Some people are worried about the left. And some people are sick of mass shootings.I think a law requiring exchange of firearms to be conducted through a FFL or a police station (with attendant background checks) for all transactions not involving close familial relations ( out to first and maybe second cousins) may be a compromise. But when the left can barely hide the end goal of removing all legal firearms from society, it’s not hard to see why 2A supporters are demanding their politicians not give an inch. It doesn’t help when our Dear Leader comes out and states that 9mm round blow up a lung and strongly implies getting rid of all firearms capable of firing any round more powerful than a .22LR. Then follow it up with the blatant falsehood about not being able to own cannons at the time of the Constitution. And then much of the same crowd falls all over itself defending Alec Baldwin for his negligent homicide.
The common question among 2A advocates (largely rhetorical at this point) is “Why are the people who are the most adamant about ridding people of their Constitutional right to bear arms those who are the most ignorant of everything about said arms?”
The other common question is: “With all of the factors in play in any mass shooting situation, why is the left only ever interested in talking about the only factor that is an enumerated Constitutional right?”