Nm

[Crazyhole]

Chemoprophylaxis against COVID-19 among health-care workers using Ivermectin in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is a novel viral infectious disease that the World Health Organization (WHO) has announced to be a pandemic. This meta-analysis was aimed at providing evidence for the use of ivermectin to prevent COVID-19 among hospital workers in low-resource countries...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

I guess horsepaste actually is effective. Can't see why the NIH would publish this if it isn't true.

 

[Ucfmikes]

 

[Ucfmikes]

 

[Ucfmikes]

 

[Crazyhole]

View embedded media

How many covid cases were there in the week leading up to December 4th?

 

[Crazyhole]

If this accurate in a 2 week time period no unvaccinated person died under 50. Tell me again why we are forcing vaccinations or promoting them on kids or a healthy 30 year old? We already know it does nothing to slow the spread.

View embedded media

Mike's link is bullshit data. There would have to have been 1 million boosted people that tested positive for the math to work.

 

[Ucfmikes]

How many covid cases were there in the week leading up to December 4th?

 

[Ucfmikes]

Mike's link is bullshit data. There would have to have been 1 million boosted people that tested positive for the math to work.

 

[Ucfmikes]

The number of covid cases were higher than the peak of covid without a vaccine. 🤣

 

[Ucfmikes]

 

[Ucfmikes]

 

[Ucfmikes]

Age breakdown of deaths with unvaccinated. I hope that helps. ✌

Technical degree
Means that the degree you got from a school is not accredited except at the school itself. There is a standard degree in which at the least takes 4 years and there is a technical degree which can take as little as 4 weeks. Usually the schools that offer technical degrees are for-profit private schools which tend to butcher the course. Such as taking out the standard liberal art requirements, Taking out the requirements for advanced classes, etc.

For the most part they are not accepted by other schools except the school you got it from. They tend to not be valued by employers. Due to the fact that if a diploma says Masters(type of degree) on it it technically doesn't mean anything.

 

[Ucfmikes]

Age breakdown of deaths with unvaccinated. I hope that helps. ✌

 

[Ucfmikes]

Age breakdown of deaths with unvaccinated. I hope that helps. ✌

 

[Ucfmikes]

Nice rebuttal...lol

I should fit right in
I didn’t even read the Tweet. 😂😂😂

 

[Ucfmikes]

Nice rebuttal...lol

 

[Crazyhole]

Chemoprophylaxis against COVID-19 among health-care workers using Ivermectin in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is a novel viral infectious disease that the World Health Organization (WHO) has announced to be a pandemic. This meta-analysis was aimed at providing evidence for the use of ivermectin to prevent COVID-19 among hospital workers in low-resource countries...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

I guess horsepaste actually is effective. Can't see why the NIH would publish this if it isn't true.

Bump for @Boston.Knight

 

[UCFBS]

Chemoprophylaxis against COVID-19 among health-care workers using Ivermectin in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is a novel viral infectious disease that the World Health Organization (WHO) has announced to be a pandemic. This meta-analysis was aimed at providing evidence for the use of ivermectin to prevent COVID-19 among hospital workers in low-resource countries...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

I guess horsepaste actually is effective. Can't see why the NIH would publish this if it isn't true.

Cue the 'meta-analysis' counter-argument from @litehedded

I'm staying out of this one.

 

[litehedded]

summoned to the water cooler again? ew.

 

[UCFBS]

View embedded media

So, I was saying no mandates for those under 40.
I now change that to under 60.

Thanks @KNIGHTTIME^ !!!

 

[UCFBS]

summoned to the water cooler again? ew.

No, you have at this one. I'm not debating Ivermectin at this point.

 

[Ucfmikes]

No, you have at this one. I'm not debating Ivermectin at this point.

 

[Ucfmikes]

Bump for @Boston.Knight

 

[Crazyhole]

4.No repetitive negative posting. What makes a repetitive post? If you come to the forum and consistently say the exact same thing about the exact same topic day in and day out, that is being repetitive. Be sure to understand that no one is saying that you can not be critical. But this site will not be overrun by the same people coming on the site day after day saying the same negative things.
No flaming: If a poster come onto the board with the intent only to flame, and continues to post nothing but flames or engages in no substantive discussion, the poster's posts will be deleted and the poster will be banned at the mod’s discretion.

 

[litehedded]

No, you have at this one. I'm not debating Ivermectin at this point.

it took a little digging because the full text wasn't even linked here for some reason (or maybe we all know the reason). It was published in the Indian journal of pharmacology, a very prestigious journal no doubt.

But of course, this meta-analysis and systematic review includes fraudulent data:

come on guys all you gotta do is actually read the things before you link to them...
in the largest RCT included in this meta analysis (the largest ever done so far in the world), NO BENEFIT WAS FOUND

 

[Crazyhole]

it took a little digging because the full text wasn't even linked here for some reason (or maybe we all know the reason). It was published in the Indian journal of pharmacology, a very prestigious journal no doubt.

But of course, this meta-analysis and systematic review includes fraudulent data:

come on guys all you gotta do is actually read the things before you link to them...
in the largest RCT included in this meta analysis (the largest ever done so far in the world), NO BENEFIT WAS FOUND

So, don't link to pubmed?

 

[litehedded]

So, don't link to pubmed?

you can link to pubmed, but as you can see if you attempt to read the meta-analysis, it's not there. you can only read the abstract. surely you noticed this when you tried to read the paper?

 

[Crazyhole]

you can link to pubmed, but as you can see if you attempt to read the meta-analysis, it's not there. you can only read the abstract. surely you noticed this when you tried to read the paper?

So why would NIH publish it?

