You Bill fans like womanizing shitheads who'll say anything you wanna hear - Trump's your guy!
Donald Drumpf sucks thread but come in and watch Sir Gal and Coke kneel before the dumbass
- Thread starter KnighttimeJoe
- Start date
LOL so true when like Trump's foreign policy lack of experience got our ambassador sodomized & ISIS came to power!
Soooooooooo as much as I hate Dump, I'm voting for him. I've criticized Marino and Coke in the past for wasting their vote on a third party candidate and I'm not a hypocrite. Voting for anyone but Trump would guarantee another four years of Obummer and a huge shift in the Supreme Court. We have no idea what the orange raccoon will do but we know what Hillary will do. Time to get on board everyone.
Atta boy first 85 now BTK, only a matter of time before KTJ comes over to the orange side.
There's a better chance coke learns how to write a coherent setence before I vote for the orange raccoon.
Give yourself to the Dark Side. It is the only way you can save your friends. Yes, your thoughts betray you.
I'm sorry, but I just can't do it. I can't vote for someone who is lambasting the judiciary with racist remarks. Furthermore I can't vote for a guy our enemies and rivals want to see elected into power. I cannot willingly vote for someone Russia and Putin, China, and North Korea want to see elected. And don't kid yourselves, Russia and China want to see him in office so they can run roughshod over him in every single one of their international decisions.
He doesn't know what he is getting himself into. He's a thin skinned baby who will be worked by our enemies.
I can't stand Hillary, but I will die before my vote goes to Trump.
He doesn't know what he is getting himself into. He's a thin skinned baby who will be worked by our enemies.
I can't stand Hillary, but I will die before my vote goes to Trump.
I don't like the guy ( as a presidential candidate ) but I don't see how you think Russia, PRC, and NK want him elected.
Can you expound on this?
Dark side. That is racist.
NK says he would be a wise choice. Putin would prefer to work with Trump over Clinton according to some reports. Of course, they could just want a total disaster in the White House.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don't like Trump but I'll never vote for a socialist. Voting for a 3rd party guarantees Killary gets into power and the current regime continues. I think we still haven't hit the bombshell that her "charity" is a scam.
"Our enemies" per who? The media. The media which is controlled by who?... Keep popping those blue pills and watch your sports & Hollywood movies.
A clever man would tell us he prefers the other candidate, because he would know that only a great fool would believe him. We are not great fools, so clearly we can not choose the opposite candidate they tell us. But he would have known that was the case, he would have counted on it, so we can clearly not choose the candidate they say they prefer....
I thought maybe not having to campaign against anyone for a while may afford Trump the chance to remove his head from his ass and act a little more polished, but incredibly he's even gone further down the path of idiocy and lunacy.
I'm not joking when I say that I think Donald Trump is mentally unstable. Like, there's a disorder not diagnosed in there that is causing a form of dementia.
My only option at this point is to vote for Gary Johnson, despite his own moronic viewpoints, since I it's a moral hazard to vote for either Trump or Clinton.
I'm not joking when I say that I think Donald Trump is mentally unstable. Like, there's a disorder not diagnosed in there that is causing a form of dementia.
My only option at this point is to vote for Gary Johnson, despite his own moronic viewpoints, since I it's a moral hazard to vote for either Trump or Clinton.
why even vote then? He has no shot at getting elected. I'm no Trump fan, but at least the supreme court isn't going to get screwed up if he gets in the office. Maybe it can be good that other countries think our president is unstable. We have been pissed on by the rest of the world for the last 8 years.
Right now he has 10% of the popular vote (with few people knowing he's even an option). What it the tipping point for him having a shot?
Allegedly, 15%. If he can get at least that, he can get on the debates. That would allow him to get more exposure.
If ¡Yeb! was the nominee I'd be going hard in the paint for the Libertarian Party FWIW. Think Gary's running mate is pretty shit tier, but whatever.
Let me be clear- Johnson can't and won't win, and I don't give a shit. He's polling around 10% now, and given the 2 dumpster fires running as R and D, there's no reason he can't reach 15%. That would be UNHEARD OF for a 3rd party candidate in modern times.
It would also likely result in whoever wins not breaking 50%, meaning neither dipshit running would have a mandate for anything. It would neuter them to a large degree.
Imagine if the race ended something like 40/40/20? It would shake up American politics for good. And ironically, Johnson would be the one doing it, not Trump.
If there are debates without him, I wonder if it would still increase his popularity. I'm trying to think of a scenario where someone who is currently planning on voting for him, watches a Hillary/Trump debate and changes their vote to one of them. Maybe they think one is even worse than they thought?
He's obviously got a glass ceiling unless he can change the "wasted vote" mentality.
This "debate" rule is so idiotic. They say you must have 15% to get on the stage, but they need a stage to get to 15%! There are so many mindless zombies who only tune into politics for the debate cage-matches.
There's no better example of this than Trump who basically advanced his entire campaign via debates, with no real organization or ad campaign to speak of.
If no one gets over 50% of the electoral college votes, it goes to a vote in the house of Representatives. The GOP controls the house, but it could get interesting. Wrangling all those Republicans to vote for Trump.
If you think Trump is going to go along with a Republican agenda, you are fooling yourself. Trump's agenda is Trump. Hell, he might appoint Mark Cuban to the Supreme Court.
.
I smell "Shark Tank: Supreme Court Edition"
This is exactly why Republicans want an independent to run, purely in case the above scenario happens and the House could elect someone not named Trump.
My prediction is that Trump himself declines the Republication Nomination, or just leaves the race saying he is "Too Busy." It is the only way out to save face and not "lose." You heard it here first...
I've been waiting for this for a long time but now I really doubt it. He'd be smart to do that since he's only focused on enlarging his "brand" but I guess he's really going to stick around to take his ass kicking and embarrassment. Hey, I guess at least he'll have his insane advisors (all 3 of them) to ease him down.
Trump is supposedly preparing for a full national outreach campaign to beat Clinton, yet instead here he is personally attacking an obscure judge in a case that no one would have even paid attention to if not for Trump himself. And in the process he alienated even more people than before.
The guy is an absolute manic dipshit.
I think even Sir G is understanding now since he's been absent trying to defend this lunatic.
The guy is an absolute manic dipshit.
I think even Sir G is understanding now since he's been absent trying to defend this lunatic.
I love how 85 is now suddenly campaigning for Johnson to be put into the debates so that he can get a larger share of the votes. Too bad we can search the old message boards. Id bring up the old debates about why I wanted a 3rd party to be present in those debates while 85 was say no way should they be allowed since they didnt have enough of a percentage to get put on the debate in the first place. Something about the 3rd party only taking away votes from the main 2 choices...
LOL- seriously? Here's the context you chose to avoid:
In 2012, Johnson managed a whopping .99% of the national vote. BARELY edging out some random Green Party person. At no time leading up to the election was he EVER running above 1.5%. He was statistically closer to the "Socialism and Liberation Party" than he was either one of the major parties. In other words, it was an absolute irrelevant campaign in 2012.
In 2008, Libertarian Bob Barr was on 47 state ballots yet managed a total of 500,000 votes. Again- utterly irrelevant.
Today, however, Johnson is legitimately polling at 10-12% with 6 months left to go until the election. This is nothing like 2008 and 2012 and is reflective of the nature of this year's election. It's much more credible to lobby for someone running at 12% to be on the debate stage vs. someone running at .99%.
Your argument is invalid.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
Friday 7pm. Purdue Fort Wayne at UCF. ESPN+, radio, or in the arena.
- Latest: Central Floridave
-
-
