Just an idea, long term is meaningless if the short term or medium short term is 2 superconferences and a 3rd. Adding SDSU, UCF, Cincy, Houston, Memphis, or any G5, gets your conference ignored. I agree with the idea that a better long term would be those, just look at what Memphis has done in football over the decade(s). They've went from usf bad to one of the best in the conference. The lot above, are probably better than the doormat Pac or Big XII teams year in year out. But the stigma of filling your conference with G5s over 'names' from the PAC 1. keeps the PAC alive and a competitor and 2. downgrades the Big XII as a possible P3 in prestige, which is the only difference between P5 and G5. Not really sure why this is even discussed. We actually lived through this. We were the last champion of the Big East, a BCS conference. Then filled with non-BCS regardless of the embarrassment of the Big XII champion, it wasn't even considered, eventho it had Cincy, Uconn, usf all BCS teams. Haven't we heard for a year about the weakness of the new Big XII with all those non-P5 fill ins, and that's with BYU.