ADVERTISEMENT

Delicious Bull Tears Mega Thread

From Bull Daly:
Lol people seem to forget that this thread was built on fantasy & speculation not reality. For crying out loud we had Yoda dressed up in a Tuxedo for the occasion. The super conferences will eventually blow up anyway. Better chance for USF when we see a 12 to 16 team playoff imo



So the conferences that pull in the most revenue will explode? Mmkay Yeah, all USF needs is 12-16 teams in the playoff and they are shoe in at 3-9.
Thats like thinking the s&p 500 companies are all going to blow up allowing Matt Grothe’s Polar Cup business the opportunity to thrive in its place
 
  • Haha
Reactions: muckdawg24
We weren’t in the same boat. The situation last year was the Big 12 adding teams. The situation this year is potentially adding teams as the PAC 12 implodes. If PAC 12 was available to raid last year, some of those teams would have taken priority in Big 12 expansion. As it was, the Big 12 in 2021 took 4 name brand teams that have all won major bowls and been highly ranked recently. UCF in particular has cracked the top 15 of the AP in 5 different seasons over the past 9 years and appeared in 3 major bowls. A team like SDSU is not in that same boat. They just aren’t. Boise is. And Boise if it weren’t for academics coukd be high on future expansion lists.
You look through black and gold colored glasses. People out west do not see UCF the same way we do. Ask yourself, if the PAC teams were available last year would it have been better for the B12 to take Oregon State because they were a P5 or UCF? As for Boise they have done well. What is their upside? Where do they go from here? Do they add a big potential viewership?

UCF is more than bowl wins. There is a much bigger factor in play. School size and location probably most of all.
 
FMYY5XYXsAAgfeW
Look what we've done everybody! We found a blank piece of paper. I thought we'd hold a press conference about it.
 
You look through black and gold colored glasses. People out west do not see UCF the same way we do. Ask yourself, if the PAC teams were available last year would it have been better for the B12 to take Oregon State because they were a P5 or UCF? As for Boise they have done well. What is their upside? Where do they go from here? Do they add a big potential viewership?

UCF is more than bowl wins. There is a much bigger factor in play. School size and location probably most of all.
The Big 12 would have taken PAC 12 schools over the G5 adds had they been available. It’s not even a question really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shark19
The Big 12 would have taken PAC 12 schools over the G5 adds had they been available. It’s not even a question really.
Would it have been the best long term move? Oregon State/ Washington State or UCF/Cinci? Which would be the better long term move.
 
Would it have been the best long term move? Oregon State/ Washington State or UCF/Cinci? Which would be the better long term move.
Until we show we can do everything it takes to succeed at that level, the P5s have the advantage.....and I was shocked how good Wash St viewership is.

It takes more than being a fake #2 for 5 days......

CMon, bring us more usf content, I want to be in a good mood going into the weekend.
 
Would it have been the best long term move? Oregon State/ Washington State or UCF/Cinci? Which would be the better long term move.
Just an idea, long term is meaningless if the short term or medium short term is 2 superconferences and a 3rd. Adding SDSU, UCF, Cincy, Houston, Memphis, or any G5, gets your conference ignored. I agree with the idea that a better long term would be those, just look at what Memphis has done in football over the decade(s). They've went from usf bad to one of the best in the conference. The lot above, are probably better than the doormat Pac or Big XII teams year in year out. But the stigma of filling your conference with G5s over 'names' from the PAC 1. keeps the PAC alive and a competitor and 2. downgrades the Big XII as a possible P3 in prestige, which is the only difference between P5 and G5. Not really sure why this is even discussed. We actually lived through this. We were the last champion of the Big East, a BCS conference. Then filled with non-BCS regardless of the embarrassment of the Big XII champion, it wasn't even considered, eventho it had Cincy, Uconn, usf all BCS teams. Haven't we heard for a year about the weakness of the new Big XII with all those non-P5 fill ins, and that's with BYU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: beelit47
Just an idea, long term is meaningless if the short term or medium short term is 2 superconferences and a 3rd. Adding SDSU, UCF, Cincy, Houston, Memphis, or any G5, gets your conference ignored. I agree with the idea that a better long term would be those, just look at what Memphis has done in football over the decade(s). They've went from usf bad to one of the best in the conference. The lot above, are probably better than the doormat Pac or Big XII teams year in year out. But the stigma of filling your conference with G5s over 'names' from the PAC 1. keeps the PAC alive and a competitor and 2. downgrades the Big XII as a possible P3 in prestige, which is the only difference between P5 and G5. Not really sure why this is even discussed. We actually lived through this. We were the last champion of the Big East, a BCS conference. Then filled with non-BCS regardless of the embarrassment of the Big XII champion, it wasn't even considered, eventho it had Cincy, Uconn, usf all BCS teams. Haven't we heard for a year about the weakness of the new Big XII with all those non-P5 fill ins, and that's with BYU.
Good take. I would consider memphis, boise, and sdsu to be “back burner candidates”. So if we landed the two AZ schools but utah and colorado held out for whatever reason, we could maybe add memphis and sdsu and we would be right to do so.
One thing that is somewhat of an intangible with regards to sdsu, san diego was big on the chargers and most abandoned them when they moved to LA. SD peeps hate LA peeps. Their alumni are very much passionate about their team like we are and i think they are moving into an OCS because the okd chargers stadium they rented is being repurposed. I say this to say that SD is the 6th largest city and they dont have an nfl team. Could be value there but would still be best to add p5 brands first
 