 

[litehedded]

So why would NIH publish it?

they didn't...
they linked to it at the bottom of the page. being on pubmed does not equal peer review...
the highly esteemed indian journal of pharmacology handled the peer review on this baby. in any case, it was submitted in february of 2021, presumably before everyone became aware of the fraud contained therein. this journal published it much later though. sus.

 

[Boston.Knight]

Seriously bad news for vaccine enhanced disease. mRNA is turning into a real shit show

 

[Ucfmikes]

4.No repetitive negative posting. What makes a repetitive post? If you come to the forum and consistently say the exact same thing about the exact same topic day in and day out, that is being repetitive. Be sure to understand that no one is saying that you can not be critical. But this site will not be overrun by the same people coming on the site day after day saying the same negative things.
No flaming: If a poster come onto the board with the intent only to flame, and continues to post nothing but flames or engages in no substantive discussion, the poster's posts will be deleted and the poster will be banned at the mod’s discretion.

Stop killing people with false, anti-vaxx propaganda snowflake ❄️

 

[Ucfmikes]

Seriously bad news for vaccine enhanced disease. mRNA is turning into a real shit show

View embedded media

More than 535 million doses of COVID-19 vaccine had been given in the United States from December 14, 2020, through January 24, 2022. To view the current total number of COVID-19 vaccinations that have been administered in the United States, please visit the CDC COVID Data Tracker.
COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. COVID-19 vaccines were evaluated in tens of thousands of participants in clinical trials. The vaccines met the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) rigorous scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality needed to support emergency use authorization (EUA). Learn more about EUAs in this video.external icon
The Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson/Janssen COVID-19 vaccines will continue to undergo the most intensive safety monitoring in US history. This monitoring includes using both established and new safety monitoring systems to make sure that COVID-19 vaccines are safe.

Common Side Effects​

After COVID-19 vaccination, some people may feel ill, with symptoms like fever or tiredness for a day or two after receiving the vaccine. These symptoms are normal and are signs that the body is building immunity. Some people have no side effects. Others have reported common side effects after COVID-19 vaccination,such as:

• Swelling, redness, and pain at the injection site
• Fever
• Headache
• Tiredness
• Muscle pain
• Chills
• Nausea

Serious Safety Problems Are Rare​

In rare cases, people have experienced serious health events after COVID-19 vaccination. Any health problem that happens after vaccination is considered an adverse event. An adverse event can be caused by the vaccine or can be caused by a coincidental event not related to the vaccine.

 

[Ucfmikes]

View embedded media

 

[UCFBS]

Seriously bad news for vaccine enhanced disease. mRNA is turning into a real shit show

View embedded media

So ... I looked at the raw study (full table on page 50).

https://publichealthscotland.scot/MEDIA/11223/22-01-19-COVID19-WINTER_PUBLICATION_REPORT.PDF

The overall deaths are so low and ... at times ... wacko. I mean ... getting only 1 dose was better than 2, and could be as good as 3. But then, as you showed, the unvaccinated and 1 dose was better than 2 doses! Then you had 3 doses, which looked the best.

But, again, the overall deaths are so low ... I mean, mortality per 100,000 when there are only a few million people, only 300K in the 1 shot category. It's really difficult to draw any absolute conclusion.

That's why no shots or 1 shot could be better than 2 shots. And then we had 3 shots which had the most individuals, but the deaths were then similiar, so lower rate, because there were more people.

In any case, not many people are dying ... vaccinated or not ... in Scotland.

 

[UCFBS]

it took a little digging because the full text wasn't even linked here for some reason (or maybe we all know the reason). It was published in the Indian journal of pharmacology, a very prestigious journal no doubt.

But of course, this meta-analysis and systematic review includes fraudulent data:

come on guys all you gotta do is actually read the things before you link to them...
in the largest RCT included in this meta analysis (the largest ever done so far in the world), NO BENEFIT WAS FOUND

That's why I tagged you. As I said, I wasn't entering the debate.

 

[UCFBS]

View embedded media

I'm as Libertarian as they come, but the hypocrisy of Progressives with stuff like this always cracks me up!

"Social distance and mask at work, school, mask!
No more than 10 people at church!
Unless, of course, you're at a protest with thousands of strangers you've never met."

"No school extracurricular activities!
No church services!
But we'll keep distributing condoms to athletic groups and fraternities so they have protection when sleeping with strangers."

Our governments at work ... and their 'mandates!'

No wonder even Liberals agree with Conservatives that Progressives have gone off the deep end and utterly lack common sense.

Hey ... let's try this out ... why don't we just let people decided for themselves?! Because, obviously, the government really doesn't know WTF it's doing!

 

[Vote for Rusty in 2022]

Joe Biden couldn't sell pussy on a troop train.

 

[Crazyhole]

they didn't...
they linked to it at the bottom of the page. being on pubmed does not equal peer review...
the highly esteemed indian journal of pharmacology handled the peer review on this baby. in any case, it was submitted in february of 2021, presumably before everyone became aware of the fraud contained therein. this journal published it much later though. sus.

I guess I just don't get it. You say that the publisher is highly esteemed and its consistent with dozens and dozens of US doctors that are saying the same thing, but its still bunk. Why, and for what reason? We aren't talking about healing crystals and magnets here, it's an actual proven pharmaceutical.

 

[litehedded]

I guess I just don't get it. You say that the publisher is highly esteemed and its consistent with dozens and dozens of US doctors that are saying the same thing, but its still bunk. Why, and for what reason? We aren't talking about healing crystals and magnets here, it's an actual proven pharmaceutical.

Because it contains falsified data. I provided a link earlier with an explanation that was published in the journal Nature.

I was being facetious when I called them a good journal

 

[Crazyhole]

Because it contains falsified data. I provided a link earlier with an explanation that was published in the journal Nature.

I was being facetious when I called them a good journal

If it contains falsified data, why wasn't it taken down?