 75,000 shares in Russian connected energy company, the same company that Hillary Clinton gave 20% rights of the United States uranium to.
And the sad thing is ... they never disclosed this. This was finally discovered due to investigative journalism.
If I hear one more person say the Clinton Foundation is 'transparent' ... sigh.
10. Clinton campaign colliding directly with the media.
The best exposure was the $50M SuperPAC that hit during the debate week.
SuperPACs are not supposed to be controlled by the campaign. But as we now know P
odesta directed the attack, planning starting 3 weeks earlier. It spent 12x as much as Gary Johnson's own, entire campaign, in a half-dozen states, and totally trashed Gary Johnson. I'm not talking about the gaffes (that's on Johnson himself, he even owns up to them), but some are flat out slander and libel -- but any lawsuits will come too late, after the election. It was important for Hillary to get those 4-5% points back from Johnson. Like the Koch connection (easily disproven), and saying he is only running this year to siphon Millennial votes (ignoring everything in 2012), spouting off false connections and everything else that won't stick.
But the great thing about this is that
it finally exposed all the DNC mouthpieces in the media, directly -- you now knew exactly who they were, and that
it was fully coordinated, because it wasn't just the long-standing Republican feud. It was the DNC and Hillary telling Podesta to direct an attack on a 3rd party with a huge budget, the first time we've ever seen this, and it was massive.
Bill Mahr was absolutely outed. Just months ago he was talking about how there needs to be more access to 3rd parties, even mentioning Johnson, and then he was reciting the gospel written by Podesta just 3 weeks earlier. We didn't see it in Flordia. But it's all over several states out west.
11. Demeaning Catholics saying that they were bastardizing the religious faith
Well, remember ... unlike Bill Clinton, who believed anyone could change their mind, Hillary Clinton is in the mindset that a third to half of all Americans should never be listened to. This is the growing, Liberal epidemic ... in the UK, in Germany, in the US ... that conservatives should never be listened to.
Take the 3-5% that are really bad, and apply it to 30-50%. Call them 'racists' if they question the rate of immigration. Call them 'Nazis' if they point out issues with domestic policy. Use 'shutdown words' to prevent any debate. But what does that do? It alienates moderates who are logical.
E.g., the Germans (and British) that say,
"The US accepted 1.2M refugees over 25 years during the Indochina Refugee Crisis (1975-2000) and Germany, a much smaller country, has accepted that many in just over a single year! This is not sustainable!" But, they're 'Nazis' (and 'racists). And you wonder why they voted 30%+ right-wing (and Brexit)?
Liberals push moderates to go conservative! Trump had moderates 2:1 over Clinton until recent
exactly because of that!
The New Yorker had a perfect example, indirectly, of how Bill was the great unifier, and Hillary is the great marginalizer.
The New Yorker was basically condoning it too.
12. An email proving her campaign was pushing Obama is a Muslim and used cocaine.
The President does consider his Muslim roots often, yes. But that on its own is not the problem. Even Colin Powell is tired of that, and I don't blame him. So drop the Muslim BS, okay? It is a distraction.
More debate argument is Dinesh D'Souza's that the President is apologetic because he's anti-Imperialism, or perceived anti-Imperialism. This kinda explains the Obama administrations first 6-7 years of foreign policy, which he is trying to reverse his final 1-2 years. President Obama will
13. HRC daughter embezzled from the Clinton foundation
Actually, this may be correct. Chelsea is worse than her parents. I don't think people realize her moral compass is totally f'd up. But ... what did you expect from those 2? I'm dead serious. There are people who know her and believe this.
Although some of Trump's kids aren't exactly perfect either. Which brings us to the reality ...
Affluent Americans -- of any race -- don't represent us Americans.
I would even admit that 50% of the reason I'm voting Gary Johnson is because he does represent us Americans. A handiman who grew a business from scratch, then was pissed off enough after the early '90s recession to run for governor on largely his own money, over the continued objections of his own party (they wanted him to run for the legislature first -- and Johnson said they needed to be stopped, and only Executive could do that), and was known as Dr. No / Mr. Veto and brutally honest. Like, 'explain this to me in 5 minutes, and don't give me that double-speak.' Oh they hated him. He pissed of every pork loving legislator in New Mexico, not just the controlling Democratic party, but his own, minority Republican party. Even today they badmouth him, while the state views him extremely favorably.
He showed so much 'tell me how this benefits taxpayers' contempt at times, that he vetoed the budget -- a multi-billion dollar budget -- when it was only a few hundred thousand over the agreed upon target! Now that's a guy we need in DC! A literally 'Mr. Johnson goes to Washington, like he did Santa Fe.'
There is far more to come out, but the liberal media is not covering it. Why, because they know liberals are too lazy to learn the Truth.
Actually, CNN is going to be a 'turning point.' They are now starting
As Obama's wife said. "If you can't run your house, you can't run the white house."