Until we show we can do everything it takes to succeed at that level, the P5s have the advantage.....and I was shocked how good Wash St viewership is.

It takes more than being a fake #2 for 5 days......

CMon, bring us more usf content, I want to be in a good mood going into the weekend.
Problem is that the cows have gone stale, I mean really stale. IPF not going to be done until December, OCS still not in motion, They have not been asked to the ACC yet so well yawn...
 
Just an idea, long term is meaningless if the short term or medium short term is 2 superconferences and a 3rd. Adding SDSU, UCF, Cincy, Houston, Memphis, or any G5, gets your conference ignored. I agree with the idea that a better long term would be those, just look at what Memphis has done in football over the decade(s). They've went from usf bad to one of the best in the conference. The lot above, are probably better than the doormat Pac or Big XII teams year in year out. But the stigma of filling your conference with G5s over 'names' from the PAC 1. keeps the PAC alive and a competitor and 2. downgrades the Big XII as a possible P3 in prestige, which is the only difference between P5 and G5. Not really sure why this is even discussed. We actually lived through this. We were the last champion of the Big East, a BCS conference. Then filled with non-BCS regardless of the embarrassment of the Big XII champion, it wasn't even considered, eventho it had Cincy, Uconn, usf all BCS teams. Haven't we heard for a year about the weakness of the new Big XII with all those non-P5 fill ins, and that's with BYU.
If the Big 12 wins games that matter….it all takes care of itself.
 
You look through black and gold colored glasses. People out west do not see UCF the same way we do. Ask yourself, if the PAC teams were available last year would it have been better for the B12 to take Oregon State because they were a P5 or UCF? As for Boise they have done well. What is their upside? Where do they go from here? Do they add a big potential viewership?

UCF is more than bowl wins. There is a much bigger factor in play. School size and location probably most of all.
You're not going to win this argument. I'm going to be nice and tell you to put your glasses back on and roll.
 
None were asked to join the PAC because there were none that the PAC thought worthy at the time. I am sure there were plenty who would have jumped at the time because the PAC with the LA schools is better than the B12 leftovers. So the B12 back filled with G5s. Now it is role reversal only B12 is not as shortsighted as the PAC. But now the PAC leftovers are exposed. Oregon State and Washington State are nothing less that SDSU. The B12 considers markets, facilities, growth and brand. G5 vs P5 is dead for the moment. It is now a numbers game when it comes to inclusion. It is why the cows get mentioned from time to time even though they suck.
you are correct about South Florida. What i read from other parts of the country is they are the next best available option in the east but their facilities are a non starter. But from the best that i could coble together from this disagreement, which should have its own thread, shouldn't be in Bull Tears thread, I think you are more on the money. It wasn't about the Pac 12 offering anybody. Everybody in the Big 12 asked if they could join, not formally of course. But every Big 12 school asked if the pac 12 had any interest in them. The Pac 12 said no. Nobody was going to leave the safety of the Pac 12 to join a conference that was going to collapse (the Big 12). Since the pac passed on everybody, the remnants of the Big 12 banded together and decided to do the best they could do and add the next best 4 schools which happened to be BYU, Cincy, UCF and Houston (I thought Memphis would have been a better add, but Houston is a much larger market.)

If things had happened in the reverse order, USC and UCLA announced last July they were leaving for the Big 10, and OU and Texas were not headed for the SEC at that time, the Big 12 could have had their pick of any of the Pac 12 leftovers- the Big 12 would have seemed safe with OU and UT still on board. The Big 12 could have expanded with 2-6 schools from the Pac 12 (expanding to 12-16 members). Having done so, their media rights contract with OU and UT still on board would have been worth a lot more. OU and Texas might have stayed in the Big 12- if the money would be close, and they could still be the top dogs, they probably would have stayed and we (UCF) would not have gotten the call up to the big leagues.

