Fake news headline. They rejected the timeline of turning nukes over; not denuclearization outright.
FC fails again
Fake news headline. They rejected the timeline of turning nukes over; not denuclearization outright.
FC fails again
They're still producing fissile material. The timeline we offered to give up 60-70% of their stockpile is not unreasonable. They still haven't declared the number of weapons in their stockpile. The rhetoric they are pushing out is calling Pompeo et al gangsters and not respecting them.
I think this whole thing was a stunt for Fat Boy to shore up support within his country. He comes out playing nice for a change and gets some good photos with world leaders, signs a non-binding joint statement with POTUS, and comes home looking like the great negotiator. Now when it comes to nut cutting time with negotiations they screw around and twist it like the US doesn't respect them and play the same song they always do about us. The difference now is they have all this media coverage of KJU meeting and "negotiating" that they can play at home to their people and say America and the ROK are bullies and gangsters not serious about peace.
Wait. So the US policy is to kill millions of people first? What?None of that really matters for NK. They can dick around and play media games all they want; the reality they face is that if they do not actually denuclearize, then the odds are that they will be at the receiving end of a ?US-led first strike within 3 years. There is no way that after giving theme every opportunity to seize diplomacy and denuclearize, in exchange for sanctions relief and acting like a normal country, the US or S Korea are going to just stand by if they attempt to do their own thing and ramp up the nuclear program.
Is there a point where you would be in support of an attack on NK that may result on mass NK casualties?Wait. So the US policy is to kill millions of people first? What?
Maybe I read too much into 85's "first-strike" statement, assuming he meant a nuclear strike. In that vein, I don't think there's any way I would support the US striking first with nuclear force. A different military action could be justified, though.Is there a point where you would be in support of an attack on NK that may result on mass NK casualties?
None of that really matters for NK. They can dick around and play media games all they want; the reality they face is that if they do not actually denuclearize, then the odds are that they will be at the receiving end of a ?US-led first strike within 3 years. There is no way that after giving theme every opportunity to seize diplomacy and denuclearize, in exchange for sanctions relief and acting like a normal country, the US or S Korea are going to just stand by if they attempt to do their own thing and ramp up the nuclear program.
Maybe I read too much into 85's "first-strike" statement, assuming he meant a nuclear strike. In that vein, I don't think there's any way I would support the US striking first with nuclear force. A different military action could be justified, though.
Maybe I read too much into 85's "first-strike" statement, assuming he meant a nuclear strike. In that vein, I don't think there's any way I would support the US striking first with nuclear force. A different military action could be justified, though.
Any sort of military action outside of maybe a cyber attack is going to lead to millions of deaths.
So would KJU with nukes and ICBMs
That’s not necessarily true if the groundwork has been laid in the NK to have a significant contingent to support the assault. Which is the other side of the coin on the Kim summit photo ops. Sure, their state run media will see Kim doing things and spin the upper hand, but they’ll also see images of places they’ve never seen before and the regime likes to pretend are lies. Sometimes it’s the subtle things that matter in the long game.Any sort of military action outside of maybe a cyber attack is going to lead to millions of deaths.
So would KJU with nukes and ICBMs
He already has them.
That’s not necessarily true if the groundwork has been laid in the NK to have a significant contingent to support the assault. Which is the other side of the coin on the Kim summit photo ops. Sure, their state run media will see Kim doing things and spin the upper hand, but they’ll also see images of places they’ve never seen before and the regime likes to pretend are lies. Sometimes it’s the subtle things that matter in the long game.
He doesn’t have qualified ICBMs. Putting a few into the ocean doesn’t verify capability. He also doesn’t have warheads compacted that can fit into a missile delivery system to threaten the mainland .
He doesn’t have this. He could in 3 years based upon experts on the subject. Hence my comment.
I happen to be an expert on nuclear weapons, and they have demonstrated enough capability that you should be concerned.
Get ready, 85 is about to make fun of you. No one knows more about any subject than he does. After all he gets his news straight from the same source as the president: Fox News.
I don't get disrespectful with people. I like discussions, even with people I disagree with. We're all UCF fans just bullshitting waiting for football season.
I happen to be an expert on nuclear weapons, and they have demonstrated enough capability that you should be concerned.
Their artillery is enough of a threat to the RoKs that worrying about SCUDs is secondary. It’s why we moved most of our stuff down to Camp Humphries. Which sucks because there aren’t any good hotels down there and it’s a long ass drive from Seoul.But it is a certainty. We start massing for an assault they're going to fire SCUDs and IRBMs with chemical weapons at the South and Japan. People tend to overestimate our abilities in the region and underestimate the type of damage and pain NK can inflict, even with a poorly equipped military.
Why are we talking about war? I thought this problem was solved.
Thank you for pointing out why it's a terrible idea to try to get your point across in 140 characters or fewer.Lmao at chicken for posting a third of what he said
Thank you for pointing why it's a terrible idea to try to get your point across in 140 characters or fewer.
It's going off the rails because of his dumb shit tariffs. Got it.Lmao at chicken for posting a third of what he said
You're right, the lack of Chevy Suburbans and Dodge Durangos being bought in Europe is really destroying the Economy.It's going off the rails because of his dumb shit tariffs. Got it.
Lmao at chicken for posting a third of what he said