She's a hypocrite, but I'll give her extra credit for embracing W. at the opening of the African American museum a few weeks back.
'No lobbyists will find a home in my administration'
'The most transparent administration'
But in all honestly, the Obama family is kinda like the W. family in how they treat people and White House staff. I guess that's why they 'get along' outside of the politics. The Clintons ... absolutely the opposite. White House staffers hated them with a passion. Secret Service had all sorts of phrases for Hillary's 'situations.'
Here is my thoughts on wasted votes.
1. Every vote beyond what it took to beat the other candidate is technically a wasted vote.
2. If you are in a state where either side is leading by 20+ points voting 3rd party is not wasting a vote. 3rd party votes amassed with the down candidate, typically would still not help the down candidate win.
3. If you are in a battleground state and you vote for a 3rd party candidate you are wasting a vote. Look at ole Al Gore, he lost by just over 300 votes. Had the people not voted for the 3rd party candidate 19000+ votes. Gore would have won.
What about Bush in 1992? Clinton couldn't even get 50%.
No, this country does not change until people vote their conscious. If the Libertarians capture 5%, they get partially subsidized, like the Democrats and Republicans.
Here are my closing thoughts to those falling on their moral swords.
Take a moment and reflect on this quote from President William Howard Taft:
"Presidents come and go, but the Supreme Court goes on forever."
Trump and Clinton will only be in office for 4-8 years. Their (2-3) SCOTUS appointments will continue for generations beyond either Trump or Clinton's departure.
Yes, but I have a problem with both Democrats and Republicans when it comes to the SCOTUS.
WTF are we Americans so about 'oh, this rights are important, but not these?' Why can't we need the 2/3rds of Americans that believe in both the 2nd Amendment and your right to defend yourself, including against tyranny, and the right of a woman to her own body, and not what the government holds a gun to her head and tells her to do?
I choose to trust average Americans more than the government! Why can't everyone else? And that's the ultimate insult.
Republicans pass laws in Texas that make it
exceedingly difficult for a woman
to exercise her civil right.
Democrats pass laws in New York that make it
exceedingly difficult for anyone
to exercise their civil right.
When
2/3rds of Americans believe in a right ... and people
cannot get a supermajority to pass a Constitutional Amendment to outlaw it, it's the
ultimate insult to civics to pass laws that undermine their ability to exercise those rights! No, this must end! Do not tolerate it America!
People who f' with civil rights, because they cannot get a supermajority to agree to end them!
No,
I refuse to endorse either Democratic or Republican parties when it comes to the SCOTUS "problem." The problem is the US media barking about what rights are and are not important.
We see-saw every 4-8 years on this, and lose more of both sets of rights as a result!!!
We can agree to disagree on the fact that there are only two viable candidates for this election; Trump or Clinton.
Bullshit. Johnson is on the ballot in all 50 states plus DC, and if he gets 30%+, that could mean the Presidency.
Compare the 2016 'Town Hall' with the original 1992 one. You Trump supporters bitched about Hillary and the media ... if you would have freak'n allowed Johnson there, that would have blown everything!
CNN doesn't even count age 18-34 in its polls, and all 5 included a 4-way, with 2-way, instead of 3-way to prevent Johnson from polling nearly 15%.
Even Ross Perot did not qualify under the CPD rules put in place after the '96.
But look at what Ross Perot's inclusion did for the Town Hall? No ... let's have non-sense like we did in 2016. Sigh ... this is exactly what is wrong! The left controlled media framing everything in only their values.
If both Hillary and Trump lose Utah and New Mexico, it may very well
prevent either from getting 270 electoral votes.
Side Note: Although Johnson and Stein's lawsuits against the CPD were dropped, a 3rd party watchdog's lawsuit is actually moving forward and will be heard in the courts. That may be good news for 2020+. They not only make the 15% is impossible argument, but argue that Johnson actually did achieve 15%, when the polling was modified to be non-partisan, instead of purposely bi-partisan.
I implore you to consider this question. Do you want a president that would appoint justices whom malign with the direction you would consider appropriate or would you rather the country go in the opposite direction? Congress has successfully proven they are inept in decision making. Their inability to pass law, pushes vital decisions made for this country to the Supreme Court. What will that court look like is the question?
I want freak'n all rights preserved! I'm tired of this 'oh, these rights aren't important, only these are.' It's all games the US media plays. They twist the statistics too.
If you are a conservative I ask that you seriously consider not voting 3rd party, put down your moral sword and cast your vote for Trump. The future of this country depends on it.
No, people lose the election
because not enough people voted FOR them. Not this 'anti' bullshit.
I wouldn't bother replying to me, I won't respond. That is all.
And guess what happens if 30%+ 'wastes their vote'? Gary Johnson could be president. No, it's time to send the 2 parties packing.