I forget who mentioned that we were lucky that things happened the way they did, but that person couldn't have been more right.
 
you are correct about South Florida. What i read from other parts of the country is they are the next best available option in the east but their facilities are a non starter. But from the best that i could coble together from this disagreement, which should have its own thread, shouldn't be in Bull Tears thread, I think you are more on the money. It wasn't about the Pac 12 offering anybody. Everybody in the Big 12 asked if they could join, not formally of course. But every Big 12 school asked if the pac 12 had any interest in them. The Pac 12 said no. Nobody was going to leave the safety of the Pac 12 to join a conference that was going to collapse (the Big 12). Since the pac passed on everybody, the remnants of the Big 12 banded together and decided to do the best they could do and add the next best 4 schools which happened to be BYU, Cincy, UCF and Houston (I thought Memphis would have been a better add, but Houston is a much larger market.)

If things had happened in the reverse order, USC and UCLA announced last July they were leaving for the Big 10, and OU and Texas were not headed for the SEC at that time, the Big 12 could have had their pick of any of the Pac 12 leftovers- the Big 12 would have seemed safe with OU and UT still on board. The Big 12 could have expanded with 2-6 schools from the Pac 12 (expanding to 12-16 members). Having done so, their media rights contract with OU and UT still on board would have been worth a lot more. OU and Texas might have stayed in the Big 12- if the money would be close, and they could still be the top dogs, they probably would have stayed and we (UCF) would not have gotten the call up to the big leagues.

I forget who mentioned that we were lucky that things happened the way they did, but that person couldn't have been more right.
USF won't be the front runner for the East once The University of North Carolina at Charlotte – plays a few years in the American. Their stadium was approved in 2008 and finished in 2012. Seating 15K got the ball rolling and now planned to expand. The 15k stadium puts them ahead of USF.

Charlotte 49ers to double Jerry Richardson Stadium capacity as part of $100 million athletics growth plan​

https://www.bizjournals.com/charlot...arlotte-charlotte-49ers-hok-jenkins-peer.html
 
I think he was oc when they had deshaun and subsequently trevor lawrence. Anyone could look like a genius with those two qbs in college, especially against the acc
Co-OC…it’s been said that he was basically just in title b/c he was there like 15 years, he didn’t call plays. He’s a boob, glad he coaches the cows.
 
USF won't be the front runner for the East once The University of North Carolina at Charlotte – plays a few years in the American. Their stadium was approved in 2008 and finished in 2012. Seating 15K got the ball rolling and now planned to expand. The 15k stadium puts them ahead of USF.

Charlotte 49ers to double Jerry Richardson Stadium capacity as part of $100 million athletics growth plan​

https://www.bizjournals.com/charlot...arlotte-charlotte-49ers-hok-jenkins-peer.html
i love below ground level lower bowls. wish we could have those in florida. saves a lot of money too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knight_tracker
If the Big 12 wins games that matter….it all takes care of itself.
The AAC wins games that matter, and yet there is no P6. Memphis, Tulsa have been impressive in games that matter, yet not so great there after. I'm just nervous of the probably very small chance the Big 12 becomes the new Big East.

*** had to look up SDSU to see if they ever won any games that matter, may have, but I gave up and have to agree they fit in perfectly with the Big 12 or at least with Baylor, look up girl raped by 5 football players covered up/not investigated by university. (Here's hoping that's resolved.)
 
Just heard way too many 'Big XII is weakest' articles over the last year, with many others saying it's obviously the PAC.
There are a couple of ways to look at this. There are those that say that the PAC12 has the better top end schools.....which is true IMO. But......that is precisely the problem with the BIG or SEC looking at 3 or 4 of them to poach in the next couple of years if they don't want to do the heavy lifting to break up the ACC.

OTOH, the Big12 has a better competitive league top to bottom, with no blue blood or National brands, and the 4 corner schools are being smart to see what we offer.
 
They are now talking about how we beat a UF team in the bowl that was playing their 2nd & 3rd string and didn’t care about the game. I was in the stands with some UF guys, the fans surely cared and still triggered today. The teams were definitely playing hard and only a DL was sitting out that any of us could see. Elam even played, don’t know where that narrative came from as just wasn’t the case.
 
Posted 4 hours ago
5 hours ago, bullsfan27 said:
Florida played that bowl game like they didn't even want to be there.
If you look at their history of "big" wins against P5 teams, that's pretty much been the modus operandi ... but they've definitely parlayed that into where they are.
 
Dead Man Walkin'....

"I believe we've made a lot of progress," Scott said recently. "We've added a lot of depth and that's something I've been concerned about. One good thing about the transfer portal, you can flip your roster much more quickly than you used to.

"When you add high school players, they have to be developed before they can really help you. With the transfer portal, you can add players that can contribute right away and the relationships you have with college coaches, they're much more likely to give you an honest assessment of a player's ability, what kind of fit they'll be."

"But there's no question, it's time for us to have success on the field. We've laid the foundation with our staff and players. It's year three. We need to win."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT